Disciplinarity and Exploitation: Compositionists as Good Professionals

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
James H. Sledd
{"title":"Disciplinarity and Exploitation: Compositionists as Good Professionals","authors":"James H. Sledd","doi":"10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I7.184511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why was the emergence of \"composition studies,\" the achievement of \"disciplinarity\" by a fortunate minority of compositionists, neatly paralleled by the deepening exploitation of composition's most numerous teachers, the teaching assistants, part-timers, and other contingent workers? Why did a few directors \"get grants, rank, and tenure\" while growing numbers of classroom teachers remained overworked, underpaid, and insecure? Why did the conventional ambition of good professionals end in bossdom?","PeriodicalId":42624,"journal":{"name":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I7.184511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Why was the emergence of "composition studies," the achievement of "disciplinarity" by a fortunate minority of compositionists, neatly paralleled by the deepening exploitation of composition's most numerous teachers, the teaching assistants, part-timers, and other contingent workers? Why did a few directors "get grants, rank, and tenure" while growing numbers of classroom teachers remained overworked, underpaid, and insecure? Why did the conventional ambition of good professionals end in bossdom?
纪律与开发:作曲家是优秀的专业人士
为什么“作曲研究”的出现,是少数幸运的作曲家在“纪律”方面取得的成就,与对作曲领域数量最多的教师、助教、兼职人员和其他临时工作者的不断深入的剥削是完全平行的?为什么少数董事“获得了拨款、晋升和终身职位”,而越来越多的任课教师仍然超负荷工作、薪酬过低、缺乏安全感?为什么优秀专业人士的传统抱负最终会成为老板?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor
Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信