ON INCOMPARABILITY OF INTERPRETATION ALGORITHMS OF TYPED FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMS WITH RESPECT TO UNDEFINED VALUE

D. Grigoryan
{"title":"ON INCOMPARABILITY OF INTERPRETATION ALGORITHMS OF TYPED FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMS WITH RESPECT TO UNDEFINED VALUE","authors":"D. Grigoryan","doi":"10.46991/pysu:a/2018.52.2.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper the interpretation algorithms of typed functional programs are considered. The interpretation algorithm is based on substitution, $ \\beta $-reduction and canonical $ \\delta $-reduction. It is shown that seven known interpretation algorithms (FS (of full substitution), PES (of parallel external substitution), LES (of left external substitution), PIS (of parallel inner substitution), LIS (of left inner substitution), ACT (active algorithm), PAS (passive algorithm)) are pairwise incomparable with respect to undefined value ($ \\perp $-incomparable).","PeriodicalId":21146,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the YSU A: Physical and Mathematical Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the YSU A: Physical and Mathematical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46991/pysu:a/2018.52.2.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the paper the interpretation algorithms of typed functional programs are considered. The interpretation algorithm is based on substitution, $ \beta $-reduction and canonical $ \delta $-reduction. It is shown that seven known interpretation algorithms (FS (of full substitution), PES (of parallel external substitution), LES (of left external substitution), PIS (of parallel inner substitution), LIS (of left inner substitution), ACT (active algorithm), PAS (passive algorithm)) are pairwise incomparable with respect to undefined value ($ \perp $-incomparable).
关于未定义值的类型化函数程序解释算法的不可比性
本文研究了类型化函数程序的解释算法。解释算法基于替换、$ \beta $ -约简和规范$ \delta $ -约简。结果表明,对于未定义值($ \perp $ -incomparable),已知的7种解释算法(FS (full substitution)、PES (parallel external substitution)、LES (left external substitution)、PIS (parallel inner substitution)、LIS (left inner substitution)、ACT (active algorithm)、PAS (passive algorithm))是两两不可比较的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信