Analyzing quality of life and influencing factors in patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after radiotherapy by bone pain scale

Q4 Medicine
Chong Geng, Su-ping Sun, T. Ye, Hua Hui, Min Wang, Shaodong Tong
{"title":"Analyzing quality of life and influencing factors in patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after radiotherapy by bone pain scale","authors":"Chong Geng, Su-ping Sun, T. Ye, Hua Hui, Min Wang, Shaodong Tong","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo study the effect of radiotherapy on the quality of life (QOL) of patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by analyzing the Function Assessment of Cancer Treatment(FACT), and to analyze the influence of clinical factors on the improvement of the QOL after radiotherapy. \n \n \nMethods \nThe FACT bone pain scale in 43 patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after radiotherapy was retrospectively analyzed. The changes in QOL score before and after radiotherapy were analyzed by T test from five aspects: overall QOL score, general functional status, pain degree, physical function and social psychology. Further analysis was made on the scores of patients whose QOL had not been improved. Chi-square test was used to analyze the correlation between clinical factors and QOL improvement after radiotherapy. \n \n \nResults \nAfter radiotherapy, the QOL of patients were improved in all aspects compared with those before radiotherapy, and there were statistical differences (t=7.621, 5.887, 9.407, 7.785, 4.487, P<0.05). In patients whose QOL did not improve after radiotherapy, the scores of overall QOL and psychosocial assessment decreased significantly, and there were significant differences (t=3.381, 4.982, P<0.05). Among the clinical factors, soft tissue mass at bone metastasis site and radiotherapy prescription dose had significant effects on the improvement of patients′ life after radiotherapy (χ2=5.180, 7.457, P<0.05). Whether there were soft tissue masses in bone metastases before radiotherapy, the improvement rates of QOL after radiotherapy were 50.00% and 85% respectively. The improvement rates of QOL after radiotherapy were 44.44% and 84% in patients with prescription dose of <40 Gy and≥40 Gy respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that soft tissue mass at bone metastasis site, the dose of radiotherapy prescription and numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain had more significant effects on QOL (OR=0.296, 0.020, 1.592, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nRadiotherapy at bone metastasis sites can significantly improve the QOL of liver cancer patients with bone metastasis. Psychosocial status can affect the QOL of patients. In the case of soft tissue mass in bone metastasis site, the prescription dose of radiotherapy (≥40 Gy) can better improve the QOL. \n \n \nKey words: \nBone Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Radiotherapy; Bone Pain Scale; Quality of Life","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"10 1","pages":"216-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2020.03.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To study the effect of radiotherapy on the quality of life (QOL) of patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by analyzing the Function Assessment of Cancer Treatment(FACT), and to analyze the influence of clinical factors on the improvement of the QOL after radiotherapy. Methods The FACT bone pain scale in 43 patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after radiotherapy was retrospectively analyzed. The changes in QOL score before and after radiotherapy were analyzed by T test from five aspects: overall QOL score, general functional status, pain degree, physical function and social psychology. Further analysis was made on the scores of patients whose QOL had not been improved. Chi-square test was used to analyze the correlation between clinical factors and QOL improvement after radiotherapy. Results After radiotherapy, the QOL of patients were improved in all aspects compared with those before radiotherapy, and there were statistical differences (t=7.621, 5.887, 9.407, 7.785, 4.487, P<0.05). In patients whose QOL did not improve after radiotherapy, the scores of overall QOL and psychosocial assessment decreased significantly, and there were significant differences (t=3.381, 4.982, P<0.05). Among the clinical factors, soft tissue mass at bone metastasis site and radiotherapy prescription dose had significant effects on the improvement of patients′ life after radiotherapy (χ2=5.180, 7.457, P<0.05). Whether there were soft tissue masses in bone metastases before radiotherapy, the improvement rates of QOL after radiotherapy were 50.00% and 85% respectively. The improvement rates of QOL after radiotherapy were 44.44% and 84% in patients with prescription dose of <40 Gy and≥40 Gy respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that soft tissue mass at bone metastasis site, the dose of radiotherapy prescription and numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain had more significant effects on QOL (OR=0.296, 0.020, 1.592, P<0.05). Conclusions Radiotherapy at bone metastasis sites can significantly improve the QOL of liver cancer patients with bone metastasis. Psychosocial status can affect the QOL of patients. In the case of soft tissue mass in bone metastasis site, the prescription dose of radiotherapy (≥40 Gy) can better improve the QOL. Key words: Bone Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Radiotherapy; Bone Pain Scale; Quality of Life
用骨痛量表分析肝癌骨转移患者放疗前后生活质量及影响因素
目的通过分析肿瘤治疗功能评估(FACT),探讨放疗对肝细胞癌骨转移患者生活质量(QOL)的影响,分析临床因素对放疗后生活质量改善的影响。方法回顾性分析43例肝癌骨转移患者放疗前后的FACT骨痛评分。从总体生活质量评分、一般功能状态、疼痛程度、身体功能、社会心理五个方面分析放疗前后生活质量评分的变化。对生活质量未得到改善的患者进行评分分析。采用卡方检验分析临床因素与放疗后生活质量改善的相关性。结果放疗后患者各方面生活质量较放疗前均有改善,差异有统计学意义(t=7.621、5.887、9.407、7.785、4.487,P<0.05)。放疗后生活质量未改善的患者,总体生活质量评分和心理社会评估评分均显著下降,差异有统计学意义(t=3.381, 4.982, P<0.05)。临床因素中,骨转移部位软组织体积和放疗处方剂量对患者放疗后生活的改善有显著影响(χ2=5.180, 7.457, P<0.05)。放疗前骨转移是否存在软组织肿块,放疗后生活质量改善率分别为50.00%和85%。处方剂量<40 Gy和≥40 Gy患者放疗后生活质量改善率分别为44.44%和84%。多因素分析显示,骨转移部位软组织肿块、放疗处方剂量和疼痛数值评定量表(NRS)对患者生活质量的影响更为显著(OR=0.296、0.020、1.592,P<0.05)。结论骨转移部位放疗可显著改善肝癌骨转移患者的生活质量。心理社会状况会影响患者的生活质量。在骨转移部位软组织肿块的情况下,处方放疗剂量(≥40 Gy)能更好地改善生活质量。关键词:肝细胞癌骨转移;放射治疗;骨痛量表;生活品质
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信