260 Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Outcomes of Day Case Mastectomy Versus Inpatient Model, Using a Validated Questionnaire

S. Ramasamy, M. Fazel, G. Patel
{"title":"260 Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Outcomes of Day Case Mastectomy Versus Inpatient Model, Using a Validated Questionnaire","authors":"S. Ramasamy, M. Fazel, G. Patel","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac039.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Many women undergoing simple mastectomy have an overnight hospital stay. Offering a day case procedure for simple mastectomy has the potential to improve outcomes in terms of patient safety, feasibility, and reduction in associated costs. We aimed to study the proportion of day case mastectomies over a 2-year period and assessed relative readmission and complication rates alongside patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Following this, we wanted to analyse whether a day case procedure should be routinely offered. Method A retrospective audit was conducted on all patients undergoing a simple mastectomy. Data were collected from patient and pathology records. PROMs were obtained via telephone conversation using the validated BREAST-Q survey. Patient demographics, reason for mastectomy and readmission for complications were all assessed. Results Out of the 202 patients analysed, over 75% had an overnight stay. The most common complications for both groups of patients were readmission due to infection and haematoma evacuation, with similar rates across the two (p = 0.26, p = 0.69). Data from PROMs also suggested that patients had similar outcome and satisfaction levels (p = 0.27). Conclusions The result from this study shows that it is safe as well as acceptable to patients to offer simple mastectomies as a day case procedure. This has become more important since COVID-19 reduced inpatient theatre capacity, and it is anticipated that these outcomes will allow a routine day case mastectomy pathway to be established even when normal operations recommence as encouraged by the association of day case surgery.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"635 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of oral surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac039.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Many women undergoing simple mastectomy have an overnight hospital stay. Offering a day case procedure for simple mastectomy has the potential to improve outcomes in terms of patient safety, feasibility, and reduction in associated costs. We aimed to study the proportion of day case mastectomies over a 2-year period and assessed relative readmission and complication rates alongside patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Following this, we wanted to analyse whether a day case procedure should be routinely offered. Method A retrospective audit was conducted on all patients undergoing a simple mastectomy. Data were collected from patient and pathology records. PROMs were obtained via telephone conversation using the validated BREAST-Q survey. Patient demographics, reason for mastectomy and readmission for complications were all assessed. Results Out of the 202 patients analysed, over 75% had an overnight stay. The most common complications for both groups of patients were readmission due to infection and haematoma evacuation, with similar rates across the two (p = 0.26, p = 0.69). Data from PROMs also suggested that patients had similar outcome and satisfaction levels (p = 0.27). Conclusions The result from this study shows that it is safe as well as acceptable to patients to offer simple mastectomies as a day case procedure. This has become more important since COVID-19 reduced inpatient theatre capacity, and it is anticipated that these outcomes will allow a routine day case mastectomy pathway to be established even when normal operations recommence as encouraged by the association of day case surgery.
260日间乳房切除术与住院模式患者满意度和结果的比较,使用有效问卷
许多接受单纯性乳房切除术的妇女住院过夜。提供简单乳房切除术的单日病例程序有可能在患者安全性,可行性和降低相关成本方面改善结果。我们的目的是研究2年内乳房切除术的比例,并评估相对再入院率和并发症发生率以及患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。在此之后,我们想分析是否应该常规提供每日病例程序。方法对所有单纯性乳房切除术患者进行回顾性分析。数据收集自患者和病理记录。prom通过电话交谈获得,使用经过验证的BREAST-Q调查。患者人口统计学,乳房切除术的原因和并发症的再入院都进行了评估。结果在分析的202例患者中,超过75%的患者过夜。两组患者最常见的并发症是因感染和血肿清除而再次入院,两组患者的发生率相似(p = 0.26, p = 0.69)。来自PROMs的数据也表明患者有相似的结果和满意度水平(p = 0.27)。结论本研究的结果表明,简单的乳房切除术是安全的,也是患者可以接受的。由于COVID-19减少了住院医院的容量,这一点变得更加重要,预计这些结果将允许建立常规的日间病例乳房切除术途径,即使在日间病例手术相关的鼓励下恢复正常手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信