Can robots recognize common Marine gestures?

Mary Ruttum, S. P. Parikh
{"title":"Can robots recognize common Marine gestures?","authors":"Mary Ruttum, S. P. Parikh","doi":"10.1109/SSST.2010.5442835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a different method for humanrobot interaction and further encourages communication between human users and their robotic counterparts. The focus of our work is to develop a human-robot communication system that is not easily detectable and increases stealth when necessary. The human-robot interaction system we propose involves hand signals. Hand gestures are a common modality of communication humans use with each other. Likewise, hand commands are used by the Marine Corps to convey information to each other without speaking. We analyze common Marine gestures so that similar commands can be used to direct a robot out in the field. In this paper, we have selected important hand or body gestures used by the Marine Corps. We then identify distinguishable features for the different gestures. This includes position of joint variables as well as velocity and acceleration terms. Once ideal models of the gestures are designed, experimental data is gathered. Presently, we are comparing two different machine learning methods that can be used to identify a specific gesture. The two methods we are comparing are Bayesian networks and neural networks. This paper provides the background and structure of our experiments. Then, both models are discussed and experimental results are included. Finally, we make a comparison of the effectiveness of the two methods of interest.","PeriodicalId":6463,"journal":{"name":"2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)","volume":"39 1","pages":"227-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSST.2010.5442835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper provides a different method for humanrobot interaction and further encourages communication between human users and their robotic counterparts. The focus of our work is to develop a human-robot communication system that is not easily detectable and increases stealth when necessary. The human-robot interaction system we propose involves hand signals. Hand gestures are a common modality of communication humans use with each other. Likewise, hand commands are used by the Marine Corps to convey information to each other without speaking. We analyze common Marine gestures so that similar commands can be used to direct a robot out in the field. In this paper, we have selected important hand or body gestures used by the Marine Corps. We then identify distinguishable features for the different gestures. This includes position of joint variables as well as velocity and acceleration terms. Once ideal models of the gestures are designed, experimental data is gathered. Presently, we are comparing two different machine learning methods that can be used to identify a specific gesture. The two methods we are comparing are Bayesian networks and neural networks. This paper provides the background and structure of our experiments. Then, both models are discussed and experimental results are included. Finally, we make a comparison of the effectiveness of the two methods of interest.
机器人能识别常见的海军陆战队手势吗?
本文为人机交互提供了一种不同的方法,并进一步鼓励了人类用户与机器人之间的交流。我们的工作重点是开发一种不易被发现的人机通信系统,并在必要时增加隐身性。我们提出的人机交互系统涉及手势信号。手势是人类相互之间常用的一种交流方式。同样,海军陆战队也使用手命令来相互传递信息,而不用说话。我们分析了常见的海军陆战队手势,以便使用类似的命令来指导机器人在野外工作。在本文中,我们选择了海军陆战队使用的重要手势或身体手势。然后我们为不同的手势识别可区分的特征。这包括关节变量的位置以及速度和加速度项。一旦设计出理想的手势模型,就可以收集实验数据。目前,我们正在比较可用于识别特定手势的两种不同的机器学习方法。我们比较的两种方法是贝叶斯网络和神经网络。本文提供了实验的背景和结构。然后对两种模型进行了讨论,并给出了实验结果。最后,我们对两种感兴趣的方法的有效性进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信