A One Health approach to investigate bats as a potential source of zoonotic mycoses in selected areas of Mpumalanga province, the Republic of South Africa

Tilaye Shibbiru Mengistu, I. Van Wyk, M. Oosthuizen, Lientjie Cohen, Jeanette Wentzel
{"title":"A One Health approach to investigate bats as a potential source of zoonotic mycoses in selected areas of Mpumalanga province, the Republic of South Africa","authors":"Tilaye Shibbiru Mengistu, I. Van Wyk, M. Oosthuizen, Lientjie Cohen, Jeanette Wentzel","doi":"10.4314/evj.v26i2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A One Health approach pilot study was carried out in selected villages within the Mnisi Traditional Authority’s area, Manyeleti Game Reserve, and Hans Hoheisen Wildlife Research Station in Mpumalanga Province, the Republic of South Africa from July to December 2018. The study’s main objectives were to identify positive and negative human-bat-environment interactions and microbiological screening of bats’ faecal samples for zoonotic fungi. Thirty-three purposively selected participants were asked to complete a structured questionnaire with multiple-choice and open-ended questions, and a total of 55 faecal samples were collected, 25 from identified bat roosting sites and 30 from captured bats. Ninety seven percent of respondents were aware of the presence or absence of bats in their immediate surroundings. However, the majority of them (87.9%) were uneasy about the presence of bats in their buildings, and nearly half (48.5%) were unsure whether bats play a positive or negative role in the environment. Some respondents (15.2%) stated that bats play beneficial roles in the environment, such as pollinating plants, spreading seeds of indigenous plants, catching harmful insects, and so on. More than half of the respondents (66.7%) stated that bats can be a nuisance; 18.2% of those polled reported contracting fungal diseases as a result of cleaning bat droppings without adequate protection. The analysis of faecal samples revealed that bats can harbour pathogenic fungi such as Aspergillus fumigatus, and A.flavus. We concluded that bats can harbour fungal pathogens that cause human diseases. Further research should be conducted to compile a complete list of fungi pathogens in bats in the study area.","PeriodicalId":12019,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Veterinary Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/evj.v26i2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A One Health approach pilot study was carried out in selected villages within the Mnisi Traditional Authority’s area, Manyeleti Game Reserve, and Hans Hoheisen Wildlife Research Station in Mpumalanga Province, the Republic of South Africa from July to December 2018. The study’s main objectives were to identify positive and negative human-bat-environment interactions and microbiological screening of bats’ faecal samples for zoonotic fungi. Thirty-three purposively selected participants were asked to complete a structured questionnaire with multiple-choice and open-ended questions, and a total of 55 faecal samples were collected, 25 from identified bat roosting sites and 30 from captured bats. Ninety seven percent of respondents were aware of the presence or absence of bats in their immediate surroundings. However, the majority of them (87.9%) were uneasy about the presence of bats in their buildings, and nearly half (48.5%) were unsure whether bats play a positive or negative role in the environment. Some respondents (15.2%) stated that bats play beneficial roles in the environment, such as pollinating plants, spreading seeds of indigenous plants, catching harmful insects, and so on. More than half of the respondents (66.7%) stated that bats can be a nuisance; 18.2% of those polled reported contracting fungal diseases as a result of cleaning bat droppings without adequate protection. The analysis of faecal samples revealed that bats can harbour pathogenic fungi such as Aspergillus fumigatus, and A.flavus. We concluded that bats can harbour fungal pathogens that cause human diseases. Further research should be conducted to compile a complete list of fungi pathogens in bats in the study area.
在南非共和国姆普马兰加省选定地区调查蝙蝠作为人畜共患真菌病潜在来源的One Health方法
2018年7月至12月,在南非共和国姆普马兰加省Mnisi传统管理局地区、Manyeleti野生动物保护区和Hans Hoheisen野生动物研究站的选定村庄进行了一项“一种健康”方法试点研究。该研究的主要目标是确定人-蝙蝠-环境相互作用的阳性和阴性,并对蝙蝠粪便样本进行人畜共患真菌的微生物筛选。有目的选择的33名参与者被要求完成一份包含多项选择和开放式问题的结构化问卷,共收集了55份粪便样本,其中25份来自已确定的蝙蝠栖息地点,30份来自捕获的蝙蝠。97%的受访者意识到他们周围有或没有蝙蝠。然而,他们中的大多数人(87.9%)对蝙蝠在他们的建筑物中的存在感到不安,近一半(48.5%)不确定蝙蝠在环境中是发挥积极还是消极的作用。一些受访者(15.2%)认为蝙蝠在环境中发挥了有益的作用,如为植物授粉、传播本地植物种子、捕捉有害昆虫等。超过一半的受访者(66.7%)表示蝙蝠可能令人讨厌;18.2%的受访者报告说,由于在没有适当保护的情况下清洁蝙蝠粪便而感染真菌疾病。对粪便样本的分析表明,蝙蝠可以携带致病真菌,如烟曲霉和黄曲霉。我们的结论是,蝙蝠可以携带导致人类疾病的真菌病原体。应进行进一步的研究,以编制研究地区蝙蝠真菌病原体的完整清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信