Informal resolution of complaints against the police

R. Young, C. Hoyle, K. Cooper, R. Hill
{"title":"Informal resolution of complaints against the police","authors":"R. Young, C. Hoyle, K. Cooper, R. Hill","doi":"10.1177/1466802505055837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many jurisdictions it is increasingly recognized that police complaints systems should contain a mixture of formal and less formal procedures, as well as allow for a variety of outcomes including remedial and punitive ones. Recent changes to the system for handling complaints against the police in England and Wales envisage an expanded role for local (informal) resolution, with a new range of options including restorative justice conferences. Yet little is known about whether complainants would welcome the option of a restorative justice conference or whether restorative processes would constitute an improvement on conventional practices. This article presents the results of a Nuffield Foundation funded study of these issues carried out in 2002-3 in two police force areas. The findings suggest that restorative processes can achieve moderately better results than conventional processes. While widespread implementation of this new approach is likely to prove problematic for many police services, a flexible approach to introducing changes, drawing on the experience of restorative practitioners in related areas, is likely to benefit complainants without creating dissatisfaction among police officers.","PeriodicalId":10793,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice","volume":"101 1","pages":"279 - 317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802505055837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

In many jurisdictions it is increasingly recognized that police complaints systems should contain a mixture of formal and less formal procedures, as well as allow for a variety of outcomes including remedial and punitive ones. Recent changes to the system for handling complaints against the police in England and Wales envisage an expanded role for local (informal) resolution, with a new range of options including restorative justice conferences. Yet little is known about whether complainants would welcome the option of a restorative justice conference or whether restorative processes would constitute an improvement on conventional practices. This article presents the results of a Nuffield Foundation funded study of these issues carried out in 2002-3 in two police force areas. The findings suggest that restorative processes can achieve moderately better results than conventional processes. While widespread implementation of this new approach is likely to prove problematic for many police services, a flexible approach to introducing changes, drawing on the experience of restorative practitioners in related areas, is likely to benefit complainants without creating dissatisfaction among police officers.
对警察投诉的非正式解决
在许多司法管辖区,人们日益认识到,警察申诉制度应包括正式和不太正式的程序,并允许各种结果,包括补救和惩罚结果。英格兰和威尔士最近对处理警察投诉的制度进行了改革,设想扩大地方(非正式)解决方案的作用,其中包括恢复性司法会议等一系列新的选择。然而,很少有人知道申诉人是否会欢迎召开恢复性司法会议的选择,或者恢复性程序是否会构成对传统做法的改进。本文介绍了纳菲尔德基金会资助的一项研究的结果,该研究于2002- 2003年在两个警察部队地区进行。研究结果表明,恢复性过程可以达到比传统过程更好的结果。虽然这种新办法的广泛实施可能会给许多警察部门带来问题,但采用灵活的方法进行改革,借鉴相关领域的恢复性从业人员的经验,可能会使投诉人受益,而不会引起警察的不满。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信