TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP HAK ASUH ANAK AKIBAT PERCERAIAN DIKARENAKAN PESELINGKUHAN (Studi Kasus Putusan No.601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn)

Putri Nabilah, S. Suparman, Andi Maysarah
{"title":"TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP HAK ASUH ANAK AKIBAT PERCERAIAN DIKARENAKAN PESELINGKUHAN (Studi Kasus Putusan No.601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn)","authors":"Putri Nabilah, S. Suparman, Andi Maysarah","doi":"10.46576/lj.v3i1.2300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn the event of a divorce both father and mother can be given the same right to care for and educate their children after divorce especially the divorce referred to in Decision No. 601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn. So that the problem arises, namely how is the legal review related with post-divorce child custody, what are the underlying factors behind the custody of the child falls to the father in the verdict No.601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn, how are the judges' considerations in doing this decision No.601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn in deciding child custody rights to the father as a result of divorce.The type of research used in writing this thesis is juridical normative descriptive analysis. Data collection techniques that used is a literature study (Library Research).Legal reviews related to post-divorce child custody are available on the Marriage Law, namely Article 41, Article 45, Article 47, Article 48 and Article 49. Furthermore, it is also found in the Compilation of Islamic Law, through Article 105. What are the factors behind child custody falling to the father in Decision No.601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn, firstly, the Defendant/Wife committed an affair and was known to have booked a hotel 2 (two) times with his mistress. Second, the Defendant has admitted his actions before the Plaintiff, his family and traditional leaders had an affair. Third, the affair committed by the Defendant shows that: betrayal and irresponsible behavior of the Defendant as the wife and at the same time the mother in marriage, which makes the Plaintiff and Defendant finally agreed to divorce and was judged by the judge to be unworthy custody of their children, caused by the actions of the Defendant who It is feared that it will have a negative impact on their children.Keywords : Juridical Review, Child Custody, Divorce","PeriodicalId":33353,"journal":{"name":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v3i1.2300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn the event of a divorce both father and mother can be given the same right to care for and educate their children after divorce especially the divorce referred to in Decision No. 601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn. So that the problem arises, namely how is the legal review related with post-divorce child custody, what are the underlying factors behind the custody of the child falls to the father in the verdict No.601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn, how are the judges' considerations in doing this decision No.601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn in deciding child custody rights to the father as a result of divorce.The type of research used in writing this thesis is juridical normative descriptive analysis. Data collection techniques that used is a literature study (Library Research).Legal reviews related to post-divorce child custody are available on the Marriage Law, namely Article 41, Article 45, Article 47, Article 48 and Article 49. Furthermore, it is also found in the Compilation of Islamic Law, through Article 105. What are the factors behind child custody falling to the father in Decision No.601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn, firstly, the Defendant/Wife committed an affair and was known to have booked a hotel 2 (two) times with his mistress. Second, the Defendant has admitted his actions before the Plaintiff, his family and traditional leaders had an affair. Third, the affair committed by the Defendant shows that: betrayal and irresponsible behavior of the Defendant as the wife and at the same time the mother in marriage, which makes the Plaintiff and Defendant finally agreed to divorce and was judged by the judge to be unworthy custody of their children, caused by the actions of the Defendant who It is feared that it will have a negative impact on their children.Keywords : Juridical Review, Child Custody, Divorce
因受虐待而离婚的儿童监护权审查(案件编号601/Pdt /2020/PN)
[摘要]在离婚情况下,特别是在第601/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn号决定规定的离婚情况下,父母双方在离婚后享有照顾和教育子女的同等权利。那么问题来了,在601/Pdt.G/2020/PN号判决书中,法律审查与离婚后子女抚养权是如何关联的,孩子的抚养权落在父亲身上背后的潜在因素是什么?法官在做出第601/Pdt.G/2020/PN号判决时,考虑了哪些因素?在决定离婚后孩子的抚养权给父亲时。撰写本论文所使用的研究类型是法律规范描述性分析。资料收集所用的技术是文献研究(Library Research)。离婚后子女抚养的相关法律审查可参考《婚姻法》第四十一条、第四十五条、第四十七条、第四十八条和第四十九条。此外,在《伊斯兰教法汇编》第105条中也发现了这一点。第601/Pdt.G/2020/PN号决定中子女抚养权归父亲的原因是什么?第一,被告/妻子有外遇,并与其情妇订了两(两次)间酒店。第二,被告在原告面前承认了他的行为,他的家人和传统领袖有婚外情。第三,被告的外遇行为表明:被告在婚姻中作为妻子和母亲的背叛和不负责任的行为,使得原告和被告最终同意离婚,并被法官判定不值得监护他们的孩子,这是由于被告的行为造成的,被告担心这会对他们的孩子产生负面影响。关键词:司法审查,子女监护权,离婚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信