Implikasi Pemahaman Kehidupan yang Baik pada Perkembangan Konsep Diri dalam Filsafat

MELINTAS Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.26593/mel.v36i2.5379
Maria Kirana Rucitra
{"title":"Implikasi Pemahaman Kehidupan yang Baik pada Perkembangan Konsep Diri dalam Filsafat","authors":"Maria Kirana Rucitra","doi":"10.26593/mel.v36i2.5379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout their lives, human beings have been shadowed with existential queries such as “What is my purpose?” and “How should I reach that purpose?” These big questions arise in accordance with an assumption that a good life must be a purposeful life. However, the same questions often lead to dilemmatic disposition of following my own goal or following other ideals designed by institutions or even theories. This article elaborates humans’ tendencies to perceive themselves as a fixated part of and to lean their purpose of life on the so-called grand narratives. One of the narratives shows that humans’ purpose in life is rooted in the understanding of humans’ essence. Humans’ essence is here viewed in two aspects, that is, the ‘centered’ self and the ‘decentered’ self. However, these two aspects are not without consequences. The centered self understood in the light of Aristotle and Kant holds a bigger possibility of ignoring historical and cultural values which basically play the pivotal parts of a human being’s constitution. On the other hand, the decentered self understood in the light of Richard Rorty tends to heavily impact the clarity of the path the self along with its purposes. This article attempts to unfold the problems around human being’s ‘center’ and their implications to the concept of self.","PeriodicalId":18472,"journal":{"name":"MELINTAS","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MELINTAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v36i2.5379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout their lives, human beings have been shadowed with existential queries such as “What is my purpose?” and “How should I reach that purpose?” These big questions arise in accordance with an assumption that a good life must be a purposeful life. However, the same questions often lead to dilemmatic disposition of following my own goal or following other ideals designed by institutions or even theories. This article elaborates humans’ tendencies to perceive themselves as a fixated part of and to lean their purpose of life on the so-called grand narratives. One of the narratives shows that humans’ purpose in life is rooted in the understanding of humans’ essence. Humans’ essence is here viewed in two aspects, that is, the ‘centered’ self and the ‘decentered’ self. However, these two aspects are not without consequences. The centered self understood in the light of Aristotle and Kant holds a bigger possibility of ignoring historical and cultural values which basically play the pivotal parts of a human being’s constitution. On the other hand, the decentered self understood in the light of Richard Rorty tends to heavily impact the clarity of the path the self along with its purposes. This article attempts to unfold the problems around human being’s ‘center’ and their implications to the concept of self.
理解生活的好处在于哲学中自我概念的发展
在他们的一生中,人类一直被存在主义问题所笼罩,比如“我的目的是什么?”以及“我该如何达到那个目的?”这些大问题的出现与一个假设相一致,即美好的生活必须是有目的的生活。然而,同样的问题往往会导致我选择追随自己的目标,还是追随制度甚至理论所设计的其他理想。这篇文章阐述了人类倾向于将自己视为固定的一部分,并将他们的生活目的依赖于所谓的宏大叙事。其中一种叙述表明,人类生活的目的植根于对人类本质的理解。人的本质从两个方面来看待,即“中心的”自我和“非中心的”自我。然而,这两个方面并非没有后果。亚里士多德和康德所理解的中心自我更有可能忽视历史和文化价值,而历史和文化价值基本上是人类构成的关键部分。另一方面,根据理查德·罗蒂的理解,去中心化的自我倾向于严重影响自我路径及其目的的清晰度。本文试图揭示围绕人的“中心”问题及其对自我概念的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信