A Comparison of Explanation Methods of Encapsulation Efficacy of Hydroquinone in a Liposomal System

K. Rabea, Fazly Bazzaz Bibi Sedigheh, Housaindokht Mohammad Reza, E. Azadeh, R. Omid
{"title":"A Comparison of Explanation Methods of Encapsulation Efficacy of Hydroquinone in a Liposomal System","authors":"K. Rabea, Fazly Bazzaz Bibi Sedigheh, Housaindokht Mohammad Reza, E. Azadeh, R. Omid","doi":"10.22037/JPS.V7I2.11699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important parameters describing the liposomal formulation of hydroquinone is encapsulation efficacy. For the efficacy evaluation of hydroquinone trapped in liposomal structure, there is a need to first separate liposome from the matrix surrounding it. There are various separation techniques; however, in this study, the three techniques of centrifuges with and without washing and dialysis were used. From among the laboratory techniques, an appropriate method is the one that offers responses with a high repeatability. The statistical calculations revealed that encapsulation efficacy with a direct method resulted from a separation via the techniques of dialysis and centrifuge without washing had the highest dispersion with SDs of 6.1 and 8.7, respectively, while the SD value in the technique of centrifuge with washing was 5.2. Through an indirect method, hydroquinone encapsulation efficacy showed the best repeatability with SD values of 2.8 and 2.1 by using the two techniques of centrifuge and centrifuge filtration, respectively. It seems that the treatments leading to the dilution of hydroquinone formulation would result in hydroquinone leakage and a reduction of encapsulation efficacy. It seems that measurement of hydroquinone encapsulation efficacy with an indirect method is a better choice; therefore,  a centrifuge technique was utilized to report the mentioned efficacy at a speed of 45000 rcf and duration of 30 min due to having a reasonable price and ease of access.","PeriodicalId":16663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paramedical sciences","volume":"626 1","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paramedical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/JPS.V7I2.11699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

One of the most important parameters describing the liposomal formulation of hydroquinone is encapsulation efficacy. For the efficacy evaluation of hydroquinone trapped in liposomal structure, there is a need to first separate liposome from the matrix surrounding it. There are various separation techniques; however, in this study, the three techniques of centrifuges with and without washing and dialysis were used. From among the laboratory techniques, an appropriate method is the one that offers responses with a high repeatability. The statistical calculations revealed that encapsulation efficacy with a direct method resulted from a separation via the techniques of dialysis and centrifuge without washing had the highest dispersion with SDs of 6.1 and 8.7, respectively, while the SD value in the technique of centrifuge with washing was 5.2. Through an indirect method, hydroquinone encapsulation efficacy showed the best repeatability with SD values of 2.8 and 2.1 by using the two techniques of centrifuge and centrifuge filtration, respectively. It seems that the treatments leading to the dilution of hydroquinone formulation would result in hydroquinone leakage and a reduction of encapsulation efficacy. It seems that measurement of hydroquinone encapsulation efficacy with an indirect method is a better choice; therefore,  a centrifuge technique was utilized to report the mentioned efficacy at a speed of 45000 rcf and duration of 30 min due to having a reasonable price and ease of access.
对苯二酚在脂质体系统中包封效果解释方法的比较
表征对苯二酚脂质体配方的最重要参数之一是包封效果。为了评价捕获在脂质体结构中的对苯二酚的功效,需要首先将脂质体与其周围的基质分离。有各种各样的分离技术;但本研究采用了有洗、无洗、透析三种离心机技术。在实验室技术中,一个合适的方法是提供高重复性的反应。统计计算结果表明,直接分离法和离心不洗分离法的包封效果弥散度最高,分别为6.1和8.7,离心不洗分离法的SD值为5.2。通过间接法,采用离心和离心过滤两种技术,对苯二酚包封效果重复性最佳,SD值分别为2.8和2.1。导致对苯二酚制剂稀释的处理可能导致对苯二酚泄漏,降低包封效果。采用间接法测定对苯二酚的包封效果是较好的选择;因此,由于价格合理且易于获得,因此采用离心机技术以45000 RCF的速度和30分钟的持续时间报告上述功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信