Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: initial experience and comparison with conventional thyroid surgery

Rafael De Cicco, R. Souza, F. Guerra
{"title":"Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: initial experience and comparison with conventional thyroid surgery","authors":"Rafael De Cicco, R. Souza, F. Guerra","doi":"10.4322/ahns.2020.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial support: None. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest declared concerning the publication of this article. Submitted: November 26, 2019. Accepted: February 18, 2020. The study was carried out at Departamento de Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Instituto de Câncer Dr. Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho (IAVC), São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Abstract Introduction: Recent interest of physicians and patients to prevent scars in the neck in thyroid surgery has fostered the development of several remote access techniques in recent decades. Among the various techniques developed, transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) has shown to be a safe alternative, in selected cases, to conventional thyroidectomy. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the results of TOETVA in patients with thyroid nodules and compare them with those in patients undergoing conventional thyroidectomy. Methods: Retrospective cohort study comparing 31 patients submitted to endoscopic versus 30 conventional thyroidectomies, regarding operative time, complications and pain scale. Results: Thirty-one cases of TOETVA were compared with 30 conventional thyroidectomies conducted in the same period in a tertiary care center. Similar complication rates were observed in both groups, with shorter operative time for endoscopic surgery compared with that of traditional access. Conclusion: TOETVA can be safely performed in selected cases, with similar complication rates, and shorter operative time compared with conventional thyroidectomy.","PeriodicalId":8285,"journal":{"name":"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/ahns.2020.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Financial support: None. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest declared concerning the publication of this article. Submitted: November 26, 2019. Accepted: February 18, 2020. The study was carried out at Departamento de Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Instituto de Câncer Dr. Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho (IAVC), São Paulo, SP, Brasil. Abstract Introduction: Recent interest of physicians and patients to prevent scars in the neck in thyroid surgery has fostered the development of several remote access techniques in recent decades. Among the various techniques developed, transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) has shown to be a safe alternative, in selected cases, to conventional thyroidectomy. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the results of TOETVA in patients with thyroid nodules and compare them with those in patients undergoing conventional thyroidectomy. Methods: Retrospective cohort study comparing 31 patients submitted to endoscopic versus 30 conventional thyroidectomies, regarding operative time, complications and pain scale. Results: Thirty-one cases of TOETVA were compared with 30 conventional thyroidectomies conducted in the same period in a tertiary care center. Similar complication rates were observed in both groups, with shorter operative time for endoscopic surgery compared with that of traditional access. Conclusion: TOETVA can be safely performed in selected cases, with similar complication rates, and shorter operative time compared with conventional thyroidectomy.
经口内窥镜甲状腺前庭入路切除术:初步经验及与常规甲状腺手术的比较
资金支持:无。利益冲突:本文发表未声明存在利益冲突。提交日期:2019年11月26日。录用日期:2020年2月18日。这项研究是在巴西圣保罗州圣保罗市阿尔纳尔多·维埃拉·德·卡瓦略博士研究中心(IAVC)、卡瓦略和阿尔瓦略研究所的卡瓦略和阿尔瓦略研究所进行的。摘要简介:最近几十年来,医生和患者对甲状腺手术中防止颈部疤痕的兴趣促进了几种远程访问技术的发展。在发展的各种技术中,经口内窥镜甲状腺切除术前庭入路(TOETVA)已被证明是一种安全的选择,在某些情况下,传统的甲状腺切除术。目的:本研究旨在评估TOETVA在甲状腺结节患者中的效果,并将其与常规甲状腺切除术患者的效果进行比较。方法:回顾性队列研究,比较31例内镜下和30例常规甲状腺切除术患者的手术时间、并发症和疼痛程度。结果:31例TOETVA与同期在三级保健中心进行的30例常规甲状腺切除术进行了比较。两组并发症发生率相似,内镜手术时间较传统手术时间短。结论:与常规甲状腺切除术相比,TOETVA手术可安全进行,并发症发生率相近,手术时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信