Model Checking Probabilistic Real-Time Properties for Service-Oriented Systems with Service Level Agreements

Infinity Pub Date : 2011-11-13 DOI:10.4204/EPTCS.73.8
Christian Krause, H. Giese
{"title":"Model Checking Probabilistic Real-Time Properties for Service-Oriented Systems with Service Level Agreements","authors":"Christian Krause, H. Giese","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.73.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assurance of quality of service properties is an important aspect of service-oriented software engineering. Notations for so-called service level agreements (SLAs), such as the Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) language, provide a formal syntax to specify such assurances in terms of (legally binding) contracts between a service provider and a customer. On the other hand, formal methods for verification of probabilistic real-time behavior have reached a level of expressiveness and efficiency which allows to apply them in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we suggest to employ the recently introduced model of Interval Probabilistic Timed Automata (IPTA) for formal verification of QoS properties of service-oriented systems. Specifically, we show that IPTA in contrast to Probabilistic Timed Automata (PTA) are able to capture the guarantees specified in SLAs directly. A particular challenge in the analysis of IPTA is the fact that their naive semantics usually yields an infinite set of states and infinitely-branching transitions. However, using symbolic representations, IPTA can be analyzed rather efficiently. We have developed the first implementation of an IPTA model checker by extending the PRISM tool and show that model checking IPTA is only slightly more expensive than model checking comparable PTA.","PeriodicalId":31175,"journal":{"name":"Infinity","volume":"19 1","pages":"64-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infinity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.73.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The assurance of quality of service properties is an important aspect of service-oriented software engineering. Notations for so-called service level agreements (SLAs), such as the Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) language, provide a formal syntax to specify such assurances in terms of (legally binding) contracts between a service provider and a customer. On the other hand, formal methods for verification of probabilistic real-time behavior have reached a level of expressiveness and efficiency which allows to apply them in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we suggest to employ the recently introduced model of Interval Probabilistic Timed Automata (IPTA) for formal verification of QoS properties of service-oriented systems. Specifically, we show that IPTA in contrast to Probabilistic Timed Automata (PTA) are able to capture the guarantees specified in SLAs directly. A particular challenge in the analysis of IPTA is the fact that their naive semantics usually yields an infinite set of states and infinitely-branching transitions. However, using symbolic representations, IPTA can be analyzed rather efficiently. We have developed the first implementation of an IPTA model checker by extending the PRISM tool and show that model checking IPTA is only slightly more expensive than model checking comparable PTA.
具有服务水平协议的面向服务系统的概率实时属性的模型检查
服务属性的质量保证是面向服务的软件工程的一个重要方面。所谓的服务水平协议(sla)的符号,例如Web服务水平协议(WSLA)语言,提供了一种正式的语法,以服务提供者和客户之间(具有法律约束力的)合同的形式指定这种保证。另一方面,用于验证概率实时行为的形式化方法已经达到了可表达性和效率的水平,可以在现实场景中应用它们。在本文中,我们建议使用最近引入的区间概率时间自动机(IPTA)模型来形式化验证面向服务系统的QoS属性。具体来说,我们证明了与概率时间自动机(PTA)相比,IPTA能够直接捕获sla中指定的保证。IPTA分析中的一个特殊挑战是,它们的朴素语义通常会产生无限组状态和无限分支转换。然而,使用符号表示,可以相当有效地分析IPTA。我们通过扩展PRISM工具开发了IPTA模型检查器的第一个实现,并显示模型检查IPTA只比模型检查类似PTA稍微贵一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信