Towards evidence-based treatment of female perpetrated intimate partner violence and abuse

E. Bowen, J. Mackay
{"title":"Towards evidence-based treatment of female perpetrated intimate partner violence and abuse","authors":"E. Bowen, J. Mackay","doi":"10.4324/9781315169842-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses what is known about the nature and prevalence of intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) perpetrated by women and then explore the evidence of the associated risk and need factors. The implications for potential treatments are then presented. IPVA may be perpetrated by women in either heterosexual or same-sex relationships. Women engage in a range of violent behaviour not dissimilar to men, although there is some dispute about the comparable seriousness of the injuries caused, with evidence that women are more likely to be more seriously injured. The Risk-Need-Responsivity model is an influential model in the development of offending behaviour interventions. Based on the three principles of risk, need, and responsivity, the model states that matching the right offender with the right intervention is likely to produce the most effective means of reducing reoffending. The empirical evidence shows that IPVA is perpetrated and experienced by women at rates similar to, or higher than, those reported by men. © 2019 selection and editorial matter, Elizabeth A. Bates and Julie C. Taylor; individual chapters, the contributors.","PeriodicalId":93750,"journal":{"name":"Family & intimate partner violence quarterly","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family & intimate partner violence quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169842-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This chapter discusses what is known about the nature and prevalence of intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) perpetrated by women and then explore the evidence of the associated risk and need factors. The implications for potential treatments are then presented. IPVA may be perpetrated by women in either heterosexual or same-sex relationships. Women engage in a range of violent behaviour not dissimilar to men, although there is some dispute about the comparable seriousness of the injuries caused, with evidence that women are more likely to be more seriously injured. The Risk-Need-Responsivity model is an influential model in the development of offending behaviour interventions. Based on the three principles of risk, need, and responsivity, the model states that matching the right offender with the right intervention is likely to produce the most effective means of reducing reoffending. The empirical evidence shows that IPVA is perpetrated and experienced by women at rates similar to, or higher than, those reported by men. © 2019 selection and editorial matter, Elizabeth A. Bates and Julie C. Taylor; individual chapters, the contributors.
对女性实施的亲密伴侣暴力和虐待进行循证治疗
本章讨论关于妇女实施的亲密伴侣暴力和虐待(IPVA)的性质和普遍程度的已知情况,然后探讨相关风险和需求因素的证据。然后提出了潜在治疗方法的含义。女性在异性恋或同性关系中都可能实施性侵。妇女从事的一系列暴力行为与男子没有什么不同,尽管对所造成伤害的可比性存在一些争议,有证据表明妇女更有可能受到更严重的伤害。风险-需求-反应模型在犯罪行为干预的发展中是一个有影响力的模型。基于风险、需求和反应三个原则,该模型表明,将正确的罪犯与正确的干预相匹配,可能会产生减少再犯的最有效手段。经验证据表明,妇女犯下和经历IPVA的比率与男子报告的相似或更高。©2019选择和编辑事项,Elizabeth A. Bates和Julie C. Taylor;个别章节,贡献者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信