Alison A Smith, A. Ciaraglia, Benjamin Axtman, CJ Winckler, D. Wampler, Maxwell A. Braverman, C. P. Shahan, Rachelle Babbitt Jonas, Michael Shiels, B. Eastridge, Ronald M Stewart, Susannah E. Nicholson, Donald J. Jenkins
{"title":"Matched Cohort Study of Open Thoracostomies Performed by Ground Medics","authors":"Alison A Smith, A. Ciaraglia, Benjamin Axtman, CJ Winckler, D. Wampler, Maxwell A. Braverman, C. P. Shahan, Rachelle Babbitt Jonas, Michael Shiels, B. Eastridge, Ronald M Stewart, Susannah E. Nicholson, Donald J. Jenkins","doi":"10.56068/qmbv3502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tension pneumothorax resulting from chest trauma is a rapidly fatal condition that requires prompt treatment. Prehospital open thoracostomy (POT) is a potentially lifesaving intervention that can be performed in the field to treat tension pneumothorax. However, the results from POT performed by ground EMS providers have not been well-studied. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients with chest trauma who underwent POT performed by ground EMS providers with a matched cohort who did not undergo this procedure in the field. \nMethods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive adult patients presenting to a Level I trauma center with chest trauma were analyzed from 2017-2020. Outcomes were compared to a patient cohort who did not undergo POT matched by severity of injury and prehospital CPR. \nResults: A total of 14 POT patients were identified. Majority of POT were bilateral (n=11/14, 78.6%) and all of these patients (n=14/14) had prehospital cardiac arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was obtained in 2 patients with penetrating injuries (14.3%). There was no difference in total and scene EMS time compared to the matched cohort without POT (p>0.05). \nConclusions: This study demonstrated that open thoracostomies could be performed by ground EMS units without increasing prehospital time for severely injured trauma patients and greater achievement of ROSC. Larger, prospective, multi-institutional analyses are needed to further evaluate outcomes.","PeriodicalId":73465,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paramedicine","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56068/qmbv3502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tension pneumothorax resulting from chest trauma is a rapidly fatal condition that requires prompt treatment. Prehospital open thoracostomy (POT) is a potentially lifesaving intervention that can be performed in the field to treat tension pneumothorax. However, the results from POT performed by ground EMS providers have not been well-studied. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients with chest trauma who underwent POT performed by ground EMS providers with a matched cohort who did not undergo this procedure in the field.
Methods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive adult patients presenting to a Level I trauma center with chest trauma were analyzed from 2017-2020. Outcomes were compared to a patient cohort who did not undergo POT matched by severity of injury and prehospital CPR.
Results: A total of 14 POT patients were identified. Majority of POT were bilateral (n=11/14, 78.6%) and all of these patients (n=14/14) had prehospital cardiac arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was obtained in 2 patients with penetrating injuries (14.3%). There was no difference in total and scene EMS time compared to the matched cohort without POT (p>0.05).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that open thoracostomies could be performed by ground EMS units without increasing prehospital time for severely injured trauma patients and greater achievement of ROSC. Larger, prospective, multi-institutional analyses are needed to further evaluate outcomes.