Political economics, collective action and wicked socio-ecological problems: A practice story from the field

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
L. Adams, T. Alter, M. Parkes, M. Reid, A. Woolnough
{"title":"Political economics, collective action and wicked socio-ecological problems: A practice story from the field","authors":"L. Adams, T. Alter, M. Parkes, M. Reid, A. Woolnough","doi":"10.5130/IJCRE.V12I1.6496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empowering integrative, sustainable and equitable approaches to wicked socio-ecological problems requires multiple disciplines and ways of knowing. Following calls for greater attention to political economics in this transdisciplinary work, we offer a practitioner perspective on political economy and collective action and their influences on our community engagement practice and public policy. Our perspective is grounded in a pervasive wicked problem in Australia, invasive rabbits, and the emergence of the Victorian Rabbit Action Network. The network grew out of a publically funded research project to support community-led action in rabbit management. Victorian residents and workers affected by rabbits – public and private land managers, scientists, government officers and others – were invited to engage in a participatory planning process to generate sustainable strategies to address the rabbit problem. Each stage in the process, which involved interviews, a workshop and consultations, was designed to nurture the critical enquiry, listening and learning skills of participants, advance understandings of the problem from multiple perspectives, generate collective options to guide decision-making, and encourage community-led collective action. We reflect on our understanding of these processes using the language and lens of political economics and, in particular, the context of democratic professionalism. In so doing, we define terms and refer to information resources that have enabled us to bring a practical working knowledge of political economics to our professional practice. Our intent is to motivate academics, community members, government officials, and scientists alike, to draw on their knowledge and field experiences and to share practice stories through the lens of political economics and collective action. This is an opportunity to engage each other in small ‘p’ politics of how we understand and act on wicked problems, to negotiate and connect across disciplines, practical experiences and human difference, so that people may work more creatively and effectively together to address the challenging issues of our time. \n ","PeriodicalId":53967,"journal":{"name":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/IJCRE.V12I1.6496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Empowering integrative, sustainable and equitable approaches to wicked socio-ecological problems requires multiple disciplines and ways of knowing. Following calls for greater attention to political economics in this transdisciplinary work, we offer a practitioner perspective on political economy and collective action and their influences on our community engagement practice and public policy. Our perspective is grounded in a pervasive wicked problem in Australia, invasive rabbits, and the emergence of the Victorian Rabbit Action Network. The network grew out of a publically funded research project to support community-led action in rabbit management. Victorian residents and workers affected by rabbits – public and private land managers, scientists, government officers and others – were invited to engage in a participatory planning process to generate sustainable strategies to address the rabbit problem. Each stage in the process, which involved interviews, a workshop and consultations, was designed to nurture the critical enquiry, listening and learning skills of participants, advance understandings of the problem from multiple perspectives, generate collective options to guide decision-making, and encourage community-led collective action. We reflect on our understanding of these processes using the language and lens of political economics and, in particular, the context of democratic professionalism. In so doing, we define terms and refer to information resources that have enabled us to bring a practical working knowledge of political economics to our professional practice. Our intent is to motivate academics, community members, government officials, and scientists alike, to draw on their knowledge and field experiences and to share practice stories through the lens of political economics and collective action. This is an opportunity to engage each other in small ‘p’ politics of how we understand and act on wicked problems, to negotiate and connect across disciplines, practical experiences and human difference, so that people may work more creatively and effectively together to address the challenging issues of our time.  
政治经济学、集体行动与邪恶的社会生态问题:一个来自田野的实践故事
授权综合、可持续和公平的方法来解决恶劣的社会生态问题需要多种学科和认识方式。在这个跨学科的工作中,我们呼吁更多地关注政治经济学,我们提供了一个实践者的视角来研究政治经济学和集体行动,以及它们对我们的社区参与实践和公共政策的影响。我们的观点是基于澳大利亚普遍存在的邪恶问题,入侵的兔子,以及维多利亚兔子行动网络的出现。该网络源于一个公共资助的研究项目,旨在支持社区主导的兔子管理行动。受兔子影响的维多利亚州居民和工人——公共和私人土地管理者、科学家、政府官员和其他人——被邀请参与一个参与式规划过程,以制定可持续的战略来解决兔子问题。该过程的每个阶段都包括访谈、讲习班和协商,旨在培养参与者的批判性探究、倾听和学习技能,从多个角度增进对问题的理解,产生指导决策的集体选择,并鼓励社区主导的集体行动。我们使用政治经济学的语言和镜头,特别是民主专业主义的背景,反思我们对这些过程的理解。在这样做的过程中,我们定义了术语,并参考了使我们能够将政治经济学的实际工作知识带入我们的专业实践的信息资源。我们的目的是激励学者、社区成员、政府官员和科学家利用他们的知识和实地经验,并通过政治经济学和集体行动的视角分享实践故事。这是一个机会,让我们在如何理解和应对棘手问题的小“p”政治中相互参与,跨学科、实践经验和人类差异进行谈判和联系,这样人们就可以更有创造性、更有效地合作,解决我们这个时代的挑战性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
5
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信