Jam Sessions: Celant and Battisti, Modern and Early Modern Connections

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
I Tatti Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1086/718969
T. Kittler
{"title":"Jam Sessions: Celant and Battisti, Modern and Early Modern Connections","authors":"T. Kittler","doi":"10.1086/718969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE ROLE OF THE CRITIC GERMANO CELANT (1940–2020) in defining and establishing the reputation of the contemporary art movement Arte Povera is well known. In particular, the association of the movement with materials and process largely derives from his contribution to the volume Arte Povera, simultaneously published in English translation as Art Povera in 1969. Less well known is Celant’s use of the work of Eugenio Battisti (1924–1989), a scholar of Renaissance studies, whose major publication was L’antirinascimento (1962). While this connection has been acknowledged in the scholarship, what the young critic took from Battisti, and how he used it in his own work, has yet to be fully explored. Specifically, what was the impact of L’antirinascimento on the young critic and how did Battisti’s version of an anti-Renaissance speak to contemporary art? Conversely, given Battisti’s interest and support of developments in art and culture in Italy in the 1960s, in part through","PeriodicalId":42173,"journal":{"name":"I Tatti Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"193 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I Tatti Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/718969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

THE ROLE OF THE CRITIC GERMANO CELANT (1940–2020) in defining and establishing the reputation of the contemporary art movement Arte Povera is well known. In particular, the association of the movement with materials and process largely derives from his contribution to the volume Arte Povera, simultaneously published in English translation as Art Povera in 1969. Less well known is Celant’s use of the work of Eugenio Battisti (1924–1989), a scholar of Renaissance studies, whose major publication was L’antirinascimento (1962). While this connection has been acknowledged in the scholarship, what the young critic took from Battisti, and how he used it in his own work, has yet to be fully explored. Specifically, what was the impact of L’antirinascimento on the young critic and how did Battisti’s version of an anti-Renaissance speak to contemporary art? Conversely, given Battisti’s interest and support of developments in art and culture in Italy in the 1960s, in part through
Jam Sessions: Celant and Battisti, Modern and Early Modern Connections
评论家切兰特(1940-2020)在定义和建立当代艺术运动“贫穷艺术”的声誉方面所起的作用是众所周知的。特别是,这场运动与材料和工艺的联系很大程度上源于他对《贫穷艺术》(Arte Povera)一书的贡献,该书于1969年同时以英文译本《贫穷艺术》(Art Povera)出版。不太为人所知的是,Celant使用了研究文艺复兴的学者Eugenio Battisti(1924-1989)的作品,后者的主要著作是《反文艺复兴》(L 'antirinascimento, 1962)。虽然这种联系已经在学术界得到了承认,但这位年轻的评论家从巴蒂斯蒂那里得到了什么,以及他如何在自己的作品中使用它,还没有得到充分的探讨。具体来说,《反文艺复兴》对年轻批评家的影响是什么?巴蒂斯蒂的反文艺复兴版本对当代艺术有何影响?相反,鉴于巴蒂斯蒂对20世纪60年代意大利艺术和文化发展的兴趣和支持,在某种程度上通过
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
I Tatti Studies
I Tatti Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信