Dental metal allergy in patients with oral, cutaneous, and genital lichenoid reactions

Leigh Ann Scalf, Joseph F. Fowler Jr, Kelli W. Morgan, Stephen W. Looney
{"title":"Dental metal allergy in patients with oral, cutaneous, and genital lichenoid reactions","authors":"Leigh Ann Scalf,&nbsp;Joseph F. Fowler Jr,&nbsp;Kelli W. Morgan,&nbsp;Stephen W. Looney","doi":"10.1053/ajcd.2001.22777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> The subject of lichen planus (LP) and dental metal allergy long has been debated. An overwhelming majority of the existing literature focuses on mercury and gold salts in relation to oral lichen planus. <strong>Objective:</strong> Our objective was to expand current knowledge regarding LP and lichenoid lesions (LL) and dental metal allergy by investigating more metals and investigating cutaneous and genital disease in addition to oral disease. <strong>Methods:</strong> Fifty-one patients with known LP or LL were patch tested to a series of dental metals. Patients chose to replace their dental metals or make no revision. A telephone survey was conducted after 1 year to determine disease state. <strong>Results:</strong> Thirty-eight of 51 patients (74.5%) had at least 1 positive reaction. Twenty-five of 51 patients (49.0%) showed sensitivity to at least 1 mercurial allergen. Prevalence data for patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) from 1996 to 1998 was available for chromate, cobalt, gold, nickel, and thimerosal. The prevalence of positive reactions was higher in our group than in the NACDG group for all 5 of these allergens, and statistical significance was achieved for chromate (<em>P</em> = .028), gold (<em>P</em> = .041), and thimerosal (<em>P</em> = .005). Of patients who had a positive patch test reaction to 1 or more metals, 100% (9 of 9) reported improvement after metal replacement, whereas 62.5% (15 of 24) reported improvement without metal replacement. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Sensitization to dental metals is more common among LP and LL patients than in routinely tested patients, and might be an etiologic or triggering factor in the disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7653,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 146-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/ajcd.2001.22777","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046199X01093599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

Background: The subject of lichen planus (LP) and dental metal allergy long has been debated. An overwhelming majority of the existing literature focuses on mercury and gold salts in relation to oral lichen planus. Objective: Our objective was to expand current knowledge regarding LP and lichenoid lesions (LL) and dental metal allergy by investigating more metals and investigating cutaneous and genital disease in addition to oral disease. Methods: Fifty-one patients with known LP or LL were patch tested to a series of dental metals. Patients chose to replace their dental metals or make no revision. A telephone survey was conducted after 1 year to determine disease state. Results: Thirty-eight of 51 patients (74.5%) had at least 1 positive reaction. Twenty-five of 51 patients (49.0%) showed sensitivity to at least 1 mercurial allergen. Prevalence data for patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) from 1996 to 1998 was available for chromate, cobalt, gold, nickel, and thimerosal. The prevalence of positive reactions was higher in our group than in the NACDG group for all 5 of these allergens, and statistical significance was achieved for chromate (P = .028), gold (P = .041), and thimerosal (P = .005). Of patients who had a positive patch test reaction to 1 or more metals, 100% (9 of 9) reported improvement after metal replacement, whereas 62.5% (15 of 24) reported improvement without metal replacement. Conclusion: Sensitization to dental metals is more common among LP and LL patients than in routinely tested patients, and might be an etiologic or triggering factor in the disease.

口腔、皮肤和生殖器类地衣反应患者的牙齿金属过敏
背景:扁平苔藓(LP)与牙齿金属过敏的问题一直争论不休。现有文献绝大多数集中在汞和金盐与口腔扁平苔藓的关系。目的:我们的目标是通过调查更多的金属,调查皮肤和生殖器疾病以及口腔疾病,扩大目前关于LP和苔藓样病变(LL)和牙齿金属过敏的知识。方法:对51例已知LP或LL的患者进行一系列牙用金属的贴片试验。患者选择更换牙齿金属或不做修复。1年后进行电话调查以确定病情。结果:51例患者中38例(74.5%)出现至少1次阳性反应。51例患者中有25例(49.0%)对至少1种汞过敏原敏感。北美接触性皮炎小组(NACDG)从1996年到1998年对患者进行了贴片测试,获得了铬酸盐、钴、金、镍和硫柳汞的患病率数据。本组5种过敏原阳性反应发生率均高于NACDG组,其中铬酸盐(P = 0.028)、金(P = 0.041)和硫柳汞(P = 0.005)的阳性反应发生率均具有统计学意义。在对一种或多种金属有阳性斑贴试验反应的患者中,100%(9 / 9)报告金属置换后改善,而62.5%(15 / 24)报告未进行金属置换后改善。结论:牙金属致敏在LP和LL患者中比常规检测患者更为常见,可能是疾病的病因或触发因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信