Saint Clement’s debate on Time and Eternity as a manifest for the Postmodern Spirituality

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Ionuț Vlădescu
{"title":"Saint Clement’s debate on Time and Eternity as a manifest for the Postmodern Spirituality","authors":"Ionuț Vlădescu","doi":"10.51917/dialogo.2021.7.2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This paper wants to be an answer to nowadays’ paradigm of thinking. Contemporary views in the philosophy of time are traditionally categorized into presentism, (live the moment) which regards only the present as real and eternal, and assigns present reality equally to the past, present, and future. As we will notes in the paper the patristic debate of time and eternity provides a very close answer as modern thinking time philosophy to the questions: What is time? What is eternity? Both answered are considering “Today” as crucial bud the patristic view of “Today” as ontological salvation and the modern view consider “Today” hedonistic. \nTime is given to the world only as a fleeting interval to prepare it for perfection and unchanged in eternal life. But this situation of the world in time, or its endowment with change in the review of perfection, implies that it is not of any fundamental essence or any other essence, for, in this case, it could not move towards perfection, but is created from nothing, by a personal Creator forever perfected, who planted her aspiration for him through its perfection of His power, or from the ever-increasing communion with Him.\nThe Christian approach of time philosophy is the answer to the lost soul’s spirituality, scared by the temporal events of life like Covid 19.\"","PeriodicalId":42179,"journal":{"name":"Dialogo","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51917/dialogo.2021.7.2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"This paper wants to be an answer to nowadays’ paradigm of thinking. Contemporary views in the philosophy of time are traditionally categorized into presentism, (live the moment) which regards only the present as real and eternal, and assigns present reality equally to the past, present, and future. As we will notes in the paper the patristic debate of time and eternity provides a very close answer as modern thinking time philosophy to the questions: What is time? What is eternity? Both answered are considering “Today” as crucial bud the patristic view of “Today” as ontological salvation and the modern view consider “Today” hedonistic. Time is given to the world only as a fleeting interval to prepare it for perfection and unchanged in eternal life. But this situation of the world in time, or its endowment with change in the review of perfection, implies that it is not of any fundamental essence or any other essence, for, in this case, it could not move towards perfection, but is created from nothing, by a personal Creator forever perfected, who planted her aspiration for him through its perfection of His power, or from the ever-increasing communion with Him. The Christian approach of time philosophy is the answer to the lost soul’s spirituality, scared by the temporal events of life like Covid 19."
圣克莱门特关于时间与永恒的争论是后现代精神的体现
“这篇论文想要回答当今的思维范式。传统上,当代的时间哲学观点被归为现在论,现在论只认为现在是真实的和永恒的,并把现在的现实性同过去、现在和未来同等对待。正如我们将在论文中注意到的那样,教父关于时间和永恒的辩论为现代思考时间哲学提供了一个非常接近的答案:时间是什么?什么是永恒?两种回答都认为“今天”是至关重要的,而教父的观点认为“今天”是本体论的救赎,而现代的观点认为“今天”是享乐主义的。上帝赋予这个世界的时间只是一个稍纵即逝的间隔,是为了使它臻于完美而在永恒的生命中保持不变。但是,世界在时间上的这种状况,或者它在对完美的回顾中具有变化的天赋,意味着它没有任何基本的本质或任何其他本质,因为,在这种情况下,它不可能走向完美,而是由一位永远完美的个人造物主从无到有创造出来的,他通过他的力量的完美,或者通过与他不断增加的交流,为他植入了她对他的渴望。基督教的时间哲学方法是对失去灵魂的灵性的回答,他们被像Covid - 19这样的世俗生活事件吓坏了。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dialogo
Dialogo SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信