Intraoperative Analgesia Guided by the Nociception Level (NOL) in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Preliminary Outcome Study

Tzour Arik, González Olalla Figueiredo
{"title":"Intraoperative Analgesia Guided by the Nociception Level (NOL) in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Preliminary Outcome Study","authors":"Tzour Arik, González Olalla Figueiredo","doi":"10.36959/377/368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Most of postoperative patients report moderate to severe pain, possibly related to opioid underdosing or overdosing during surgery. Nociception Level (NOL) Index has been proposed for the evaluation of the nociceptionantinociception balance in the perioperative period and by that, may lead to a more appropriate analgesic regimen. NOL-index is scaled from 0 to 100; with previous studies suggesting that values >25 can indicate inadequate analgesia. We designed a NOL-guided and Observational study, 2-cohort (retrospective and prospective) trial to test the hypothesis that protocol-driven intraoperative analgesia guided by NOL during laparoscopic colorectal surgery would improve and reduce titration of intraoperative analgesics. Method: This monocentric, observational, and guided study aimed to compare perioperative data during laparoscopic colorectal surgery with or without the use of NOL monitor (NOL-guided vs. Control group). Intraoperative analgesia was provided by injection of fentanyl, which was performed according to the clinician’s assessment in the Control group or to the NOL monitor in the NOL-guided group. The primary outcome was a reduction in fentanyl consumption during surgery in the NOL-guided group. Results: Between 2017 and 2019, 70 patients (i.e., 36 in the Control group and 34 patients in the NOL-guided group) were included. The mean consumption fentanyl was significantly lower in the NOL-guided group (450mg) versus 600mg in the Control group (P = 0.005). Median postoperative pain score in T0, when the patient woke up in the operation room, was2 (inter-quartile range 0-5) and 0 (0-4) in Control and NOL-guided group, respectively (p=0.132). Conclusion: The NOL index in laparoscopic colorectal surgery decreased with incremental fentanyl doses during sevoflurane anaesthesia. This reduction in the intraoperative analgesia suggests its interesting potential as a nociception monitor during general anaesthesia (GA). Future studies should employ more robust design, be appropriately powered and seek to follow longer term outcomes.","PeriodicalId":92399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and pain management","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/377/368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Most of postoperative patients report moderate to severe pain, possibly related to opioid underdosing or overdosing during surgery. Nociception Level (NOL) Index has been proposed for the evaluation of the nociceptionantinociception balance in the perioperative period and by that, may lead to a more appropriate analgesic regimen. NOL-index is scaled from 0 to 100; with previous studies suggesting that values >25 can indicate inadequate analgesia. We designed a NOL-guided and Observational study, 2-cohort (retrospective and prospective) trial to test the hypothesis that protocol-driven intraoperative analgesia guided by NOL during laparoscopic colorectal surgery would improve and reduce titration of intraoperative analgesics. Method: This monocentric, observational, and guided study aimed to compare perioperative data during laparoscopic colorectal surgery with or without the use of NOL monitor (NOL-guided vs. Control group). Intraoperative analgesia was provided by injection of fentanyl, which was performed according to the clinician’s assessment in the Control group or to the NOL monitor in the NOL-guided group. The primary outcome was a reduction in fentanyl consumption during surgery in the NOL-guided group. Results: Between 2017 and 2019, 70 patients (i.e., 36 in the Control group and 34 patients in the NOL-guided group) were included. The mean consumption fentanyl was significantly lower in the NOL-guided group (450mg) versus 600mg in the Control group (P = 0.005). Median postoperative pain score in T0, when the patient woke up in the operation room, was2 (inter-quartile range 0-5) and 0 (0-4) in Control and NOL-guided group, respectively (p=0.132). Conclusion: The NOL index in laparoscopic colorectal surgery decreased with incremental fentanyl doses during sevoflurane anaesthesia. This reduction in the intraoperative analgesia suggests its interesting potential as a nociception monitor during general anaesthesia (GA). Future studies should employ more robust design, be appropriately powered and seek to follow longer term outcomes.
腹腔镜结直肠手术中由伤害感觉水平(NOL)引导的术中镇痛:一项初步结果研究
大多数术后患者报告中度至重度疼痛,可能与手术期间阿片类药物剂量不足或过量有关。痛觉水平(NOL)指数被提出用于评估围手术期的痛觉与抗痛觉平衡,从而指导更合适的镇痛方案。noli指数从0到100;先前的研究表明,bbb25值可能表明镇痛不足。我们设计了一项NOL引导的观察性研究,2个队列(回顾性和前瞻性)试验,以验证腹腔镜结直肠手术中NOL引导的方案驱动的术中镇痛可以改善和减少术中镇痛的滴定。方法:这项单中心、观察性和指导性研究旨在比较使用或不使用NOL监测仪的腹腔镜结直肠手术围手术期数据(NOL引导组与对照组)。术中给予芬太尼注射镇痛,对照组根据临床医生评估,NOL引导组给予NOL监测。主要结果是在nno引导组手术期间芬太尼用量的减少。结果:2017 - 2019年共纳入70例患者(对照组36例,nol引导组34例)。一氧化氮引导组的芬太尼平均消耗量(450mg)显著低于对照组的600mg (P = 0.005)。术后疼痛评分中位数(T0),患者在手术室醒来时,对照组为2(四分位数范围0-5),nno引导组为0(四分位数范围0-4),差异有统计学意义(p=0.132)。结论:七氟醚麻醉下,腹腔镜结直肠手术NOL指数随芬太尼剂量的增加而降低。术中镇痛的减少表明其在全身麻醉(GA)期间作为伤害感觉监测的有趣潜力。未来的研究应采用更稳健的设计,适当的动力,并寻求长期的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信