Understanding Field Performance of Paraffin Inhibitors Using Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Matthew Shuya, Holley Baron, Cristino Tiberio
{"title":"Understanding Field Performance of Paraffin Inhibitors Using Differential Scanning Calorimetry","authors":"Matthew Shuya, Holley Baron, Cristino Tiberio","doi":"10.2118/208978-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The standard test procedure for paraffin inhibitor evaluations in oil and gas production over the past 20 years has been cold finger analysis. With the emergence of unconventional Canadian oil and gas production from tight reservoirs such as the Montney and Duvernay formations, mounting paraffin treatment issues have been observed. The limitations of cold finger analysis have become increasingly evident when relating product evaluation data to field performance data. Baker Hughes has developed a method to evaluate paraffin inhibitors using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) that exhibits key improvements over cold finger analysis. The results of an investigation between product evaluation testing through DSC and field performance data is presented.\n DSC analysis is commonly used in the oil and gas industry for cloud point or wax appearance temperature (WAT) determination of crude oil by detecting the point at which paraffin crystals form. It has commonly been presumed that detection of cloud point shifting can be accomplished with paraffin inhibitor chemistries; however, contradictory evidence obtained through thorough investigation within the industry refutes this claim. This is due to the fact that standard paraffin inhibitors work to disrupt paraffin crystal growth and agglomeration, instead of paraffin crystal suppression.\n Many programs identified through DSC testing methodology have been successfully implemented in a variety of field applications including both conventional and unconventional production. Moreover, field application monitoring data correlates to product selection and treatment rate data obtained through DSC analysis far better than results acquired through cold finger analysis. Additionally, analysis through DSC is far less susceptible to commonly experienced interferences observed in cold finger analysis such as high asphaltene content of specific crude oils, or paraffin content of condensate.\n Paraffin inhibitor evaluation through DSC allows for improved understanding of intended paraffin inhibitor programs for oil and gas producers, especially those experiencing difficult to treat paraffin issues in higher temperature tight reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":11077,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, March 17, 2022","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, March 17, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208978-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standard test procedure for paraffin inhibitor evaluations in oil and gas production over the past 20 years has been cold finger analysis. With the emergence of unconventional Canadian oil and gas production from tight reservoirs such as the Montney and Duvernay formations, mounting paraffin treatment issues have been observed. The limitations of cold finger analysis have become increasingly evident when relating product evaluation data to field performance data. Baker Hughes has developed a method to evaluate paraffin inhibitors using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) that exhibits key improvements over cold finger analysis. The results of an investigation between product evaluation testing through DSC and field performance data is presented. DSC analysis is commonly used in the oil and gas industry for cloud point or wax appearance temperature (WAT) determination of crude oil by detecting the point at which paraffin crystals form. It has commonly been presumed that detection of cloud point shifting can be accomplished with paraffin inhibitor chemistries; however, contradictory evidence obtained through thorough investigation within the industry refutes this claim. This is due to the fact that standard paraffin inhibitors work to disrupt paraffin crystal growth and agglomeration, instead of paraffin crystal suppression. Many programs identified through DSC testing methodology have been successfully implemented in a variety of field applications including both conventional and unconventional production. Moreover, field application monitoring data correlates to product selection and treatment rate data obtained through DSC analysis far better than results acquired through cold finger analysis. Additionally, analysis through DSC is far less susceptible to commonly experienced interferences observed in cold finger analysis such as high asphaltene content of specific crude oils, or paraffin content of condensate. Paraffin inhibitor evaluation through DSC allows for improved understanding of intended paraffin inhibitor programs for oil and gas producers, especially those experiencing difficult to treat paraffin issues in higher temperature tight reservoirs.
用差示扫描量热法了解石蜡抑制剂的现场性能
在过去的20年里,油气生产中对石蜡抑制剂评价的标准测试程序一直是冷指分析。随着加拿大致密储层(如Montney和Duvernay地层)非常规油气生产的出现,人们发现越来越多的石蜡处理问题。当将产品评估数据与现场性能数据相关联时,冷手指分析的局限性变得越来越明显。贝克休斯开发了一种利用差示扫描量热法(DSC)评估石蜡抑制剂的方法,该方法比冷指分析方法有了重大改进。介绍了DSC产品评价测试与现场性能数据之间的调查结果。DSC分析通常用于石油和天然气工业,通过检测石蜡晶体形成的点来测定原油的云点或蜡样温度(WAT)。人们通常认为,可以用石蜡抑制剂来检测云点移动;然而,通过行业内部的深入调查获得的相互矛盾的证据反驳了这一说法。这是由于标准石蜡抑制剂的作用是破坏石蜡晶体的生长和团聚,而不是抑制石蜡晶体。通过DSC测试方法确定的许多方案已经成功地在各种油田应用中实施,包括常规和非常规生产。此外,通过DSC分析获得的现场应用监测数据与产品选择的相关性和处理率数据远优于通过冷指分析获得的结果。此外,DSC分析不容易受到冷指分析中常见的干扰,如特定原油的高沥青质含量或凝析油的高石蜡含量。通过DSC对石蜡抑制剂进行评估,可以更好地了解油气生产商的石蜡抑制剂计划,特别是那些在高温致密储层中难以处理石蜡问题的生产商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信