Plastic Wastes as a Raw Material in the Concrete Mix: An Alternative Approach to Manage Plastic Wastes in Developing Countries

Y. Adela, Mohamed Berhanu, B. Gobena
{"title":"Plastic Wastes as a Raw Material in the Concrete Mix: An Alternative Approach to Manage Plastic Wastes in Developing Countries","authors":"Y. Adela, Mohamed Berhanu, B. Gobena","doi":"10.35248/2252-5211.20.10.382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The twenty-first century can be marked as a “plastic era” where different sectors are producing and consuming a huge amount of plastic. Concurrently, the plastic waste generation rate has been increasing and causing serious problems on the public health and ecosystem. Hence, recycling of plastic wastes can be one alternative management option for this peculiar waste stream. This study aims to evaluate the technical feasibility of plastic wastes as a partial replacement of coarse aggregate in a concrete mix using volcanic pumice as an admixture. Concrete test specimens prepared with standard M20 mix design were measured for a compressive and split tensile strength. Plastic aggregate made from plastic bags and bottles has shown a different degree of workability to replace the concrete mix. The compressive and split tensile strength tends to decrease with increasing the ratio of plastic aggregates for both types of plastics. However, the curve based operational cut-off value shows that the plastic bag and bottle aggregates can replace coarse aggregate from 11-14% and 35-37.5% respectively. Conclusively, utilizing the plastic aggregates as a partial replacement of coarse aggregate is technically feasible. However, applying the nominal concrete standard mix proportion is seemingly inappropriate while plastic aggregates used as an aggregate which in turn require a specific mix design. Despite the percent replacement is low, utilizing waste plastics in the concrete mix would help countries with the weak waste management system.","PeriodicalId":14393,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Waste Resources","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Waste Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2252-5211.20.10.382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The twenty-first century can be marked as a “plastic era” where different sectors are producing and consuming a huge amount of plastic. Concurrently, the plastic waste generation rate has been increasing and causing serious problems on the public health and ecosystem. Hence, recycling of plastic wastes can be one alternative management option for this peculiar waste stream. This study aims to evaluate the technical feasibility of plastic wastes as a partial replacement of coarse aggregate in a concrete mix using volcanic pumice as an admixture. Concrete test specimens prepared with standard M20 mix design were measured for a compressive and split tensile strength. Plastic aggregate made from plastic bags and bottles has shown a different degree of workability to replace the concrete mix. The compressive and split tensile strength tends to decrease with increasing the ratio of plastic aggregates for both types of plastics. However, the curve based operational cut-off value shows that the plastic bag and bottle aggregates can replace coarse aggregate from 11-14% and 35-37.5% respectively. Conclusively, utilizing the plastic aggregates as a partial replacement of coarse aggregate is technically feasible. However, applying the nominal concrete standard mix proportion is seemingly inappropriate while plastic aggregates used as an aggregate which in turn require a specific mix design. Despite the percent replacement is low, utilizing waste plastics in the concrete mix would help countries with the weak waste management system.
作为混凝土混合原料的塑料废物:发展中国家管理塑料废物的另一种方法
21世纪可以被标记为“塑料时代”,不同的部门正在生产和消耗大量的塑料。与此同时,塑料垃圾的产生率一直在上升,对公共健康和生态系统造成了严重的问题。因此,塑料废物的回收可以成为这种特殊废物流的另一种管理选择。本研究的目的是评估塑料废物作为粗骨料在使用火山浮石作为外加剂的混凝土混合物部分替代的技术可行性。采用标准M20配合比设计配制混凝土试件,对其抗压强度和劈裂抗拉强度进行了测试。由塑料袋和塑料瓶制成的塑料骨料已显示出不同程度的和易性,以取代混凝土混合料。两种塑料的抗压强度和劈裂抗拉强度均随骨料掺量的增加而降低。而基于曲线的操作截断值表明,塑料袋骨料和瓶骨料替代粗骨料的比例分别为11-14%和35-37.5%。最后,利用塑性骨料部分替代粗骨料在技术上是可行的。然而,采用标称混凝土标准配合比似乎是不合适的,而塑料骨料作为骨料,反过来需要一个具体的配合比设计。尽管替换率很低,但在混凝土混合物中使用废塑料将有助于废物管理系统薄弱的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信