Advantages of Multistage Frac Completion in Vertical Depleted Gas Wells and Lessons Learned

E. Sayapov, A. Nunez, Masoud Al Salmi, Ibrahim Al Farei, H. Gheilani, Ahmed Benchekor, A. Al-Shanfari
{"title":"Advantages of Multistage Frac Completion in Vertical Depleted Gas Wells and Lessons Learned","authors":"E. Sayapov, A. Nunez, Masoud Al Salmi, Ibrahim Al Farei, H. Gheilani, Ahmed Benchekor, A. Al-Shanfari","doi":"10.2118/194871-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Multistage frac completion (MFC) has been playing a significant role in modern oilfield industry being one of the key tools making development of low permeable formations economical. Commonly, it is applied in horizontal wells that are drilled to compensate for reduced drainage radius of these wells due to a lack of formation conductivity. This technique is evolving, there are quite a few inventions introduced every year that make MFC easier, more economical and that allow the operators to control and precisely evaluate both the treatment itself and performance of the created fractures. However, due to its nature and initial focus on horizontal wells, it did not become very popular in vertical wells. One of the reasons for it is its limited formation access since the sleeves that are providing the access are short and cannot cover the entire net pay. What historically more common in vertical wells are either conventional \"plug and perf\" approach or its modifications, whereas intervals are perforated with either coiled tubing and sand-blasting perforation or wireline guns, while isolation of the zones is achieved by setting frac plugs, sand plugs or frac packers depending on pumping conduits. In Petroleum Development Oman, some of these vertical wells were stimulated via multistage frac completion.\n In central part of the Sultanate of Oman, a deep tight gas field is developed using hydraulic fracture stimulation technique since the formation conductivity is low and the near wellbore damage after drilling is making it even worse. Normally, between 6 and 13 frac intervals are stimulated in each well. Majority of wells are completed vertically with pay zones separated with strong shale layers that restrict fracture height development. Since plug & perf has been the main technique used in this field, there are multiple well interventions during hydraulic fracture operations that consume time, money and delay the well delivery. Moreover, the depletion of the field and its main productive zones make well intervention activities much more challenging whereas the risks of getting coiled tubing string or even wireline tools stuck in wellbore are high due to immediate losses faced after opening those low pressurized zones having as low as 8,000 KPa formation pressure, which can be 5-7 times less than hydrostatic pressures in the wellbore depending on depths and fluid s used. At the same time, with downhole temperatures ranging from 135 to 150 deg C and fracturing pressures reaching around 145,000 KPa bottomhole (~21,000 psi), differential pressures across the target zones can reach enormous levels of 15,000-20,000psi. Conditions in general become very risky, making it extremely difficult to source the right tools and equipment from what is available on the market. Another challenge associated with depletion of this field is an effective deliquification of the wells after stimulation treatments to allow them to effectively get rid of frac fluids and be able to produce gas to surface.\n By deploying multistage frac completion with the objective of producing, enhancing and cost/time savings, the effectiveness of the fracturing operations was expected to increase. Multistage frac completion allows the frac operation to be continuously performed without the need to conduct well interventions such as running/setting frac plugs, perforating, milling and clean out between intervals. If needed so, the intervention activities can be completed after frac operations. Equipment selection and completion design were performed based on well conditions, market availabilities, operational parameters and composition of the produced gas. However, this technique is associated with its specific challenges that require attention and tailored solutions. The main challenge in deployment of this system in vertical wells is the accurate positioning of the sleeves. The shale layers between the pay zones could be as narrow as 5 m or less and a small pay zone can be easily missed. Besides, deployment and cementing operations are equally essential because of water zones embedded in between the pays.\n This paper is discussing the recognized benefits and lessons learned from utilization of multistage frac completion in vertical deep (around 5000 m) depleted tight gas wells covering the completion and hydraulic fracturing stimulation operations. This technique has industry proven cost & time reduction and efficiency gain, as well as faster well cleanup and reduced HSE exposure contributing to better gas recovery, improvement in operator's performance and energy delivery to the country; it was expected to demonstrate a step change in the efficiency compared to conventional approach to the field development.","PeriodicalId":11321,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194871-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multistage frac completion (MFC) has been playing a significant role in modern oilfield industry being one of the key tools making development of low permeable formations economical. Commonly, it is applied in horizontal wells that are drilled to compensate for reduced drainage radius of these wells due to a lack of formation conductivity. This technique is evolving, there are quite a few inventions introduced every year that make MFC easier, more economical and that allow the operators to control and precisely evaluate both the treatment itself and performance of the created fractures. However, due to its nature and initial focus on horizontal wells, it did not become very popular in vertical wells. One of the reasons for it is its limited formation access since the sleeves that are providing the access are short and cannot cover the entire net pay. What historically more common in vertical wells are either conventional "plug and perf" approach or its modifications, whereas intervals are perforated with either coiled tubing and sand-blasting perforation or wireline guns, while isolation of the zones is achieved by setting frac plugs, sand plugs or frac packers depending on pumping conduits. In Petroleum Development Oman, some of these vertical wells were stimulated via multistage frac completion. In central part of the Sultanate of Oman, a deep tight gas field is developed using hydraulic fracture stimulation technique since the formation conductivity is low and the near wellbore damage after drilling is making it even worse. Normally, between 6 and 13 frac intervals are stimulated in each well. Majority of wells are completed vertically with pay zones separated with strong shale layers that restrict fracture height development. Since plug & perf has been the main technique used in this field, there are multiple well interventions during hydraulic fracture operations that consume time, money and delay the well delivery. Moreover, the depletion of the field and its main productive zones make well intervention activities much more challenging whereas the risks of getting coiled tubing string or even wireline tools stuck in wellbore are high due to immediate losses faced after opening those low pressurized zones having as low as 8,000 KPa formation pressure, which can be 5-7 times less than hydrostatic pressures in the wellbore depending on depths and fluid s used. At the same time, with downhole temperatures ranging from 135 to 150 deg C and fracturing pressures reaching around 145,000 KPa bottomhole (~21,000 psi), differential pressures across the target zones can reach enormous levels of 15,000-20,000psi. Conditions in general become very risky, making it extremely difficult to source the right tools and equipment from what is available on the market. Another challenge associated with depletion of this field is an effective deliquification of the wells after stimulation treatments to allow them to effectively get rid of frac fluids and be able to produce gas to surface. By deploying multistage frac completion with the objective of producing, enhancing and cost/time savings, the effectiveness of the fracturing operations was expected to increase. Multistage frac completion allows the frac operation to be continuously performed without the need to conduct well interventions such as running/setting frac plugs, perforating, milling and clean out between intervals. If needed so, the intervention activities can be completed after frac operations. Equipment selection and completion design were performed based on well conditions, market availabilities, operational parameters and composition of the produced gas. However, this technique is associated with its specific challenges that require attention and tailored solutions. The main challenge in deployment of this system in vertical wells is the accurate positioning of the sleeves. The shale layers between the pay zones could be as narrow as 5 m or less and a small pay zone can be easily missed. Besides, deployment and cementing operations are equally essential because of water zones embedded in between the pays. This paper is discussing the recognized benefits and lessons learned from utilization of multistage frac completion in vertical deep (around 5000 m) depleted tight gas wells covering the completion and hydraulic fracturing stimulation operations. This technique has industry proven cost & time reduction and efficiency gain, as well as faster well cleanup and reduced HSE exposure contributing to better gas recovery, improvement in operator's performance and energy delivery to the country; it was expected to demonstrate a step change in the efficiency compared to conventional approach to the field development.
垂直枯竭气井多级压裂完井的优势及经验教训
多级压裂完井作为低渗透地层经济开发的关键工具之一,在现代油田工业中发挥着重要作用。通常,它应用于水平井中,以弥补由于地层导电性不足而导致的水平井泄油半径减小。这项技术正在不断发展,每年都有相当多的发明,使MFC更容易、更经济,并且允许操作人员控制和精确评估处理本身和所形成的裂缝的性能。然而,由于它的性质和最初的重点是水平井,它并没有在直井中得到很好的应用。其原因之一是由于提供通道的滑套很短,无法覆盖整个净产层,因此地层进入受限。在直井中,通常采用传统的“桥塞射孔”方法或对其进行改进,而段段则使用连续油管和喷砂射孔或电缆射孔枪进行射孔,同时根据泵送管道设置压裂桥塞、砂塞或压裂封隔器来实现区域隔离。在阿曼石油开发公司,一些直井通过多级压裂完井进行增产。在阿曼苏丹国中部,由于地层导电性较低,钻井后近井损害更严重,采用水力压裂增产技术开发了一个深层致密气田。通常情况下,每口井需要增产6 ~ 13个压裂段。大多数井是垂直完井,产层与强页岩层分隔,限制了裂缝高度的发展。由于桥塞射孔一直是该领域使用的主要技术,因此在水力压裂作业中,需要进行多次井干预,这既耗时又费钱,还会延迟油井的交付。此外,油田及其主要生产区域的枯竭使油井干预活动更具挑战性,而由于打开低至8,000 KPa地层压力的低压区域后面临的直接损失,连续油管甚至电缆工具卡在井筒中的风险很高,根据深度和使用的流体,该压力可能比井眼静水压力低5-7倍。同时,由于井下温度范围为135 ~ 150℃,压裂压力达到145,000 KPa左右(~21,000 psi),目标层间的压差可以达到15,000 ~ 20,000psi的巨大水平。总的来说,情况变得非常危险,这使得从市场上找到合适的工具和设备变得极其困难。与该油田枯竭相关的另一个挑战是在增产处理后对井进行有效的脱水处理,使其能够有效地摆脱压裂液,并能够将气体生产到地面。通过采用多级压裂完井技术,以达到增产、增产和节省成本/时间的目的,压裂作业的效率有望提高。多级压裂完井可以连续进行压裂作业,而无需进行井干预,例如下入/坐封压裂桥塞、射孔、磨铣和清洗。如果需要,修井作业可以在压裂作业后完成。根据井况、市场供应情况、操作参数和产气成分进行设备选择和完井设计。然而,该技术与需要关注和定制解决方案的特定挑战相关。在直井中部署该系统的主要挑战是滑套的精确定位。产层之间的页岩层可能窄至5米或更小,小的产层很容易被遗漏。此外,由于储层与储层之间存在水层,部署和固井作业同样至关重要。本文讨论了在垂直深度(约5000米)枯竭致密气井中使用多级压裂完井的公认效益和经验教训,包括完井和水力压裂增产作业。该技术经过行业验证,降低了成本和时间,提高了效率,加快了油井清理速度,减少了HSE风险,从而提高了天然气采收率,提高了作业者的业绩,并提高了向该国的能源输送;与传统的油田开发方法相比,该方法有望在效率方面取得阶段性的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信