Illness: Narratives, Imagery, and Politics

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE
Daniele Monticelli
{"title":"Illness: Narratives, Imagery, and Politics","authors":"Daniele Monticelli","doi":"10.7592/fejf2021.83.monticelli","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article uses the review of a seminar, an exhibition, and a graduate conference, which took place at Tallinn University in the 2020–2021 academic year, as an occasion to reflect on the different ways in which illness has been represented in literature, the arts, and film across the history of Western culture. The specific focus of the article is on the theoretical contribution of the humanities to a more complex and adequate understanding of the phenomenon of illness. The study of illness narratives reveals different patterns and strategies of constructing the illness experience into a coherent and meaningful story, but also the resistance that the disruptive impact of illness on our everyday lives poses to narrativisation. The complex historical imagery which endows the biological fact of being sick with additional cultural and social meaning has also to be critically investigated in the humanities and social sciences. Metaphors about illness and the use of illness as a socio-political metaphor have often had a nefarious impact on sick people as well as entire social groups and communities. This is why the article also considers illness in its relations with politics and power and describes various attempts to empower sick people in their relations with medical institutions and their social environment. The article ends with a review of the “Illness: Narratives, Imagery, Politics” graduate conference (27–28 January 2021), which is a good illustration of the many literary and artistic works and of the plurality of methods that can be used in the study of the illness phenomenon from a humanities perspective.","PeriodicalId":42641,"journal":{"name":"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7592/fejf2021.83.monticelli","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article uses the review of a seminar, an exhibition, and a graduate conference, which took place at Tallinn University in the 2020–2021 academic year, as an occasion to reflect on the different ways in which illness has been represented in literature, the arts, and film across the history of Western culture. The specific focus of the article is on the theoretical contribution of the humanities to a more complex and adequate understanding of the phenomenon of illness. The study of illness narratives reveals different patterns and strategies of constructing the illness experience into a coherent and meaningful story, but also the resistance that the disruptive impact of illness on our everyday lives poses to narrativisation. The complex historical imagery which endows the biological fact of being sick with additional cultural and social meaning has also to be critically investigated in the humanities and social sciences. Metaphors about illness and the use of illness as a socio-political metaphor have often had a nefarious impact on sick people as well as entire social groups and communities. This is why the article also considers illness in its relations with politics and power and describes various attempts to empower sick people in their relations with medical institutions and their social environment. The article ends with a review of the “Illness: Narratives, Imagery, Politics” graduate conference (27–28 January 2021), which is a good illustration of the many literary and artistic works and of the plurality of methods that can be used in the study of the illness phenomenon from a humanities perspective.
疾病:叙事、意象和政治
本文回顾了2020-2021学年在塔林大学举行的一次研讨会、一次展览和一次研究生会议,以此反思西方文化史上文学、艺术和电影中疾病的不同表现方式。这篇文章的具体重点是人文学科对更复杂和充分理解疾病现象的理论贡献。对疾病叙事的研究揭示了将疾病经历构建成连贯而有意义的故事的不同模式和策略,但也揭示了疾病对我们日常生活的破坏性影响对叙事的抵制。复杂的历史意象赋予了生病的生物学事实额外的文化和社会意义,也必须在人文和社会科学中进行批判性的研究。关于疾病的隐喻以及将疾病作为一种社会政治隐喻的使用往往对病人以及整个社会群体和社区产生了邪恶的影响。这就是为什么这篇文章还考虑了疾病与政治和权力的关系,并描述了在病人与医疗机构及其社会环境的关系中赋予病人权力的各种尝试。文章最后回顾了“疾病:叙事、意象、政治”研究生会议(2021年1月27日至28日),这是一个很好的例证,说明了许多文学和艺术作品,以及从人文角度研究疾病现象的多种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信