The Uncertain Future: Sino-Russian Relations in the Twenty-First Century

Q2 Social Sciences
H. Pirchner
{"title":"The Uncertain Future: Sino-Russian Relations in the Twenty-First Century","authors":"H. Pirchner","doi":"10.3200/DEMO.16.4.309-322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two countries top almost everyone's list of nations that are most important to the United States. One has been a rapidly ascendant power for more than twenty years. The other has only recently begun to recover from the collapse of its empire. One is important because of its size and fast-growing economic and military power. The other's importance is based on its impressive nuclear arsenal, huge petroleum assets, and strategic location. These countries are China and Russia.The United States pursues its relationship with both countries in a bilateral fashion. However, the status of Russia and China's relationship with one another has the ability to dramatically impact the United States' relations with both countries. For example, the Nixon-era cooperation between China and the United States occurred in part because of China's fear of war with the much stronger Soviet Union. By the late 1990s, improved Sino-Russian relations led to a common diplomatic front against a variety of U.S. interests.An Uneasy AllianceA few years later, Russia's move toward the United States after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks was, to some degree, encouraged by Russia's interest in hedging its bets should relations with China sour. By 2007, however, the United States' preemptive war in Iraq and American support of the color revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine deeply alarmed Russia's national security establishment, which fears further American political or military action in the former Soviet republics-territories in which Russia wishes to be the dominant foreign power. Russia has sought to counteract this trend by drawing closer to China to offset U.S. unpredictability and \"meddling\" in former Soviet territory, which many Russians view as their backyard.1 Nevertheless, however bold the Sino-Russian pronouncements on the need for a multipolar world may be, the countries' interaction in other areas reflects caution, if not deep-seated distrust. This wariness will continue to mitigate the intensity of Russia's cooperation with China in opposition to U.S. interests.In formulating U.S. policy toward both countries, it is indispensable to know how the Sino-Russian relationship will evolve-and why.Over the last decade, cooperation between Russia and China has increased dramatically. It now includes military sales, joint military research and development, common diplomatic positions (e.g., Chechnya, Taiwan, U.S. missile defense), nonmilitary trade, and the settlement of border issues. To a large extent, this cooperation was formally codified in the July 16, 2001, Russia-China Treaty on Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation.2As in previous treaties, (e.g., the 1689 Treaty of Nerchinsk, the 1858 Treaty of Aigun, and the 1860 Treaty of Beijing), this agreement between China and Russia was driven primarily by a mutual need for:(1) Peace on the border. As long as a Sino-American conflict over Taiwan remains a possibility, China does not want to commit the resources necessary to protect its 3,645 km (2,264 mile) border with Russia. For Russia, after the Soviet Union's collapse, Moscow had neither the money nor the desire to station large numbers of troops along its border with China; and(2) Increased trade. In the 1990s, Russia was the only country willing and able to supply China with the sophisticated military equipment and technology it coveted. Additionally, China's shortages of lumber, various ores, and petroleum products were filled through Russian production. This was fully compatible with cash-starved Russia's need to keep key industries, such as aircrafts and lumber, viable through the sale of resources and arms to China.These reasons do not completely explain the rationale for the treaty, however. According to Alexander Yakovlev, a China expert from the Russian Academy of Sciences: \"Diplomats know any such treaty is always signed with a clear understanding about who is the real adversary. …","PeriodicalId":39667,"journal":{"name":"Demokratizatsiya","volume":"76 1","pages":"309-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demokratizatsiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.16.4.309-322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Two countries top almost everyone's list of nations that are most important to the United States. One has been a rapidly ascendant power for more than twenty years. The other has only recently begun to recover from the collapse of its empire. One is important because of its size and fast-growing economic and military power. The other's importance is based on its impressive nuclear arsenal, huge petroleum assets, and strategic location. These countries are China and Russia.The United States pursues its relationship with both countries in a bilateral fashion. However, the status of Russia and China's relationship with one another has the ability to dramatically impact the United States' relations with both countries. For example, the Nixon-era cooperation between China and the United States occurred in part because of China's fear of war with the much stronger Soviet Union. By the late 1990s, improved Sino-Russian relations led to a common diplomatic front against a variety of U.S. interests.An Uneasy AllianceA few years later, Russia's move toward the United States after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks was, to some degree, encouraged by Russia's interest in hedging its bets should relations with China sour. By 2007, however, the United States' preemptive war in Iraq and American support of the color revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine deeply alarmed Russia's national security establishment, which fears further American political or military action in the former Soviet republics-territories in which Russia wishes to be the dominant foreign power. Russia has sought to counteract this trend by drawing closer to China to offset U.S. unpredictability and "meddling" in former Soviet territory, which many Russians view as their backyard.1 Nevertheless, however bold the Sino-Russian pronouncements on the need for a multipolar world may be, the countries' interaction in other areas reflects caution, if not deep-seated distrust. This wariness will continue to mitigate the intensity of Russia's cooperation with China in opposition to U.S. interests.In formulating U.S. policy toward both countries, it is indispensable to know how the Sino-Russian relationship will evolve-and why.Over the last decade, cooperation between Russia and China has increased dramatically. It now includes military sales, joint military research and development, common diplomatic positions (e.g., Chechnya, Taiwan, U.S. missile defense), nonmilitary trade, and the settlement of border issues. To a large extent, this cooperation was formally codified in the July 16, 2001, Russia-China Treaty on Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation.2As in previous treaties, (e.g., the 1689 Treaty of Nerchinsk, the 1858 Treaty of Aigun, and the 1860 Treaty of Beijing), this agreement between China and Russia was driven primarily by a mutual need for:(1) Peace on the border. As long as a Sino-American conflict over Taiwan remains a possibility, China does not want to commit the resources necessary to protect its 3,645 km (2,264 mile) border with Russia. For Russia, after the Soviet Union's collapse, Moscow had neither the money nor the desire to station large numbers of troops along its border with China; and(2) Increased trade. In the 1990s, Russia was the only country willing and able to supply China with the sophisticated military equipment and technology it coveted. Additionally, China's shortages of lumber, various ores, and petroleum products were filled through Russian production. This was fully compatible with cash-starved Russia's need to keep key industries, such as aircrafts and lumber, viable through the sale of resources and arms to China.These reasons do not completely explain the rationale for the treaty, however. According to Alexander Yakovlev, a China expert from the Russian Academy of Sciences: "Diplomats know any such treaty is always signed with a clear understanding about who is the real adversary. …
不确定的未来:21世纪的中俄关系
有两个国家在几乎所有人对美国最重要的国家名单上名列前茅。20多年来,中国一直是一个迅速崛起的大国。另一个直到最近才开始从帝国的崩溃中恢复过来。一个国家之所以重要,是因为它的规模和快速增长的经济和军事实力。另一个的重要性是基于其令人印象深刻的核武库、巨大的石油资产和战略位置。这两个国家是中国和俄罗斯。美国以双边方式发展与这两个国家的关系。然而,俄罗斯和中国彼此关系的现状有可能极大地影响美国与这两个国家的关系。例如,尼克松时代中美之间的合作,部分原因是中国害怕与强大得多的苏联开战。到1990年代后期,中俄关系的改善导致了共同的外交战线对抗美国的各种利益。几年后,在2001年9月11日的恐怖袭击之后,俄罗斯向美国靠拢,在某种程度上,这是由于俄罗斯希望在与中国的关系恶化时对冲自己的赌注。然而,到了2007年,美国对伊拉克的先发制人的战争,以及美国对格鲁吉亚和乌克兰颜色革命的支持,深深震惊了俄罗斯的国家安全机构,他们担心美国在前苏联加盟共和国采取进一步的政治或军事行动——俄罗斯希望在这些地区成为占主导地位的外国势力。俄罗斯试图通过与中国走得更近来抵消美国的不可预测性和对前苏联领土的“干涉”,以抵消这一趋势,许多俄罗斯人认为这是他们的后院然而,无论中俄就多极世界的必要性发表多么大胆的声明,两国在其他领域的互动反映出了谨慎,甚至是根深蒂固的不信任。这种谨慎将继续降低俄罗斯与中国在反对美国利益方面的合作强度。在制定美国对这两个国家的政策时,了解中俄关系将如何发展及其原因是必不可少的。在过去的十年中,俄中两国之间的合作急剧增加。它现在包括军售、联合军事研发、共同外交立场(如车臣、台湾、美国导弹防御系统)、非军事贸易和边界问题的解决。在很大程度上,这一合作在2001年7月16日的《中俄睦邻友好合作条约》中得到了正式的规定。2与以前的条约(如1689年的《尼布钦斯克条约》、1858年的《爱琴海条约》和1860年的《北京条约》)一样,中俄之间的这一协议主要是由双方对以下方面的需要所驱动的:(1)边境和平。只要中美在台湾问题上仍有可能发生冲突,中国就不愿投入必要的资源来保护其与俄罗斯3645公里(2264英里)的边境线。对俄罗斯来说,在苏联解体后,莫斯科既没有资金也没有意愿在与中国接壤的边境地区部署大量军队;(2)贸易增长。在20世纪90年代,俄罗斯是唯一一个愿意并且能够向中国提供其梦寐以求的尖端军事装备和技术的国家。此外,中国的木材,各种矿石和石油产品的短缺是通过俄罗斯的生产来填补的。这完全符合资金匮乏的俄罗斯需要通过向中国出售资源和武器来维持飞机和木材等关键行业的生存。然而,这些理由并不能完全解释该条约的基本原理。俄罗斯科学院(Russian Academy of Sciences)中国问题专家亚历山大•雅科夫列夫(Alexander Yakovlev)表示:“外交官们知道,任何此类条约的签署,都清楚地知道谁是真正的对手。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Demokratizatsiya
Demokratizatsiya Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Occupying a unique niche among literary journals, ANQ is filled with short, incisive research-based articles about the literature of the English-speaking world and the language of literature. Contributors unravel obscure allusions, explain sources and analogues, and supply variant manuscript readings. Also included are Old English word studies, textual emendations, and rare correspondence from neglected archives. The journal is an essential source for professors and students, as well as archivists, bibliographers, biographers, editors, lexicographers, and textual scholars. With subjects from Chaucer and Milton to Fitzgerald and Welty, ANQ delves into the heart of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信