Patients in insulin analogues use via judicial litigation: do they use the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS)?

T. S. Mendonça, E. S. Silva, M. Pereira, P. R. Obreli-Neto, V. S. Belo, G. C. Ferreira, Paula Resende Daher Chaves, S. Leite, A. Baldoni
{"title":"Patients in insulin analogues use via judicial litigation: do they use the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS)?","authors":"T. S. Mendonça, E. S. Silva, M. Pereira, P. R. Obreli-Neto, V. S. Belo, G. C. Ferreira, Paula Resende Daher Chaves, S. Leite, A. Baldoni","doi":"10.1590/1414-462x202331020102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Studies show that among the drugs most commonly used in judicial litigation in Brazil, are those used to treat diabetes mellitus, especially insulin analogues. Objective Evaluate the use of the Unified Health System (SUS) by patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), who receive insulin analogues through judicial action, before and after this process. Method In a retrospective longitudinal observational study, secondary data was used from these patients in Minas Gerais, Brazil, in 2018. Socio-demographic information was collected and related to the follow-up of these patients in the SUS. The McNemar χ2 test was used to compare the proportions of the variables. Results Of the 89 patients analyzed, women (53.9%) were predominant. Most patients were aged between 20 and 39 years (52.8%), and more than half, 55.1%, use only a private health system. After the judicial action, there was a significant increase (p <0.05) in the number of patients who had consultations in primary health care (from 19.1% to 30.3%) and emergency medical appointments (from 1.1% to 9.0%). Conclusion It is observed that the majority of patients with T1DM via judicial action in the SUS are not monitored by this health system through examinations, consultations, and hospitalizations.","PeriodicalId":31264,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de Saude Coletiva","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de Saude Coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462x202331020102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background Studies show that among the drugs most commonly used in judicial litigation in Brazil, are those used to treat diabetes mellitus, especially insulin analogues. Objective Evaluate the use of the Unified Health System (SUS) by patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), who receive insulin analogues through judicial action, before and after this process. Method In a retrospective longitudinal observational study, secondary data was used from these patients in Minas Gerais, Brazil, in 2018. Socio-demographic information was collected and related to the follow-up of these patients in the SUS. The McNemar χ2 test was used to compare the proportions of the variables. Results Of the 89 patients analyzed, women (53.9%) were predominant. Most patients were aged between 20 and 39 years (52.8%), and more than half, 55.1%, use only a private health system. After the judicial action, there was a significant increase (p <0.05) in the number of patients who had consultations in primary health care (from 19.1% to 30.3%) and emergency medical appointments (from 1.1% to 9.0%). Conclusion It is observed that the majority of patients with T1DM via judicial action in the SUS are not monitored by this health system through examinations, consultations, and hospitalizations.
通过司法诉讼使用胰岛素类似物的患者:他们是否使用巴西公共卫生系统(SUS)?
背景研究表明,巴西司法诉讼中最常使用的药物是用于治疗糖尿病的药物,尤其是胰岛素类似物。目的评价1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者通过司法程序接受胰岛素类似物治疗前后对统一卫生系统(SUS)的使用情况。方法在一项回顾性纵向观察研究中,使用了2018年巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州这些患者的辅助数据。收集社会人口学信息,并在SUS中对这些患者进行随访。采用McNemar χ2检验比较各变量的比例。结果89例患者中,女性占53.9%。大多数患者年龄在20至39岁之间(52.8%),超过一半(55.1%)仅使用私人卫生系统。司法行动后,在初级卫生保健机构就诊的患者人数(从19.1%增加到30.3%)和急诊就诊的患者人数(从1.1%增加到9.0%)显著增加(p <0.05)。结论:在SUS司法诉讼中,大多数T1DM患者没有通过检查、咨询和住院接受该卫生系统的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信