Usefulness of Tracing Reports Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Outpatient Cancer Chemotherapy

Yoshiki Arita, Yuuki Hanai, Arisu Miyagawa, H. Sugai, S. Miyata, Sachiko Yanagino, Yohei Ishikawa, Kazumi Watanabe, Maki Sakamoto, Takahiro Matsumoto, K. Nishizawa
{"title":"Usefulness of Tracing Reports Based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Outpatient Cancer Chemotherapy","authors":"Yoshiki Arita, Yuuki Hanai, Arisu Miyagawa, H. Sugai, S. Miyata, Sachiko Yanagino, Yohei Ishikawa, Kazumi Watanabe, Maki Sakamoto, Takahiro Matsumoto, K. Nishizawa","doi":"10.5649/jjphcs.47.649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have developed a new tool for sharing information of patients undergoing outpatient cancer chemotherapy with community pharmacists. We created the Tracing Report (TR) based on CTCAE which suggests high risk adverse events according to the chemotherapy. In this study, we observe the changes in the information obtained from community pharmacists and the utilization of the information by hospital pharmacists due to the change from the conventional free- form TR to the CTCAE-form TR. The subject is 164 tracing reports received from community pharmacists between September 2018 and August 2020 at Toho University Medical Center Omori Hospital. We retrospectively investigated the patient background, the percentage of statements about the occurrence of adverse events, and the rate of physician adoption of prescription suggestions from community pharmacists. We also sent a questionnaire to the community pharmacists to evaluate the usefulness of the CTCAE Form TR. Of the 164 tracing reports received, 40 were free-form TR and 124 were CTCAE-form TR. The results showed that the report rate of adverse drug reactions was significantly higher for the CTCAE Form TR in all categories. Hospital pharmacists aggregate information from tracing reports and suggest supportive care to physicians, and the number of physician adoptions was significantly higher in the CTCAE Form TR than in the Free Form TR. 95 % of the community pharmacists rated the CTCAE Form TR as being easier to use than the conventional free-form TR. Information sharing using the CTCAE Form TR can contribute to safe outpatient cancer chemotherapy.","PeriodicalId":14574,"journal":{"name":"Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5649/jjphcs.47.649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have developed a new tool for sharing information of patients undergoing outpatient cancer chemotherapy with community pharmacists. We created the Tracing Report (TR) based on CTCAE which suggests high risk adverse events according to the chemotherapy. In this study, we observe the changes in the information obtained from community pharmacists and the utilization of the information by hospital pharmacists due to the change from the conventional free- form TR to the CTCAE-form TR. The subject is 164 tracing reports received from community pharmacists between September 2018 and August 2020 at Toho University Medical Center Omori Hospital. We retrospectively investigated the patient background, the percentage of statements about the occurrence of adverse events, and the rate of physician adoption of prescription suggestions from community pharmacists. We also sent a questionnaire to the community pharmacists to evaluate the usefulness of the CTCAE Form TR. Of the 164 tracing reports received, 40 were free-form TR and 124 were CTCAE-form TR. The results showed that the report rate of adverse drug reactions was significantly higher for the CTCAE Form TR in all categories. Hospital pharmacists aggregate information from tracing reports and suggest supportive care to physicians, and the number of physician adoptions was significantly higher in the CTCAE Form TR than in the Free Form TR. 95 % of the community pharmacists rated the CTCAE Form TR as being easier to use than the conventional free-form TR. Information sharing using the CTCAE Form TR can contribute to safe outpatient cancer chemotherapy.
基于门诊癌症化疗不良事件通用术语标准的追踪报告的有效性
我们开发了一个新的工具,用于与社区药剂师共享门诊癌症化疗患者的信息。我们创建了基于CTCAE的追踪报告(TR),根据化疗提示高危不良事件。在本研究中,我们观察了从传统的自由表格TR到ctcae表格TR的变化,从社区药师获得的信息和医院药师利用信息的变化。研究对象是东宝大学医学中心大森医院2018年9月至2020年8月从社区药师收到的164份追踪报告。我们回顾性调查了患者的背景,不良事件发生的陈述百分比,以及医生采纳社区药剂师处方建议的比率。我们还对社区药师进行问卷调查,对CTCAE表格TR的有效性进行评估。在收到的164份追踪报告中,自由表格TR 40份,CTCAE表格TR 124份。结果表明,CTCAE表格TR在所有类别中药物不良反应的报告率均显著高于CTCAE表格TR。医院药剂师从追踪报告中收集信息,并向医生建议支持性治疗,采用CTCAE表格TR的医生数量明显高于自由表格TR。95%的社区药剂师认为CTCAE表格TR比传统的自由表格TR更容易使用。使用CTCAE表格TR的信息共享有助于安全的门诊癌症化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信