Miracle as a Message: Cosmological, Anthropological and Educational Implications

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
M. Kultaieva, L. M. Panchenko
{"title":"Miracle as a Message: Cosmological, Anthropological and Educational Implications","authors":"M. Kultaieva, L. M. Panchenko","doi":"10.15802/ampr.v0i22.271323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to explain in religious, secular, and post-secular contexts the functional potential of conceptualizing the miracle as a text or message with a motivational effect. Theoretical basis. Max Weber, Ernst Tugendhat, Alexander Geppert and Till Kössler analysed the processes of enchantment and disenchantment of the world on a philosophical basis. The representatives of the Frankfurt school (Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin) and their followers describe the cultural processes of post-secularism (Jürgen Habermas, Peter Sloterdijk) in detail. The logic of cultural and social representation of amazing events and their descriptions can be realized by combining hermeneutic analysis with a functionalist approach based on the model of Niklas Luhmann and the discursive ethics of Karl-Otto Apel. Originality. Desired cultural, social and political situations in society often arise unexpectedly and suddenly, which provokes to characterize them as a miracle. However, at the basis of the emergence of such situations are the rules of social communication, in particular those that provide for asymmetric communication with questions that await answers. A miracle appears at the moment of transformation of asymmetric communication into a symmetrical one: each specific miracle-phenomenon needs its own metaphorical understanding and interpretation as a message. Conclusions. The article proposes an analysis of miracle phenomenon in its cosmological, anthropological and educational implications. Some tendencies fixed by communicative turn of the contemporary philosophy are also contributed to considering the miracle in its objective and subjective representations. The semantics of the miracle is analysed according to the relevant problem fields. The functionality of miracle is examined on its ability to show orientation for the contemporary societies with their tendency to post-secularity. The fusion of Pre-modernity and Late Modernity is taking into account when the semantics of miracle is described accordingly to their communication functionality. The enchanting and disenchanting dialectic is explained on semantics of miracle as a world and cosmic events.","PeriodicalId":42650,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i22.271323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explain in religious, secular, and post-secular contexts the functional potential of conceptualizing the miracle as a text or message with a motivational effect. Theoretical basis. Max Weber, Ernst Tugendhat, Alexander Geppert and Till Kössler analysed the processes of enchantment and disenchantment of the world on a philosophical basis. The representatives of the Frankfurt school (Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin) and their followers describe the cultural processes of post-secularism (Jürgen Habermas, Peter Sloterdijk) in detail. The logic of cultural and social representation of amazing events and their descriptions can be realized by combining hermeneutic analysis with a functionalist approach based on the model of Niklas Luhmann and the discursive ethics of Karl-Otto Apel. Originality. Desired cultural, social and political situations in society often arise unexpectedly and suddenly, which provokes to characterize them as a miracle. However, at the basis of the emergence of such situations are the rules of social communication, in particular those that provide for asymmetric communication with questions that await answers. A miracle appears at the moment of transformation of asymmetric communication into a symmetrical one: each specific miracle-phenomenon needs its own metaphorical understanding and interpretation as a message. Conclusions. The article proposes an analysis of miracle phenomenon in its cosmological, anthropological and educational implications. Some tendencies fixed by communicative turn of the contemporary philosophy are also contributed to considering the miracle in its objective and subjective representations. The semantics of the miracle is analysed according to the relevant problem fields. The functionality of miracle is examined on its ability to show orientation for the contemporary societies with their tendency to post-secularity. The fusion of Pre-modernity and Late Modernity is taking into account when the semantics of miracle is described accordingly to their communication functionality. The enchanting and disenchanting dialectic is explained on semantics of miracle as a world and cosmic events.
奇迹作为一种信息:宇宙学、人类学和教育意义
本文的目的是解释在宗教、世俗和后世俗背景下,将奇迹概念化为具有激励作用的文本或信息的功能潜力。理论基础。马克斯·韦伯、恩斯特·图根哈特、亚历山大·格佩尔和蒂尔Kössler在哲学基础上分析了世界的迷人和祛魅过程。法兰克福学派的代表人物(西奥多·阿多诺、马克斯·霍克海默、瓦尔特·本雅明)及其追随者详细描述了后世俗主义的文化过程(约翰·根·哈贝马斯、彼得·斯洛特戴克)。通过将解释学分析与基于卢曼模型和阿佩尔话语伦理学的功能主义方法相结合,可以实现惊人事件及其描述的文化和社会表征逻辑。创意。社会中人们所期望的文化、社会和政治状况往往出乎意料地突然出现,这使人们把它们描述为奇迹。然而,这种情况出现的基础是社会沟通的规则,特别是那些提供不对称沟通的问题等待答案的规则。在非对称传播向对称传播转化的瞬间,奇迹就出现了:每一个具体的奇迹现象都需要作为一种信息的隐喻性理解和诠释。结论。本文从宇宙学、人类学和教育学三个方面对奇迹现象进行了分析。当代哲学的交际转向所决定的一些倾向,也促成了对奇迹的客观表征和主观表征的思考。根据相关的问题领域对奇迹的语义进行了分析。奇迹的功能是考察其为当代社会的后世俗倾向显示方向的能力。根据奇迹的传播功能对其语义进行描述,是考虑到前现代性与后现代性的融合。从奇迹作为世界和宇宙事件的语义学角度解释了妖娆与祛魅的辩证法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信