Reliability-Based Self-Imposed Pressure Restriction / Derate Pressure Estimation for Corrosion and Crack

Jason Yan, Shenwei Zhang, Joe Saunders, C. Blackwell
{"title":"Reliability-Based Self-Imposed Pressure Restriction / Derate Pressure Estimation for Corrosion and Crack","authors":"Jason Yan, Shenwei Zhang, Joe Saunders, C. Blackwell","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Corrosion and crack anomalies are the major threats to the safety and structural integrity of oil and gas transmission pipelines. Pipeline operators commonly manage the corrosion and crack threats by regular in-line inspection.\n After inspection, operators need to identify critical anomalies and plan mitigation works. Traditionally, a deterministic approach is used to assess anomalies using characteristic values of pipe properties, anomaly size, growth rate, and considering a minimum required safety factor (e.g., 1.25). TC Energy has used a full reliability-based method to determine the mitigation plan for corrosion and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) anomalies considering all the uncertainties associated with pipe geometry, material properties, anomaly size, growth rate and assessment model error explicitly. This method enables TC Energy to maintain the annual probability of failure of all known anomalies with the same location class not exceeding a consistent threshold (e.g., 1E−3 per anomaly per year).\n Anomalies that do not meet the minimum safety margin (e.g., deterministic safety factor or reliability-based threshold) and cannot be mitigated timely, are usually managed by applying short-term self-imposed pressure restriction (derate). Derate pressure is typically calculated deterministically with conservative anomaly size, growth rate and a global safety factor. To account for potential parameter variation, conservative inputs often lead to conservative derate pressure. There is inconsistency between a full reliability-based mitigation plan and a deterministic short-term derate plan.\n This study introduces a new efficient reliability-based approach using a Monte Carlo simulation technique to determine the derate schedule (e.g., the minimum required derate pressure for each month) to maintain the system to a consistent safety level. Two case studies, one MFL and one EMAT inspection with reported critical corrosion and crack anomalies, are conducted to demonstrate the advantage of fully reliability-based derate approach. The optimized derate plan minimizes the economical business impact to operators. The proposed framework in this study can be widely used to improve derate programs.","PeriodicalId":21327,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corrosion and crack anomalies are the major threats to the safety and structural integrity of oil and gas transmission pipelines. Pipeline operators commonly manage the corrosion and crack threats by regular in-line inspection. After inspection, operators need to identify critical anomalies and plan mitigation works. Traditionally, a deterministic approach is used to assess anomalies using characteristic values of pipe properties, anomaly size, growth rate, and considering a minimum required safety factor (e.g., 1.25). TC Energy has used a full reliability-based method to determine the mitigation plan for corrosion and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) anomalies considering all the uncertainties associated with pipe geometry, material properties, anomaly size, growth rate and assessment model error explicitly. This method enables TC Energy to maintain the annual probability of failure of all known anomalies with the same location class not exceeding a consistent threshold (e.g., 1E−3 per anomaly per year). Anomalies that do not meet the minimum safety margin (e.g., deterministic safety factor or reliability-based threshold) and cannot be mitigated timely, are usually managed by applying short-term self-imposed pressure restriction (derate). Derate pressure is typically calculated deterministically with conservative anomaly size, growth rate and a global safety factor. To account for potential parameter variation, conservative inputs often lead to conservative derate pressure. There is inconsistency between a full reliability-based mitigation plan and a deterministic short-term derate plan. This study introduces a new efficient reliability-based approach using a Monte Carlo simulation technique to determine the derate schedule (e.g., the minimum required derate pressure for each month) to maintain the system to a consistent safety level. Two case studies, one MFL and one EMAT inspection with reported critical corrosion and crack anomalies, are conducted to demonstrate the advantage of fully reliability-based derate approach. The optimized derate plan minimizes the economical business impact to operators. The proposed framework in this study can be widely used to improve derate programs.
基于可靠性的腐蚀和裂纹自施加压力限制/降额压力估计
腐蚀和裂纹异常是威胁油气输送管道安全和结构完整性的主要问题。管道运营商通常通过定期在线检查来管理腐蚀和裂纹威胁。检查后,作业者需要识别关键异常并计划缓解工作。传统上,使用确定性方法来评估异常,使用管道特性、异常尺寸、生长速率的特征值,并考虑最小要求的安全系数(例如1.25)。TC Energy采用了一种完全基于可靠性的方法来确定腐蚀和应力腐蚀开裂(SCC)异常的缓解计划,该方法考虑了与管道几何形状、材料特性、异常尺寸、生长速度和评估模型误差相关的所有不确定性。该方法使TC Energy能够保持相同位置类别的所有已知异常的年故障概率不超过一致的阈值(例如,每年每个异常1E - 3)。不满足最小安全范围(例如,确定性安全系数或基于可靠性的阈值)且不能及时缓解的异常,通常通过施加短期自我施加的压力限制(降额)来管理。降额压力通常是用保守的异常尺寸、增长率和全局安全系数来确定计算的。为了考虑潜在的参数变化,保守的输入通常导致保守的降额压力。完全基于可靠性的缓解计划与确定性短期降额计划之间存在不一致。本研究引入了一种新的基于可靠性的高效方法,使用蒙特卡罗模拟技术来确定降额计划(例如,每个月所需的最小降额压力),以将系统维持在一致的安全水平。两个案例研究,一个是MFL检查,一个是EMAT检查,报告了临界腐蚀和裂纹异常,以证明完全基于可靠性的降率方法的优势。优化后的流量计划最大限度地减少了对作业者的经济影响。本研究所提出的框架可广泛用于改善降额计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信