“Collective Editorial” for South African Review of Sociology 51(3&4): Special Issue on Homelessness and COVID-19

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
{"title":"“Collective Editorial” for South African Review of Sociology 51(3&4): Special Issue on Homelessness and COVID-19","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/21528586.2022.2039483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More central to re ection is the way the article demonstrates the role and place of applied social sciences and methodologies in responding to human crisis in late modern societies. , and give an overview of a joint project by the University of Johannesburg and the Human Council (HSRC) with an aptly titled article, “ Giving ‘ voice ’ during the COVID-19 pandemic using online rapid response surveys: Lessons from the UJ/HSRC COVID-19 Democracy Survey ” . The authors re fl ect on the use of rapid response non-probabilistic surveys using a mass membership online data-free platform. Overall, the article provides insights into best practices in online survey research within the context of South Africa, where the digital divide is exceedingly present. The main argument is that online surveys make it feasible to reach the broader public, especially when dealing with time-sensitive issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and the authors re fl ect on the bene fi ts and limitations of using this type of data collection method. Drawing on the data that were collected through the COVID-19 Democracy Survey, the article looks into the public ’ s responses to the pandemic. In par-ticular, the public ’ s views on various government pandemic policy decisions, their views on school closures and the reopening of schools during 2020, as well as the extent to which individuals are experiencing pandemic fatigue are all reported on and analysed in this fascinating article. These contributions in this special edition seek to explore the various ways in which the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the lives of ordinary South Africans. At the same time, it also provides sociological insights into how we can make sense of the impact that the pandemic has on the ground and how we can respond to it as social researchers.","PeriodicalId":44730,"journal":{"name":"South African Review of Sociology","volume":"39 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2022.2039483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More central to re ection is the way the article demonstrates the role and place of applied social sciences and methodologies in responding to human crisis in late modern societies. , and give an overview of a joint project by the University of Johannesburg and the Human Council (HSRC) with an aptly titled article, “ Giving ‘ voice ’ during the COVID-19 pandemic using online rapid response surveys: Lessons from the UJ/HSRC COVID-19 Democracy Survey ” . The authors re fl ect on the use of rapid response non-probabilistic surveys using a mass membership online data-free platform. Overall, the article provides insights into best practices in online survey research within the context of South Africa, where the digital divide is exceedingly present. The main argument is that online surveys make it feasible to reach the broader public, especially when dealing with time-sensitive issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and the authors re fl ect on the bene fi ts and limitations of using this type of data collection method. Drawing on the data that were collected through the COVID-19 Democracy Survey, the article looks into the public ’ s responses to the pandemic. In par-ticular, the public ’ s views on various government pandemic policy decisions, their views on school closures and the reopening of schools during 2020, as well as the extent to which individuals are experiencing pandemic fatigue are all reported on and analysed in this fascinating article. These contributions in this special edition seek to explore the various ways in which the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the lives of ordinary South Africans. At the same time, it also provides sociological insights into how we can make sense of the impact that the pandemic has on the ground and how we can respond to it as social researchers.
《南非社会学评论》第51期(3&4期)“集体社论”:无家可归与COVID-19特刊
更核心的反思是文章展示的作用和地位的应用社会科学和方法在应对人类危机的晚期现代社会。,并概述了约翰内斯堡大学和人类理事会(HSRC)的一个联合项目,并撰写了一篇题为《利用在线快速反应调查在COVID-19大流行期间发出‘声音’:UJ/HSRC COVID-19民主调查的经验教训》的文章。作者反思了使用大规模会员在线无数据平台的快速反应非概率调查。总的来说,这篇文章提供了对南非背景下在线调查研究的最佳实践的见解,在那里数字鸿沟是非常存在的。主要论点是,在线调查可以接触到更广泛的公众,特别是在处理COVID-19大流行等时间敏感问题时,作者反思了使用这种类型的数据收集方法的好处和局限性。根据2019冠状病毒病民主调查收集的数据,本文研究了公众对大流行的反应。特别是,公众对政府各种流行病政策决定的看法,他们对2020年期间学校关闭和重新开放的看法,以及个人经历流行病疲劳的程度,都在这篇引人入胜的文章中得到了报道和分析。本期特别版的这些文章旨在探讨2019冠状病毒病大流行改变普通南非人生活的各种方式。与此同时,它还为我们如何理解大流行对实地的影响以及我们作为社会研究人员如何应对它提供了社会学见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信