Intellectual property: theorizing and empirical analysis

V. Nikolayevskyy, V. Omelchenko, O. Bakalenko
{"title":"Intellectual property: theorizing and empirical analysis","authors":"V. Nikolayevskyy, V. Omelchenko, O. Bakalenko","doi":"10.26565/2077-5105-2020-24-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of the article based on the understanding of intellectual property as an immanent component of the innovative economy, an important factor, resource and mechanism of innovation environment and development, note the actualization of this phenomenon in nowadays society of revolutionary technological changes. The article deals with the brief overview of the some features and characteristics of the process of reforming the institute of intellectual property in Ukraine, including regulatory framework, and also is based on the analysis of data gathered in sociological survey «Intellectual property through the eyes of university lecturers and high school teachers», conducted during May-December 2019, method – interview; n = 356. Based on the research results, the authors analyze high school teachers’ and university lecturers’ attitudes to the intellectual property, the factors and mechanisms of protection of intellectual property rights. What are the attitudes towards violation of intellectual property rights in the field of education? How acute is the problem of intellectual property rights (IPR) violation for the participants in the educational process? Is the impact of intellectual property rights violation noticeable on their (high school teachers and university lecturers) day-to-day activities? Who, what institution (organization) should make efforts to protect IPR? These and some other issues are analyzed in the paper. The authors note, among other, that, in general, the problem of IPR violations perceived as quite acute for many (relative majority) of university lecturers and high school teachers, the impact of this problem on respondents’ daily activities is mostly negative. Opinions of respondents on the institution(s), which should make efforts to protect IPR were clarified. Analysis of possible ways (inner and external factors, mechanisms) to enhance the level of protection, public management of the protection process, as well as the development of a culture of IPR is presented also. The authors propose the prospects for further research of the problem.","PeriodicalId":62895,"journal":{"name":"科学24小时","volume":"187 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"科学24小时","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2077-5105-2020-24-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors of the article based on the understanding of intellectual property as an immanent component of the innovative economy, an important factor, resource and mechanism of innovation environment and development, note the actualization of this phenomenon in nowadays society of revolutionary technological changes. The article deals with the brief overview of the some features and characteristics of the process of reforming the institute of intellectual property in Ukraine, including regulatory framework, and also is based on the analysis of data gathered in sociological survey «Intellectual property through the eyes of university lecturers and high school teachers», conducted during May-December 2019, method – interview; n = 356. Based on the research results, the authors analyze high school teachers’ and university lecturers’ attitudes to the intellectual property, the factors and mechanisms of protection of intellectual property rights. What are the attitudes towards violation of intellectual property rights in the field of education? How acute is the problem of intellectual property rights (IPR) violation for the participants in the educational process? Is the impact of intellectual property rights violation noticeable on their (high school teachers and university lecturers) day-to-day activities? Who, what institution (organization) should make efforts to protect IPR? These and some other issues are analyzed in the paper. The authors note, among other, that, in general, the problem of IPR violations perceived as quite acute for many (relative majority) of university lecturers and high school teachers, the impact of this problem on respondents’ daily activities is mostly negative. Opinions of respondents on the institution(s), which should make efforts to protect IPR were clarified. Analysis of possible ways (inner and external factors, mechanisms) to enhance the level of protection, public management of the protection process, as well as the development of a culture of IPR is presented also. The authors propose the prospects for further research of the problem.
知识产权:理论与实证分析
知识产权是创新经济的内在组成部分,是创新环境和发展的重要因素、资源和机制,这一现象在当今社会的革命性技术变革中得以实现。本文简要概述了乌克兰知识产权研究所改革过程的一些特征和特点,包括监管框架,并基于对社会学调查“大学讲师和高中教师眼中的知识产权”收集的数据的分析,该调查于2019年5月至12月进行,方法-访谈;N = 356。基于研究结果,作者分析了高中教师和大学讲师对知识产权的态度、知识产权保护的因素和机制。对教育领域侵犯知识产权的态度如何?对于教育过程中的参与者来说,知识产权侵犯问题有多严重?侵犯知识产权对他们(高中教师和大学讲师)日常活动的影响是否明显?谁、什么机构(组织)应该努力保护知识产权?本文对这些问题以及其他一些问题进行了分析。作者指出,总体而言,许多(相对多数)大学讲师和高中教师认为侵犯知识产权的问题相当严重,但这一问题对受访者日常活动的影响大多是负面的。受访者对哪些机构应该努力保护知识产权的意见得到了澄清。本文还分析了提高知识产权保护水平的可能途径(内外部因素、机制)、保护过程的公共管理以及知识产权文化的发展。作者对该问题的进一步研究提出了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6690
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信