A Comparison of Electronic Infrastructures in the Air Cargo Industry in the Netherlands and Hong Kong SAR

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
E. Christiaanse, J. Damsgaard
{"title":"A Comparison of Electronic Infrastructures in the Air Cargo Industry in the Netherlands and Hong Kong SAR","authors":"E. Christiaanse, J. Damsgaard","doi":"10.4018/jgim.2001040102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reasons behind the failure and success of large-scale information systems projects continue to intrigue researchers. In particular in the airline industry very successful (passenger reservation) systems have been built which have totally changed the competitive arena of the industry. On the cargo side however attempts to implement large-scale community systems have largely failed across the globe. Air cargo parties are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of IT and, increasingly, they understand the value that IOS could provide for the total value chain performance. However, whereas in other sectors IOSs have been very successful, there are only fragmented examples of successful global systems in the air cargo community and the penetration of IOS in the air cargo industry is by no means pervasive. This paper describes the genesis and evolution of two IOSs in the air cargo community and identifies plausible explanations that lead one to be a success and one to be a failure. It draws on extensive fieldwork in Europe and in Hong Kong SAR that is complemented by secondary data analysis of relevant trade and company literature. We argue that in these two cases the complex, institutional and technical choices by the initiators of the system in terms of their competitive implications that were the main causes for the systems failure. The paper thus concludes that it was the institutional factors involved in the relationships of the stakeholders that led to the opposite manifestations of the two initiatives, and that such factors should be taken into account when designing and implementing large-scale information systems.","PeriodicalId":46306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Information Management","volume":"5 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2001040102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Reasons behind the failure and success of large-scale information systems projects continue to intrigue researchers. In particular in the airline industry very successful (passenger reservation) systems have been built which have totally changed the competitive arena of the industry. On the cargo side however attempts to implement large-scale community systems have largely failed across the globe. Air cargo parties are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of IT and, increasingly, they understand the value that IOS could provide for the total value chain performance. However, whereas in other sectors IOSs have been very successful, there are only fragmented examples of successful global systems in the air cargo community and the penetration of IOS in the air cargo industry is by no means pervasive. This paper describes the genesis and evolution of two IOSs in the air cargo community and identifies plausible explanations that lead one to be a success and one to be a failure. It draws on extensive fieldwork in Europe and in Hong Kong SAR that is complemented by secondary data analysis of relevant trade and company literature. We argue that in these two cases the complex, institutional and technical choices by the initiators of the system in terms of their competitive implications that were the main causes for the systems failure. The paper thus concludes that it was the institutional factors involved in the relationships of the stakeholders that led to the opposite manifestations of the two initiatives, and that such factors should be taken into account when designing and implementing large-scale information systems.
荷兰与香港特别行政区航空货运业电子基础设施比较
大型信息系统项目成败背后的原因一直让研究人员感兴趣。特别是在航空业,已经建立了非常成功的(乘客预订)系统,这完全改变了该行业的竞争舞台。然而,在货运方面,全球范围内实施大规模社区系统的尝试基本上失败了。航空货运各方越来越意识到IT的重要性,并且越来越了解IOS可以为整个价值链绩效提供的价值。然而,尽管在其他领域,系统管理系统非常成功,但在航空货运界,成功的全球系统只有零散的例子,而且系统管理系统在航空货运业的渗透绝不是普遍的。本文描述了航空货运界两种iiss的起源和演变,并确定了导致其中一种成功而另一种失败的合理解释。它借鉴了在欧洲和香港特别行政区广泛的实地考察,并辅以相关贸易和公司文献的二手数据分析。我们认为,在这两种情况下,系统发起者在竞争影响方面的复杂的制度和技术选择是系统失败的主要原因。因此,本文得出的结论是,利益相关者关系中涉及的制度因素导致了这两个倡议的相反表现,在设计和实施大型信息系统时应考虑到这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Information Management
Journal of Global Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that are consistent to the following submission themes: (a) Cross-National Studies. These need not be cross-culture per se. These studies lead to understanding of IT as it leaves one nation and is built/bought/used in another. Generally, these studies bring to light transferability issues and they challenge if practices in one nation transfer. (b) Cross-Cultural Studies. These need not be cross-nation. Cultures could be across regions that share a similar culture. They can also be within nations. These studies lead to understanding of IT as it leaves one culture and is built/bought/used in another. Generally, these studies bring to light transferability issues and they challenge if practices in one culture transfer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信