Use of rituximab in pediatric nephrology practice

Ye.K. Lagodych
{"title":"Use of rituximab in pediatric nephrology practice","authors":"Ye.K. Lagodych","doi":"10.22141/2307-1257.12.1.2023.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Materials and methods. The article presents the data on the analysis of case histories in 16 children with glomerulopathies who received treatment with rituximab in accordance with the diagnoses. Age of patients was 5 to 18 years, distribution by sex — 5 boys (31.3 %), 11 girls (68.8 %). Twelve children (75 %) received rituximab for frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS) and 4 (25 %) children for lupus nephritis. Results. In some cases, rituximab was prescribed against the background of glucocorticoids per os. Rituximab therapy followed a protocol with pre-administration of 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone or 100 mg hydrocortisone, followed by 15 mg/kg rituximab at a rate of approximately 50 ml/h using an infusion pump, which had previously been diluted with saline 1 mg/ml, with constant monitoring of the child’s condition. Rituximab was administered at least twice, two weeks apart. If necessary, after monitoring the level of CD20 in the blood serum, and in the presence of any number of cells or the preservation of the activity of the process, rituximab was administered again 6 months after the last injection. During treatment with rituximab, children who received glucocorticoids per os did not receive them, and the next day after the infusion they continued to receive them at the same dose. Nine children received concomitant therapy per os with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor at a renoprotective dose, which was not canceled on the days of ritu­ximab infusion. During the administration of rituximab, two children reported adverse reactions in the form of a decreased blood pressure and tachycardia, which most likely occurred against the background of an increased rate of administration, and after stopping the infusion and a subsequent decrease in its rate, they disappeared. All other children tolerated rituximab well. The effectiveness of rituximab therapy was evaluated by the level of proteinuria, which at the baseline averaged 4.0 g/l, and after rituximab infusion, it averaged 0.5 g/l. Conclusions. Today, in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine and limited resources, the use of rituximab opens new opportunities in the treatment of nephrological pathology in children, acting as an alternative to the long-term use of glucocorticoids, simplifying treatment and reducing the number of side effects, especially in children with FRNS/SDNS and pathology-mediated AT (lupus nephritis). However, it is important to adhere to the protocol for rituximab administration and especially the rate of administration due to frequent adverse infusion reactions.","PeriodicalId":17874,"journal":{"name":"KIDNEYS","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KIDNEYS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22141/2307-1257.12.1.2023.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Materials and methods. The article presents the data on the analysis of case histories in 16 children with glomerulopathies who received treatment with rituximab in accordance with the diagnoses. Age of patients was 5 to 18 years, distribution by sex — 5 boys (31.3 %), 11 girls (68.8 %). Twelve children (75 %) received rituximab for frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FRNS/SDNS) and 4 (25 %) children for lupus nephritis. Results. In some cases, rituximab was prescribed against the background of glucocorticoids per os. Rituximab therapy followed a protocol with pre-administration of 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone or 100 mg hydrocortisone, followed by 15 mg/kg rituximab at a rate of approximately 50 ml/h using an infusion pump, which had previously been diluted with saline 1 mg/ml, with constant monitoring of the child’s condition. Rituximab was administered at least twice, two weeks apart. If necessary, after monitoring the level of CD20 in the blood serum, and in the presence of any number of cells or the preservation of the activity of the process, rituximab was administered again 6 months after the last injection. During treatment with rituximab, children who received glucocorticoids per os did not receive them, and the next day after the infusion they continued to receive them at the same dose. Nine children received concomitant therapy per os with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor at a renoprotective dose, which was not canceled on the days of ritu­ximab infusion. During the administration of rituximab, two children reported adverse reactions in the form of a decreased blood pressure and tachycardia, which most likely occurred against the background of an increased rate of administration, and after stopping the infusion and a subsequent decrease in its rate, they disappeared. All other children tolerated rituximab well. The effectiveness of rituximab therapy was evaluated by the level of proteinuria, which at the baseline averaged 4.0 g/l, and after rituximab infusion, it averaged 0.5 g/l. Conclusions. Today, in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine and limited resources, the use of rituximab opens new opportunities in the treatment of nephrological pathology in children, acting as an alternative to the long-term use of glucocorticoids, simplifying treatment and reducing the number of side effects, especially in children with FRNS/SDNS and pathology-mediated AT (lupus nephritis). However, it is important to adhere to the protocol for rituximab administration and especially the rate of administration due to frequent adverse infusion reactions.
利妥昔单抗在小儿肾脏病实践中的应用
材料和方法。本文介绍了16例肾小球疾病患儿根据诊断接受利妥昔单抗治疗的病例分析数据。患者年龄5 ~ 18岁,按性别分布:男孩5例(31.3%),女孩11例(68.8%)。12名儿童(75%)接受利妥昔单抗治疗频繁复发/类固醇依赖性肾病综合征(FRNS/SDNS), 4名儿童(25%)接受狼疮肾炎。结果。在某些情况下,利妥昔单抗是在糖皮质激素的背景下开出的。利妥昔单抗治疗遵循的方案是,预先给药1mg /kg甲基强的松或100mg氢化可的松,然后使用输注泵以约50ml /h的速率给药15mg /kg利妥昔单抗,之前用1mg /ml生理盐水稀释,并持续监测儿童的病情。利妥昔单抗至少两次,间隔两周。如有必要,在监测血清中CD20水平后,在存在任意数量的细胞或保存过程活性的情况下,在最后一次注射后6个月再次给予利妥昔单抗。在利妥昔单抗治疗期间,每天接受糖皮质激素治疗的儿童没有接受糖皮质激素治疗,在输注后的第二天,他们继续接受相同剂量的糖皮质激素治疗。9名儿童接受了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的联合治疗,其剂量为肾保护剂量,在输注美罗华的日子里没有取消。在给予利妥昔单抗期间,两名儿童报告了以血压下降和心动过速形式出现的不良反应,这很可能是在给药速率增加的背景下发生的,在停止输注并随后降低其速率后,这些不良反应消失了。所有其他儿童对利妥昔单抗耐受良好。通过蛋白尿水平来评估利妥昔单抗治疗的有效性,基线时平均为4.0 g/l,输注利妥昔单抗后平均为0.5 g/l。结论。今天,在乌克兰的戒严令和有限的资源条件下,利妥昔单抗的使用为治疗儿童肾病病理学开辟了新的机会,作为长期使用糖皮质激素的替代方案,简化了治疗并减少了副作用,特别是在患有FRNS/SDNS和病理介导的AT(狼疮性肾炎)的儿童中。然而,重要的是要遵守利妥昔单抗的给药方案,特别是由于输液不良反应频繁,给药速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信