4CPS-354 Efficacy and safety with erenumab and galcanezumab: our experience

A. Soler, M. A. Fullana, V. Collado, N. Ramos, A. Ruiz, F. P. Rossello, MM Crespi Magro, G. Ruiz, F. Alomar, M. Riera, V. Llodrá Ortolá
{"title":"4CPS-354 Efficacy and safety with erenumab and galcanezumab: our experience","authors":"A. Soler, M. A. Fullana, V. Collado, N. Ramos, A. Ruiz, F. P. Rossello, MM Crespi Magro, G. Ruiz, F. Alomar, M. Riera, V. Llodrá Ortolá","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) receptor inhibitors are a new group of drugs that have been included for migraine pharmacotherapy and migraine prevention. Erenumab and galcanezumab have notable individual variance and we wanted to explore this effect and also their safety. Aim and objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of the CGRP receptor inhibitors erenumab and galcanezumab. Material and methods In this 6 month observational retrospective study (January to June 2020), based on patient interviews, we obtained demographic parameters, reduced monthly migraine days (RDMM), a response rate of 50% (TR50) and adverse effects during treatment. RDMM are calculated by subtracting the migraine days 4 weeks before starting the treatment from the monthly migraine days between weeks 9 and 12 of treatment. TR50 are patients who achieved at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days in comparison with their initial condition. Results 31 patients were registered with a mean age of 43.9 years (±12.1), 77.4% were women and 22.6% were men. 66.7% (n=22) of patients were treated with erenumab and 33.3% (n=9) with galcanezumab. The RDMM for erenumab was −10.5 days (−17.1; −3.9) and a TR50 of 81.8% (n=18). For galcanezumab, the RDMM was −5.5 days (−8.6; −0.8) and a TR50 of 33.3% (n=3). The most frequent adverse reactions to erenumab were constipation (31.8% (7)) and erythema at the injection site (9.1% (2)); for galcanezumab, it was erythema at the injection site (22.2% (2)). Conclusion and relevance Despite the disparity between the sample sizes of both drugs, in our study erenumab showed greater reduction in migraine days in comparison with patients treated with galcanezumab. Both drugs were safe in all patients, showing mild adverse reactions that did not require intervention. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance Calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) receptor inhibitors are a new group of drugs that have been included for migraine pharmacotherapy and migraine prevention. Erenumab and galcanezumab have notable individual variance and we wanted to explore this effect and also their safety. Aim and objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of the CGRP receptor inhibitors erenumab and galcanezumab. Material and methods In this 6 month observational retrospective study (January to June 2020), based on patient interviews, we obtained demographic parameters, reduced monthly migraine days (RDMM), a response rate of 50% (TR50) and adverse effects during treatment. RDMM are calculated by subtracting the migraine days 4 weeks before starting the treatment from the monthly migraine days between weeks 9 and 12 of treatment. TR50 are patients who achieved at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days in comparison with their initial condition. Results 31 patients were registered with a mean age of 43.9 years (±12.1), 77.4% were women and 22.6% were men. 66.7% (n=22) of patients were treated with erenumab and 33.3% (n=9) with galcanezumab. The RDMM for erenumab was −10.5 days (−17.1; −3.9) and a TR50 of 81.8% (n=18). For galcanezumab, the RDMM was −5.5 days (−8.6; −0.8) and a TR50 of 33.3% (n=3). The most frequent adverse reactions to erenumab were constipation (31.8% (7)) and erythema at the injection site (9.1% (2)); for galcanezumab, it was erythema at the injection site (22.2% (2)). Conclusion and relevance Despite the disparity between the sample sizes of both drugs, in our study erenumab showed greater reduction in migraine days in comparison with patients treated with galcanezumab. Both drugs were safe in all patients, showing mild adverse reactions that did not require intervention. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
erenumab和galcanezumab的疗效和安全性:我们的经验
降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)受体抑制剂是一类新的药物,已被纳入偏头痛药物治疗和偏头痛预防。Erenumab和galcanezumab有显著的个体差异,我们想探索这种影响及其安全性。目的评价CGRP受体抑制剂erenumab和galcanezumab的有效性和安全性。材料和方法在这项为期6个月的观察性回顾性研究(2020年1月至6月)中,基于患者访谈,我们获得了人口学参数,减少了每月偏头痛天数(RDMM),缓解率为50% (TR50)和治疗期间的不良反应。RDMM是通过从治疗第9周和第12周之间的每月偏头痛天数减去开始治疗前4周的偏头痛天数来计算的。TR50是指与初始状态相比,每月偏头痛天数至少减少50%的患者。结果31例患者平均年龄43.9岁(±12.1岁),其中女性77.4%,男性22.6%。66.7% (n=22)的患者接受erenumab治疗,33.3% (n=9)的患者接受galcanezumab治疗。erenumab的RDMM为−10.5天(−17.1天;−3.9),TR50为81.8% (n=18)。galcanezumab的RDMM为- 5.5天(- 8.6天;−0.8),TR50为33.3% (n=3)。最常见的不良反应是便秘(31.8%(7))和注射部位红斑(9.1% (2));对于galcanezumab,在注射部位出现红斑(22.2%)。结论和相关性尽管两种药物的样本量存在差异,但在我们的研究中,erenumab显示与galcanezumab治疗的患者相比,偏头痛天数减少更多。两种药物在所有患者中都是安全的,表现出轻微的不良反应,不需要干预。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信