Shelley’s Excursion

IF 0.2 3区文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities

STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900 Pub Date : 2021-07-22 DOI:10.1353/SEL.2020.0029

M. Callaghan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article considers Percy Bysshe Shelley’s response to William Wordsworth’s The Excursion, viewing the younger poet as responding to the challenge of Wordsworth’s epic throughout his career. Focusing specifically on Laon and Cythna, Prometheus Unbound, and The Triumph of Life, this article shows Shelley’s one-sided debate with Wordsworth as pitting his poetics against Wordsworth’s poetics, Shelleyan philosophy against Wordsworthian thought. The Excursion was not a poem for Shelley to reject. It was the epic that would tease Shelley into complex thought. Shelley’s troubled though profound response to Wordsworth’s poem sees Shelley make The Excursion his own.

查看原文本刊更多论文

雪莱的偏移

摘要:本文考察了雪莱对华兹华斯史诗《漫游》的回应，认为这位年轻的诗人一生都在回应华兹华斯史诗的挑战。本文以《拉翁与西特纳》、《未受束缚的普罗米修斯》和《生命的胜利》为重点，揭示了雪莱与华兹华斯的诗学之争、雪莱哲学与华兹华斯思想之争。《远足》是一首雪莱不能拒绝的诗。正是这部史诗使雪莱陷入了复杂的思考。雪莱对华兹华斯的诗做出了困惑而深刻的回应，这让雪莱把《远足》变成了自己的作品。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： SEL focuses on four fields of British literature in rotating, quarterly issues: English Renaissance, Tudor and Stuart Drama, Restoration and Eighteenth Century, and Nineteenth Century. The editors select learned, readable papers that contribute significantly to the understanding of British literature from 1500 to 1900. SEL is well known for thecommissioned omnibus review of recent studies in the field that is included in each issue. In a single volume, readers might find an argument for attributing a previously unknown work to Shakespeare or de-attributing a famous work from Milton, a study ofthe connections between class and genre in the Restoration Theater.