{"title":"J. K. Rowling and the Echo Chamber of Secrets","authors":"Gina Gwenffrewi","doi":"10.1215/23289252-9836176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This autoethnographic article attempts to capture the distress of a trans woman in Scotland at the transphobia in the legacy media's coverage of the J. K. Rowling furore in June 2020. Through the use of a frame narrative, the article analyses some of the transphobic elements of Rowling's essay published on June 10, 2020, originally titled “TERF Wars,” which prompted an online backlash and a subsequent cycle of negative legacy media coverage against trans people. The article deconstructs two opinion pieces in the Scotsman and the National that depict Rowling as a victim and trans women as abusive and/or delusional, with an accompanying association of trans women with virtual spaces, set against cis women inhabiting real-world spaces. The newspapers' subsequent, respective refusal to publish counter articles criticizing the opinion pieces is then described, with reference to the legacy media's more general cancel-culture narrative, described by Sara Ahmed as a “mechanism of power.” Concluding on the experience of having no personal voice or access to the kind of influence enjoyed by a transphobic legacy media, the article refers to Andrew Anastasia's conception of three modes of transgender voice to identify how only collective action can allow trans voices to be heard and effect change.","PeriodicalId":44767,"journal":{"name":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-9836176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This autoethnographic article attempts to capture the distress of a trans woman in Scotland at the transphobia in the legacy media's coverage of the J. K. Rowling furore in June 2020. Through the use of a frame narrative, the article analyses some of the transphobic elements of Rowling's essay published on June 10, 2020, originally titled “TERF Wars,” which prompted an online backlash and a subsequent cycle of negative legacy media coverage against trans people. The article deconstructs two opinion pieces in the Scotsman and the National that depict Rowling as a victim and trans women as abusive and/or delusional, with an accompanying association of trans women with virtual spaces, set against cis women inhabiting real-world spaces. The newspapers' subsequent, respective refusal to publish counter articles criticizing the opinion pieces is then described, with reference to the legacy media's more general cancel-culture narrative, described by Sara Ahmed as a “mechanism of power.” Concluding on the experience of having no personal voice or access to the kind of influence enjoyed by a transphobic legacy media, the article refers to Andrew Anastasia's conception of three modes of transgender voice to identify how only collective action can allow trans voices to be heard and effect change.
这篇自传体人种学文章试图捕捉苏格兰一名跨性别女性在传统媒体对2020年6月j·k·罗琳(J. K. Rowling)风波的报道中对跨性别者的恐惧。通过使用框架叙事,本文分析了罗琳于2020年6月10日发表的一篇文章中的一些跨性别因素,这篇文章最初的标题是“TERF战争”,这篇文章引发了网上的强烈反对,随后又引发了媒体对跨性别者的负面报道。这篇文章解构了《苏格兰人报》和《国家报》上的两篇评论文章,这两篇文章把罗琳描绘成受害者,把跨性别女性描绘成虐待者和/或妄想症患者,并将跨性别女性与虚拟空间联系起来,以反对居住在现实世界空间中的顺性别女性。随后,两家报纸各自拒绝发表批评这些观点的反驳文章,参照传统媒体更普遍的取消文化叙事,萨拉·艾哈迈德(Sara Ahmed)将其描述为一种“权力机制”。文章以没有个人声音或无法获得跨性别传统媒体所享有的那种影响的经历为总结,引用Andrew Anastasia关于跨性别声音的三种模式的概念,以确定如何只有集体行动才能让跨性别声音被听到并产生改变。