On contested shores: The evolving role of amphibious operations in the history of warfare

Evert Kleynhans
{"title":"On contested shores: The evolving role of amphibious operations in the history of warfare","authors":"Evert Kleynhans","doi":"10.5787/49-2-1342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of amphibious operations has seen a definite resurgence during recent years. The recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan forced militaries to shift their focus from traditional operations to those of counterinsurgency and counterterrorism. This shift in focus naturally affected the doctrine, organisation and employment of amphibious forces of Western militaries, such as the US Marine Corps and the British Royal Marines – who were both deployed in semi-conventional and counterinsurgency roles in Iraq and Afghanistan for extensive periods. However, after the end of these wars, both the US Marine Corps and the British Royal Marines had to go back to the proverbial drawing board and reassess their traditional roles as amphibious forces. Of interest, is the fact that in 2019, the Commandant of the US Marine Corps, General David H Berger, provided planning guidance in which he argued that the US Marines had to return to the sea, increase their naval integration, and expand their ability to fight not just from the sea but also in terms of sea control from the shore. 602 With this planning guidance, there was bound to be a drastic shift in the doctrine, organisation and employment of the US Marine Corps in general. While these developments were notable, they did not occur in a vacuum. Several militaries across the globe are currently reapplying their minds to amphibious operations and implementing drastic measures to remedy any potential shortfalls that exist in terms of doctrine, organisation and training. These changes are necessitated owing to the increasing likelihood of future amphibious operations due to an unprecedented population growth evidenced in coastal regions across the globe, the concomitant effects of climate change on existing waterways, rives and oceans, and growing political disputes in regions such as the South China Sea and the Arctic. During 2020, the Marine Corps University Press published an edited volume by Timothy Heck and Brett Friedman titled On contested shores: The evolving role of amphibious operations in the history of warfare . The book comprises 23 key chapters that trace the historical evolution of amphibious operations from the sixteenth century through to the present, and even looks toward the","PeriodicalId":53024,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Militaria","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Militaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5787/49-2-1342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of amphibious operations has seen a definite resurgence during recent years. The recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan forced militaries to shift their focus from traditional operations to those of counterinsurgency and counterterrorism. This shift in focus naturally affected the doctrine, organisation and employment of amphibious forces of Western militaries, such as the US Marine Corps and the British Royal Marines – who were both deployed in semi-conventional and counterinsurgency roles in Iraq and Afghanistan for extensive periods. However, after the end of these wars, both the US Marine Corps and the British Royal Marines had to go back to the proverbial drawing board and reassess their traditional roles as amphibious forces. Of interest, is the fact that in 2019, the Commandant of the US Marine Corps, General David H Berger, provided planning guidance in which he argued that the US Marines had to return to the sea, increase their naval integration, and expand their ability to fight not just from the sea but also in terms of sea control from the shore. 602 With this planning guidance, there was bound to be a drastic shift in the doctrine, organisation and employment of the US Marine Corps in general. While these developments were notable, they did not occur in a vacuum. Several militaries across the globe are currently reapplying their minds to amphibious operations and implementing drastic measures to remedy any potential shortfalls that exist in terms of doctrine, organisation and training. These changes are necessitated owing to the increasing likelihood of future amphibious operations due to an unprecedented population growth evidenced in coastal regions across the globe, the concomitant effects of climate change on existing waterways, rives and oceans, and growing political disputes in regions such as the South China Sea and the Arctic. During 2020, the Marine Corps University Press published an edited volume by Timothy Heck and Brett Friedman titled On contested shores: The evolving role of amphibious operations in the history of warfare . The book comprises 23 key chapters that trace the historical evolution of amphibious operations from the sixteenth century through to the present, and even looks toward the
在有争议的海岸:两栖作战在战争史上的演变作用
两栖作战的研究近年来明显复苏。最近在伊拉克和阿富汗的战争迫使军队将注意力从传统的行动转移到反叛乱和反恐行动上。这种重心的转移自然影响了西方军队两栖部队的理论、组织和使用,比如美国海军陆战队和英国皇家海军陆战队——他们在伊拉克和阿富汗都被部署在半常规和反叛乱的角色上很长时间。然而,在这些战争结束后,美国海军陆战队和英国皇家海军陆战队都不得不回到绘图板,重新评估他们作为两栖部队的传统角色。有趣的是,在2019年,美国海军陆战队司令大卫·H·伯杰将军提供了规划指导意见,他认为美国海军陆战队必须重返海上,加强海军一体化,扩大他们不仅从海上作战的能力,而且从海岸控制海上的能力。602有了这一规划指导,美国海军陆战队的理论、组织和使用必然会发生巨大的变化。虽然这些发展值得注意,但它们并非凭空出现的。全球一些国家的军队目前正在重新考虑两栖作战,并采取严厉措施,以弥补在理论、组织和训练方面存在的任何潜在不足。由于全球沿海地区前所未有的人口增长,未来两栖作战的可能性越来越大,气候变化对现有水道、河流和海洋的伴随影响,以及南中国海和北极等地区日益增长的政治争端,这些变化是必要的。2020年,海军陆战队大学出版社出版了蒂莫西·赫克和布雷特·弗里德曼主编的《在有争议的海岸:两栖作战在战争史上的演变作用》。这本书由23个关键章节组成,追溯了从16世纪到现在的两栖作战的历史演变,甚至展望了20世纪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信