Embodiment, Agency, and Ethics in Margarethe von Trotta’s Cinema: From Rosa Luxemburg (1986) to Hannah Arendt (2012)

IF 0.2 Q3 Social Sciences
C. Breger
{"title":"Embodiment, Agency, and Ethics in Margarethe von Trotta’s Cinema: From Rosa Luxemburg (1986) to Hannah Arendt (2012)","authors":"C. Breger","doi":"10.1353/fgs.2022.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article traces feminist filmmaking lineages from the New German Cinema into the twenty-first century via Margarethe von Trotta’s feature-length biopics. Conceptually, the article rethinks feminist authorship in response to twenty-first-century subject-critical frameworks, such as new materialism, Deleuzian philosophy, and actor-network theory. Connecting the third of these to feminist and queer performance studies and contemporary phenomenology, I propose a model of nonsovereign authorship that challenges traditional humanist (masculinist) conceptions of agency by emphasizing conditions and affordances of human embodiment and network entanglement. Importantly, this nonsovereignty does not void questions of intersectional feminist ethics and politics. Hannah Arendt’s focus on the Eichmann controversy and Arendt’s relationship with Martin Heidegger together facilitate layered reflections on embodiment, agency, and ethics on the diegetic level. On the level of production, von Trotta’s long-term collaborations with Barbara Sukowa and Pamela Katz allow me to apply the concept of networked authorship to the legacies of second-wave feminist theory and practice.","PeriodicalId":53717,"journal":{"name":"Feminist German Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"73 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist German Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fgs.2022.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article traces feminist filmmaking lineages from the New German Cinema into the twenty-first century via Margarethe von Trotta’s feature-length biopics. Conceptually, the article rethinks feminist authorship in response to twenty-first-century subject-critical frameworks, such as new materialism, Deleuzian philosophy, and actor-network theory. Connecting the third of these to feminist and queer performance studies and contemporary phenomenology, I propose a model of nonsovereign authorship that challenges traditional humanist (masculinist) conceptions of agency by emphasizing conditions and affordances of human embodiment and network entanglement. Importantly, this nonsovereignty does not void questions of intersectional feminist ethics and politics. Hannah Arendt’s focus on the Eichmann controversy and Arendt’s relationship with Martin Heidegger together facilitate layered reflections on embodiment, agency, and ethics on the diegetic level. On the level of production, von Trotta’s long-term collaborations with Barbara Sukowa and Pamela Katz allow me to apply the concept of networked authorship to the legacies of second-wave feminist theory and practice.
玛格丽特·冯·特洛塔电影中的化身、代理与伦理:从罗莎·卢森堡(1986)到汉娜·阿伦特(2012)
摘要:本文通过玛格丽特·冯·特洛塔的长篇传记片,追溯了从新德国电影到21世纪的女性主义电影创作脉络。在概念上,本文重新思考了女性主义作者身份,以回应21世纪的主体批判框架,如新唯物主义、德勒兹哲学和行动者网络理论。将第三个问题与女权主义和酷儿表演研究以及当代现象学联系起来,我提出了一个非主权作者的模型,通过强调人类具体化和网络纠缠的条件和能力,挑战传统的人文主义(男性主义)代理概念。重要的是,这种非主权并没有使交叉的女权主义伦理和政治问题无效。汉娜·阿伦特对艾希曼争议的关注,以及阿伦特与马丁·海德格尔的关系,共同促进了在叙事层面上对化身、代理和伦理的分层反思。在创作层面,冯·特洛塔与芭芭拉·苏科娃和帕梅拉·卡茨的长期合作使我能够将网络作者的概念应用于第二波女权主义理论和实践的遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Feminist German Studies
Feminist German Studies WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信