Effects of Soil Amendments on Arsenic Uptake by Earthworms(Eisenia fetida) in Arsenic-Polluted Soil

Ji-Hyock Yoo, K. Chon, O. Kwon, Jung Woo, Ji-Hyun Yoon
{"title":"Effects of Soil Amendments on Arsenic Uptake by Earthworms(Eisenia fetida) in Arsenic-Polluted Soil","authors":"Ji-Hyock Yoo, K. Chon, O. Kwon, Jung Woo, Ji-Hyun Yoon","doi":"10.36278/jeaht.25.4.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of soil amendments on arsenic (As) bioavailability in As-polluted soils. We determined the subsequent changes in As toxicity toward earthworms (Eisenia fetida) and As uptake by earthworms. We also investigated whether As bioaccumulation could be used as an index to evaluate changes in quality of As-polluted soils. No significant changes in acute toxicity to earthworms were observed, and the observed increases (70-93 mg kg-1) or decreases (27-38 mg kg-1) in bioavailable As in soils at the end of test were not related to the As concentrations in earthworms. The As concentration in earthworms 14 days after exposure was significantly lower in calcium superphosphate (CSP)- and S-treated soils (101.4-112.8 mg kg-1) than in control soil (138.9 mg kg-1), probably owing to reduced earthworm growth due to lower pH in CSP- and S-treated soils (6.3-7.3) relative to control and steel slag-treated soils (7.5-8.4). Comparisons of As toxicity and the effects of soil properties on this toxicity toward various species of earthworms could facilitate the use of earthworms to produce biological indices for evaluating changes in quality of As-polluted soils following amendment treatments.","PeriodicalId":15758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","volume":"484 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36278/jeaht.25.4.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of soil amendments on arsenic (As) bioavailability in As-polluted soils. We determined the subsequent changes in As toxicity toward earthworms (Eisenia fetida) and As uptake by earthworms. We also investigated whether As bioaccumulation could be used as an index to evaluate changes in quality of As-polluted soils. No significant changes in acute toxicity to earthworms were observed, and the observed increases (70-93 mg kg-1) or decreases (27-38 mg kg-1) in bioavailable As in soils at the end of test were not related to the As concentrations in earthworms. The As concentration in earthworms 14 days after exposure was significantly lower in calcium superphosphate (CSP)- and S-treated soils (101.4-112.8 mg kg-1) than in control soil (138.9 mg kg-1), probably owing to reduced earthworm growth due to lower pH in CSP- and S-treated soils (6.3-7.3) relative to control and steel slag-treated soils (7.5-8.4). Comparisons of As toxicity and the effects of soil properties on this toxicity toward various species of earthworms could facilitate the use of earthworms to produce biological indices for evaluating changes in quality of As-polluted soils following amendment treatments.
土壤改良剂对砷污染土壤中蚯蚓吸收砷的影响
研究了土壤改良剂对砷污染土壤中砷(As)生物有效性的影响。我们测定了砷对蚯蚓(Eisenia fetida)毒性的变化和蚯蚓对砷的吸收。我们还研究了砷的生物积累是否可以作为评价砷污染土壤质量变化的指标。对蚯蚓的急性毒性没有显著变化,试验结束时土壤中生物可利用性砷的增加(70 ~ 93 mg kg-1)或减少(27 ~ 38 mg kg-1)与蚯蚓体内的砷浓度无关。暴露14天后,过磷酸钙(CSP)和硫处理土壤中蚯蚓的砷浓度(101.4 ~ 112.8 mg kg-1)显著低于对照土壤(138.9 mg kg-1),这可能是由于CSP和硫处理土壤的pH值(6.3 ~ 7.3)低于对照和钢渣处理土壤(7.5 ~ 8.4),从而降低了蚯蚓的生长。比较砷对不同种类蚯蚓的毒性及土壤性质对其毒性的影响,有助于利用蚯蚓建立评价砷污染土壤改良后质量变化的生物学指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信