Communicating mathematical ideas in a digital writing environment: the impacts on mathematical reasoning for students with and without learning disabilities

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
J. Angelo, K. Higgins, Lindy Crawford
{"title":"Communicating mathematical ideas in a digital writing environment: the impacts on mathematical reasoning for students with and without learning disabilities","authors":"J. Angelo, K. Higgins, Lindy Crawford","doi":"10.15388/sw.2014.28186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematical reasoning is often underdeveloped in students with learning disabilities (LD). Problem solving and reasoning represent one of the most important aspects of a mathematics curriculum. The purpose of the present study was to examine how communication through writing in mathematics via a digital environment impacts the mathematical reasoning of students with and without LD. Specifically, the research was guided by research questions: (1) What differences exist between the mathematical reasoning of students with and without LD prior to and after using a digital writing environment? (2) How does use of the digital writing environment differ between students with and without LD? (3) To what extent does student reasoning change overtime when emphasis is placed on communication via writing in mathematics? Oral reading and math fact fluency as well as participants’ working memory were used as academic variables. The Math Reasoning Inventory (MRI; Burns, 2012) is a formative assessment designed to evaluate mathematical reasoning through a face-to-face interview. The primary focus is on core numerical reasoning strategies and understanding. Subjects participated in an intervention focused on communication in mathematics through the use of digital writing tools in a computer-based mathematics program. Results reveal that communication through writing or peer-based discussions around mathematics can impact students’ reasoning skills. Reasoning is a fundamental skill in mathematics and remains an area in which students with LD continuously struggle; therefore, interventions focused on advancing student reasoning will be increasingly pivotal to mathematics education. Students in this study showed improvement in different areas of reasoning over the course of the intervention and responded differently to the types of writing environments that were offered. Regardless of which digital environment was preferred by students with and without LD, results demonstrated that incorporating writing into mathematics to communicate mathematical information benefited all students in this study and has the potential to impact mathematics education.","PeriodicalId":41093,"journal":{"name":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/sw.2014.28186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Mathematical reasoning is often underdeveloped in students with learning disabilities (LD). Problem solving and reasoning represent one of the most important aspects of a mathematics curriculum. The purpose of the present study was to examine how communication through writing in mathematics via a digital environment impacts the mathematical reasoning of students with and without LD. Specifically, the research was guided by research questions: (1) What differences exist between the mathematical reasoning of students with and without LD prior to and after using a digital writing environment? (2) How does use of the digital writing environment differ between students with and without LD? (3) To what extent does student reasoning change overtime when emphasis is placed on communication via writing in mathematics? Oral reading and math fact fluency as well as participants’ working memory were used as academic variables. The Math Reasoning Inventory (MRI; Burns, 2012) is a formative assessment designed to evaluate mathematical reasoning through a face-to-face interview. The primary focus is on core numerical reasoning strategies and understanding. Subjects participated in an intervention focused on communication in mathematics through the use of digital writing tools in a computer-based mathematics program. Results reveal that communication through writing or peer-based discussions around mathematics can impact students’ reasoning skills. Reasoning is a fundamental skill in mathematics and remains an area in which students with LD continuously struggle; therefore, interventions focused on advancing student reasoning will be increasingly pivotal to mathematics education. Students in this study showed improvement in different areas of reasoning over the course of the intervention and responded differently to the types of writing environments that were offered. Regardless of which digital environment was preferred by students with and without LD, results demonstrated that incorporating writing into mathematics to communicate mathematical information benefited all students in this study and has the potential to impact mathematics education.
在数字写作环境中交流数学思想:对有和无学习障碍学生数学推理的影响
学习障碍学生的数学推理能力往往不发达。解决问题和推理是数学课程中最重要的方面之一。本研究的目的是研究数字环境下的数学写作交流如何影响有和没有学习障碍的学生的数学推理。具体而言,研究的指导问题是:(1)在使用数字写作环境之前和之后,有和没有学习障碍的学生的数学推理存在什么差异?(2)有和没有阅读障碍的学生对数字写作环境的使用有何不同?(3)当数学课程强调通过写作进行交流时,学生的推理能力在多大程度上发生了变化?口头阅读和数学事实流畅性以及参与者的工作记忆被用作学术变量。数学推理量表(MRI);Burns, 2012)是一种形成性评估,旨在通过面对面的面试来评估数学推理。主要的焦点是核心的数值推理策略和理解。受试者参与了一项干预,重点是通过使用基于计算机的数学程序中的数字写作工具进行数学交流。研究结果表明,通过写作或基于同伴的数学讨论进行交流可以影响学生的推理能力。推理是数学的一项基本技能,也是LD学生一直在努力的领域;因此,以提高学生推理能力为重点的干预措施对数学教育将越来越重要。在这项研究中,学生在干预过程中在不同的推理领域表现出了进步,并且对所提供的写作环境的类型做出了不同的反应。无论有和没有学习障碍的学生更喜欢哪种数字环境,结果表明,将写作融入数学以交流数学信息使本研究中的所有学生受益,并有可能影响数学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信