Criminal Law Cooperation After Brexit and the Paradox of Passenger Name Records: More Comprehensive Cooperation with Less Data Protection?

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
De Jure Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.54664/gyei2791
M. Pencheva
{"title":"Criminal Law Cooperation After Brexit and the Paradox of Passenger Name Records: More Comprehensive Cooperation with Less Data Protection?","authors":"M. Pencheva","doi":"10.54664/gyei2791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After Brexit, a certain paradox can be observed in the cooperation between the EU and the UK on passenger name record (PNR) data. While Brexit leads by definition to fewer possibilities for criminal law cooperation between the EU and the UK and to a narrower level of cooperation achieved so far, it seems to have led to an increase in the possibilities for processing PNR data of EU citizens and to lower standards of personal data protection. The question arises as to whether this is compatible with the EU Charter and with the case law of the CJEU.","PeriodicalId":41915,"journal":{"name":"De Jure","volume":"210 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/gyei2791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After Brexit, a certain paradox can be observed in the cooperation between the EU and the UK on passenger name record (PNR) data. While Brexit leads by definition to fewer possibilities for criminal law cooperation between the EU and the UK and to a narrower level of cooperation achieved so far, it seems to have led to an increase in the possibilities for processing PNR data of EU citizens and to lower standards of personal data protection. The question arises as to whether this is compatible with the EU Charter and with the case law of the CJEU.
脱欧后的刑法合作与旅客姓名记录悖论:更全面的合作与更少的数据保护?
英国脱欧后,欧盟与英国在旅客姓名记录(PNR)数据方面的合作出现了一定的悖论。虽然从定义上讲,英国脱欧导致欧盟和英国之间刑法合作的可能性减少,到目前为止实现的合作水平也较窄,但它似乎导致了处理欧盟公民PNR数据的可能性增加,并降低了个人数据保护的标准。问题是,这是否符合《欧盟宪章》和欧洲法院的判例法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
De Jure
De Jure LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信