The Future of Christian Spiritual Formation

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
Steven L. Porter
{"title":"The Future of Christian Spiritual Formation","authors":"Steven L. Porter","doi":"10.1177/19397909231173908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction If we are not following Jesus in the way he is leading, then we are not following Jesus. We have been told the road is narrow and few are those who find it. Indeed, there are a great number of alternative, broad ways vying for our attention that subtly or not so subtly distort Jesus and his overall manner of life. In our day, this includes the broadest alternative there could possibly be: the modern way of life that holds out to us that there is no way except whatever way you want. Something like “each one does what is right in their own eyes” has become a basic human right, at least in the western world. To proclaim, instead, that there are better paths of life than whichever we might find personally appealing—even a best way of life—cuts against the grain of what Charles Taylor has called “the immanent frame.” The immanent frame of modernity sets our eyes on the concrete immediately in front of our own two feet, our inevitable and causally closed next step. The call to a big-picture, transcendent frame that leads us in “paths of righteousness for his name’s sake” tends to fall flat these days. The future of Christian spiritual formation has everything to do with whether Jesus and his way, truth, and life—a kingdom “not of this world”—will be seen as a viable vision of living a good life and becoming a good person. And this, it seems to me, has everything to do with whether Jesus’ people—the body of Christ—effectively model the actuality of such a life.","PeriodicalId":36836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"3 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19397909231173908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction If we are not following Jesus in the way he is leading, then we are not following Jesus. We have been told the road is narrow and few are those who find it. Indeed, there are a great number of alternative, broad ways vying for our attention that subtly or not so subtly distort Jesus and his overall manner of life. In our day, this includes the broadest alternative there could possibly be: the modern way of life that holds out to us that there is no way except whatever way you want. Something like “each one does what is right in their own eyes” has become a basic human right, at least in the western world. To proclaim, instead, that there are better paths of life than whichever we might find personally appealing—even a best way of life—cuts against the grain of what Charles Taylor has called “the immanent frame.” The immanent frame of modernity sets our eyes on the concrete immediately in front of our own two feet, our inevitable and causally closed next step. The call to a big-picture, transcendent frame that leads us in “paths of righteousness for his name’s sake” tends to fall flat these days. The future of Christian spiritual formation has everything to do with whether Jesus and his way, truth, and life—a kingdom “not of this world”—will be seen as a viable vision of living a good life and becoming a good person. And this, it seems to me, has everything to do with whether Jesus’ people—the body of Christ—effectively model the actuality of such a life.
基督教属灵培育的未来
如果我们没有按照耶稣所带领的方式来跟随他,那么我们就不是在跟随耶稣。我们被告知这条路很窄,很少有人能找到它。事实上,有很多不同的、广泛的方式吸引着我们的注意力,这些方式或微妙或不那么微妙地扭曲了耶稣和他的整体生活方式。在我们这个时代,这包括了可能存在的最广泛的选择:现代生活方式告诉我们,除了你想要的方式,没有别的办法。“每个人都做自己认为正确的事”已经成为一项基本人权,至少在西方世界是这样。相反,宣称有比我们可能找到的个人吸引力更好的生活道路——甚至是最好的生活方式——与查尔斯·泰勒所说的“内在框架”背道而驰。现代性的内在框架将我们的目光集中在我们双脚前的混凝土上,这是我们不可避免的、偶然关闭的下一步。这些天来,呼唤一个大局观、超然的框架,引导我们走上“为他的名而义的道路”,往往会落空。基督徒属灵培育的未来与耶稣和他的道路、真理和生命——一个“不属于这个世界”的国度——是否会被视为过好生活和成为一个好人的可行异象有关。在我看来,这一切都与耶稣的子民——基督的身体——是否有效地模拟了这种生活的现实有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care
Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信