Comparative analysis of wireless sensor networks with wireless multimedia sensor networks

A. Mateen, Maida Sehar, Khizar Abbas, Muhammad Azeem Akbar
{"title":"Comparative analysis of wireless sensor networks with wireless multimedia sensor networks","authors":"A. Mateen, Maida Sehar, Khizar Abbas, Muhammad Azeem Akbar","doi":"10.1109/ICPCSI.2017.8391847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) abiding a huge quantity of inexpensive, low consumption and intense sensor nodes and sole or additional decline or base stations. Those nodes are tiny in dimension and can carry out numerous significant affairs, as well as event sensing, in order processing, and data communication. Owed to different compensation such as simplicity of consumption, comprehensive transmission range, and identity association, WSNs have been interchanging the conventional networks. The promising and innovative network of wirelessly connected devices, which consist of video, audio streams, scalar sensor data and others, is Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network (WMSN). The multimedia data depends on superiority to overhaul (Qos) parameters, like await, channel utilization, network life time throughput and distortion etc is the main aim to optimized delivery of these networks. In multimedia network each packets are communicated with each other so not on time incoming packets and lots of packets are evenly. In WMSNs challenging task to guarantee resource constrained, high data rate, and soft delay limit beside with energy reduced. In this paper, we provide Survey on comparison of different protocol of Wireless sensor network and wirelesss multimedia sensor network like Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks (GPSR), Real-time and Energy Aware Qos routing protocol (REAR), Temporary ordered routing Algorithm (TORA) and Dynamic source routing (DSR). This different protocols with WMSN are compared in requisites of throughput, end-to-end delay, network life time.","PeriodicalId":6589,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering (ICPCSI)","volume":"6 1","pages":"80-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering (ICPCSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSI.2017.8391847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) abiding a huge quantity of inexpensive, low consumption and intense sensor nodes and sole or additional decline or base stations. Those nodes are tiny in dimension and can carry out numerous significant affairs, as well as event sensing, in order processing, and data communication. Owed to different compensation such as simplicity of consumption, comprehensive transmission range, and identity association, WSNs have been interchanging the conventional networks. The promising and innovative network of wirelessly connected devices, which consist of video, audio streams, scalar sensor data and others, is Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network (WMSN). The multimedia data depends on superiority to overhaul (Qos) parameters, like await, channel utilization, network life time throughput and distortion etc is the main aim to optimized delivery of these networks. In multimedia network each packets are communicated with each other so not on time incoming packets and lots of packets are evenly. In WMSNs challenging task to guarantee resource constrained, high data rate, and soft delay limit beside with energy reduced. In this paper, we provide Survey on comparison of different protocol of Wireless sensor network and wirelesss multimedia sensor network like Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks (GPSR), Real-time and Energy Aware Qos routing protocol (REAR), Temporary ordered routing Algorithm (TORA) and Dynamic source routing (DSR). This different protocols with WMSN are compared in requisites of throughput, end-to-end delay, network life time.
无线传感器网络与无线多媒体传感器网络的比较分析
无线传感器网络(WSNs)需要大量廉价、低消耗、密集的传感器节点和唯一或额外的衰落或基站。这些节点在维度上很小,可以执行许多重要的事务,以及事件感知、订单处理和数据通信。由于使用简单、传输范围广、身份关联等不同的补偿,无线传感器网络正在取代传统网络。无线多媒体传感器网络(Wireless Multimedia sensor network, WMSN)是由视频、音频流、标量传感器数据等组成的无线连接设备网络。多媒体数据依赖于等待、信道利用率、网络寿命吞吐量和失真等Qos参数的优势,是优化网络传输的主要目标。在多媒体网络中,每个数据包都是相互通信的,因此不能按时接收数据包,而大量数据包是均匀分布的。在wmsn中,既要保证资源受限,又要保证高数据速率和软延迟限制,同时又要降低能耗。本文对无线传感器网络和无线多媒体传感器网络中的贪婪边界无状态路由协议(GPSR)、实时和能量感知Qos路由协议(REAR)、临时有序路由算法(TORA)和动态源路由(DSR)等协议进行了综述比较。在吞吐量、端到端延迟、网络生存时间等方面对不同的WMSN协议进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信