Evaluating the thickness of thin-bed seams using seismic data on the example of the Tula-Bobrikovian sediments in the Republic of Tatarstan

B. Platov, R. I. Khairutdinova, A. Kadirov
{"title":"Evaluating the thickness of thin-bed seams using seismic data on the example of the Tula-Bobrikovian sediments in the Republic of Tatarstan","authors":"B. Platov, R. I. Khairutdinova, A. Kadirov","doi":"10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-4-80-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Determining the productive deposit thickness is of fundamental importance for assessing the reserves of oil and gas fields. 3D seismic data is used to assess the thickness of seams in the interwell space. However, owing to the limited vertical resolution of seismic data, estimating thicknesses of thin deposits (less than 20 m) is challenging.Aim. To evaluate different approaches to calculating the thickness of the productive deposits based on seismic data with the purpose of selecting the most optimal approach.Materials and methods. We compared the results obtained using different approaches to assessing the productive deposit thickness of the Tula-Bobrikovian age in the interwell space, including the convergence method (calculating the thickness for oilwells with no seismic data used), the use of seismic attributes to calculate the “seismic attribute — reservoir thickness” dependency (for attributes, dominant frequency and mono-frequency component at 60 Hz), estimation of the thickness from the seismic signal shape. Cokriging was used to calculate inferred power maps from seismic attribute data and to classify them by waveform. For each of the techniques, the crossvalidation method and calculating the root-mean-square deviation were used as quality criteria.Results. When assessing the accuracy of thickness map development, the root-mean-square deviation was 12.3 m according to convergence method, 10.2 m — to the dominant frequency attribute, 7.2 m — to the attribute of the monofrequency component at 60 Hz and 6.3 m — to the signal shape classification. The latter method yielded the best results, and the developed thickness map allowed paleo-cut to be traced.Conclusions. Applying the thickness estimation method based on the seismic signal shape allows the value of the root-mean-square deviation to be reduced by a factor of 2 compared to that of the widely adopted convergence method. This approach permits productive deposits thickness to be more accurately estimated and hydrocarbon reserves to be determined.","PeriodicalId":33343,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka","volume":"242 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Geologiia i razvedka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-4-80-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Determining the productive deposit thickness is of fundamental importance for assessing the reserves of oil and gas fields. 3D seismic data is used to assess the thickness of seams in the interwell space. However, owing to the limited vertical resolution of seismic data, estimating thicknesses of thin deposits (less than 20 m) is challenging.Aim. To evaluate different approaches to calculating the thickness of the productive deposits based on seismic data with the purpose of selecting the most optimal approach.Materials and methods. We compared the results obtained using different approaches to assessing the productive deposit thickness of the Tula-Bobrikovian age in the interwell space, including the convergence method (calculating the thickness for oilwells with no seismic data used), the use of seismic attributes to calculate the “seismic attribute — reservoir thickness” dependency (for attributes, dominant frequency and mono-frequency component at 60 Hz), estimation of the thickness from the seismic signal shape. Cokriging was used to calculate inferred power maps from seismic attribute data and to classify them by waveform. For each of the techniques, the crossvalidation method and calculating the root-mean-square deviation were used as quality criteria.Results. When assessing the accuracy of thickness map development, the root-mean-square deviation was 12.3 m according to convergence method, 10.2 m — to the dominant frequency attribute, 7.2 m — to the attribute of the monofrequency component at 60 Hz and 6.3 m — to the signal shape classification. The latter method yielded the best results, and the developed thickness map allowed paleo-cut to be traced.Conclusions. Applying the thickness estimation method based on the seismic signal shape allows the value of the root-mean-square deviation to be reduced by a factor of 2 compared to that of the widely adopted convergence method. This approach permits productive deposits thickness to be more accurately estimated and hydrocarbon reserves to be determined.
用地震资料评价鞑靼斯坦共和国图拉-博布里科夫沉积物薄层厚度
背景。生产层厚度的确定是油气田储量评价的基础。三维地震数据用于评估井间空间的煤层厚度。然而,由于地震资料的垂直分辨率有限,估计薄沉积物(小于20 m)的厚度是具有挑战性的。评价基于地震资料计算生产层厚度的不同方法,以选择最优方法。材料和方法。我们比较了不同方法在井间空间评估Tula-Bobrikovian时代生产层厚度的结果,包括收敛方法(计算没有使用地震数据的油井厚度),使用地震属性来计算“地震属性-储层厚度”的依赖关系(属性,主频和60 Hz的单频分量),从地震信号形状估计厚度。利用协同克里格法从地震属性数据中计算推断功率图,并按波形进行分类。采用交叉验证法和计算均方根偏差作为质量标准。在评估厚度图绘制精度时,收敛法的均方根偏差为12.3 m,主频属性偏差为10.2 m, 60 Hz单频分量属性偏差为7.2 m,信号形状分类偏差为6.3 m。后一种方法的效果最好,开发的厚度图可用于古切割的追溯。采用基于地震信号形状的厚度估计方法,与广泛采用的收敛方法相比,均方根偏差的值减小了2倍。这种方法可以更准确地估计生产层的厚度,并确定油气储量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信