Comparative Analysis of Molecular Methods for Detection of Influenza Viruses

Vikrant Sharma, S. Kaushik
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Molecular Methods for Detection of Influenza Viruses","authors":"Vikrant Sharma, S. Kaushik","doi":"10.9734/BMRJ/2016/28858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Influenza is a serious threat to human population worldwide therefore continuous surveillance is required to update influenza seasonal vaccines. A rapid, sensitive, specific and cost effective diagnostic method will be much helpful for patient management in the present scenario. Present study is conceptualized for detection of influenza viruses by molecular methods and compare with ‘gold standard’ virus isolation. Study Design: Standard strains of Influenza virus were used to standardize the molecular diagnostic assays and results were then compared with virus isolation. Place and Duration of Study: Centre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India, between December 2015 and April 2016. Methodology: Standard strains of Influenza A and B virus were used for influenza virus isolation using virus culturing in MDCK (Madin-Darby Canine Kidney) cell line by following standard tissue culture procedure. Isolated viruses were detected by Hemagglutination assay (HA) and typed by Hemagglutination inhibition assay (HI). Conventional one step RT-PCR, Taqman real time RT-PCR and RT-LAMP (Reverse transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification) were standardized on RNA extracted from standard strains. Sensitivity and specificity of these molecular methods were Original Research Article Sharma and Kaushik; BMRJ, 17(3): 1-10, 2016; Article no.BMRJ.28858 2 compared with each other as well as with virus culture (gold standard). Results: Both influenza A and B virus strains were cultured in MDCK cells and produced cytopathic effect during virus culture. Conventional RT-PCR and real time RT-PCR detected both type of Influenza viruses. RT-LAMP also successfully detected and typed influenza viruses. RTLAMP proved to be more rapid than other two molecular assays. Conclusion: Molecular diagnostic methods are useful in detection and typing of Influenza viruses and these methods provide results in short period of time when compared with traditional virus culture methods. RT-LAMP is rapid, sensitive, specific and cost effective method for influenza virus detection and subtyping.","PeriodicalId":9269,"journal":{"name":"British microbiology research journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British microbiology research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BMRJ/2016/28858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Aims: Influenza is a serious threat to human population worldwide therefore continuous surveillance is required to update influenza seasonal vaccines. A rapid, sensitive, specific and cost effective diagnostic method will be much helpful for patient management in the present scenario. Present study is conceptualized for detection of influenza viruses by molecular methods and compare with ‘gold standard’ virus isolation. Study Design: Standard strains of Influenza virus were used to standardize the molecular diagnostic assays and results were then compared with virus isolation. Place and Duration of Study: Centre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India, between December 2015 and April 2016. Methodology: Standard strains of Influenza A and B virus were used for influenza virus isolation using virus culturing in MDCK (Madin-Darby Canine Kidney) cell line by following standard tissue culture procedure. Isolated viruses were detected by Hemagglutination assay (HA) and typed by Hemagglutination inhibition assay (HI). Conventional one step RT-PCR, Taqman real time RT-PCR and RT-LAMP (Reverse transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification) were standardized on RNA extracted from standard strains. Sensitivity and specificity of these molecular methods were Original Research Article Sharma and Kaushik; BMRJ, 17(3): 1-10, 2016; Article no.BMRJ.28858 2 compared with each other as well as with virus culture (gold standard). Results: Both influenza A and B virus strains were cultured in MDCK cells and produced cytopathic effect during virus culture. Conventional RT-PCR and real time RT-PCR detected both type of Influenza viruses. RT-LAMP also successfully detected and typed influenza viruses. RTLAMP proved to be more rapid than other two molecular assays. Conclusion: Molecular diagnostic methods are useful in detection and typing of Influenza viruses and these methods provide results in short period of time when compared with traditional virus culture methods. RT-LAMP is rapid, sensitive, specific and cost effective method for influenza virus detection and subtyping.
流感病毒分子检测方法的比较分析
目的:流感是对全世界人口的严重威胁,因此需要持续监测以更新流感季节性疫苗。在这种情况下,一种快速、灵敏、特异和经济有效的诊断方法将对患者管理有很大帮助。本研究的概念是用分子方法检测流感病毒,并与“金标准”病毒分离进行比较。研究设计:采用流感病毒标准株进行标准化分子诊断分析,并将结果与病毒分离进行比较。学习地点和时间:2015年12月至2016年4月,印度哈里亚纳邦罗塔克Maharshi Dayanand大学生物技术中心。方法:采用标准的组织培养程序,在MDCK (Madin-Darby犬肾)细胞株上进行病毒培养,分离甲型流感病毒和乙型流感病毒标准株。分离病毒采用血凝试验(HA)检测,血凝抑制试验(HI)分型。对标准菌株提取的RNA进行常规一步RT-PCR、Taqman实时RT-PCR和RT-LAMP(逆转录环介导等温扩增)标准化。这些分子方法的敏感性和特异性分别为Sharma和Kaushik;中国生物医学工程学报,17(3):1-10,2016;文章no.BMRJ。28858 2相互比较,并与病毒培养(金标准)。结果:甲型和乙型流感病毒株均能在MDCK细胞中培养,并在培养过程中产生细胞病变效应。常规RT-PCR和实时RT-PCR检测两种流感病毒。RT-LAMP还成功地检测和分型流感病毒。RTLAMP比其他两种分子检测方法更快。结论:分子诊断方法可用于流感病毒的检测和分型,与传统的病毒培养方法相比可在短时间内获得结果。RT-LAMP是一种快速、灵敏、特异、经济有效的流感病毒检测和分型方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信