The never-ending search

R. Radermacher
{"title":"The never-ending search","authors":"R. Radermacher","doi":"10.1080/10789669.2014.964113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attending the 2014 Gustav Lorentzen Conference in Hangzhou, China, August 31 through September 2, reinforced my view that there is no consensus yet about which emerging refrigerants will be a long-term solution for heat pumping and refrigeration. Whatever fluids are under consideration force a compromise between mitigating local versus global perils (toxicity and flammability versus global warming). So, what does this mean for the research community? The obvious answer is the continued need for research that addresses the typical tasks: measurement of thermo-physical properties, of heat transfer coefficients, and pressure drop and finally the design and testing of new, well-matched heat pump components. These tasks are closely related to the actual performance of the fluid in a refrigeration or heat pumping system. In addition there more general tasks, such as flammability assessment, material compatibility, risk analyses, and time-intensive evaluation of short-term and long-term toxicity. It appears that these tasks become routine and are just a matter of cost. The less obvious approach could have the research community embarking on novel approaches. This could entail bringing non-vapor compression technologies to a performance and maturity level where it can displace conventional refrigerants, or developing heat pump designs for which the hardware functions well and is reliably independent of refrigerant choice, or pushing molecular thermodynamics to a level where accurate property predictions can be made based on the molecular structure alone. There may be new materials where leaks heal themselves, avoiding refrigerant leakage loss, or technologies that minimize charge to a degree where the direct global warming contribution becomes inconsequential. These are just a few examples, I am sure there are many more such ideas. It may be the outcome of these less conventional research goals that may eventually determine the technologies and/or fluids that will be in use for a longer term.","PeriodicalId":13238,"journal":{"name":"HVAC&R Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"845 - 845"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HVAC&R Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2014.964113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attending the 2014 Gustav Lorentzen Conference in Hangzhou, China, August 31 through September 2, reinforced my view that there is no consensus yet about which emerging refrigerants will be a long-term solution for heat pumping and refrigeration. Whatever fluids are under consideration force a compromise between mitigating local versus global perils (toxicity and flammability versus global warming). So, what does this mean for the research community? The obvious answer is the continued need for research that addresses the typical tasks: measurement of thermo-physical properties, of heat transfer coefficients, and pressure drop and finally the design and testing of new, well-matched heat pump components. These tasks are closely related to the actual performance of the fluid in a refrigeration or heat pumping system. In addition there more general tasks, such as flammability assessment, material compatibility, risk analyses, and time-intensive evaluation of short-term and long-term toxicity. It appears that these tasks become routine and are just a matter of cost. The less obvious approach could have the research community embarking on novel approaches. This could entail bringing non-vapor compression technologies to a performance and maturity level where it can displace conventional refrigerants, or developing heat pump designs for which the hardware functions well and is reliably independent of refrigerant choice, or pushing molecular thermodynamics to a level where accurate property predictions can be made based on the molecular structure alone. There may be new materials where leaks heal themselves, avoiding refrigerant leakage loss, or technologies that minimize charge to a degree where the direct global warming contribution becomes inconsequential. These are just a few examples, I am sure there are many more such ideas. It may be the outcome of these less conventional research goals that may eventually determine the technologies and/or fluids that will be in use for a longer term.
永无止境的搜索
2014年8月31日至9月2日在中国杭州举行的古斯塔夫·洛伦岑会议(Gustav Lorentzen Conference)强化了我的观点,即对于哪种新兴制冷剂将成为热泵和制冷的长期解决方案,目前还没有达成共识。无论考虑何种液体,都必须在减轻局部危险与全球危险(毒性和可燃性与全球变暖)之间做出妥协。那么,这对研究界意味着什么呢?显而易见的答案是继续需要研究解决典型任务:测量热物理特性,传热系数和压降,最后设计和测试新的,匹配良好的热泵组件。这些任务与制冷或热泵系统中流体的实际性能密切相关。此外,还有更多的一般任务,如可燃性评估、材料相容性、风险分析以及短期和长期毒性的耗时评估。这些任务似乎变成了例行公事,只是成本问题。这种不太明显的方法可能会让研究界开始采用新的方法。这可能需要将非蒸汽压缩技术提高到性能和成熟度,以取代传统制冷剂,或者开发硬件功能良好且可靠地独立于制冷剂选择的热泵设计,或者将分子热力学提高到可以仅根据分子结构进行准确性能预测的水平。可能会有新的材料可以使泄漏自愈,避免制冷剂泄漏损失,或者技术可以将电荷减少到一定程度,从而使直接的全球变暖贡献变得无关紧要。这只是几个例子,我相信还有更多这样的想法。这些非常规研究目标的结果可能最终决定将长期使用的技术和/或流体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HVAC&R Research
HVAC&R Research 工程技术-工程:机械
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信