Elena G. Procario-Foley, R. van Allen
{"title":"From the Editor","authors":"Elena G. Procario-Foley, R. van Allen","doi":"10.1017/hor.2023.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Happy Golden Anniversary, Horizons! This issue marks the first edition of volume fifty. The entire editorial staff is excited to bring our readers a celebration of fifty years of Horizons: The Journal of the College Theology Society. We decided that the fiftieth anniversary of a journal of Catholic theology created in the optimistic spirit of Vatican II and operated by the lay women and men who formed the College Theology Society deserved a two-volume celebration. The collective four issues of volumes fifty and fifty-one, therefore, will each feature an anniversary “Retrospective and Prospective” roundtable. The anniversary roundtable will reprint an article that the editors have deemed “a greatest hit” forHorizons. We will reprint the article and two scholars will respond to the article, noting its significance for its time and commenting on the needs of the present with regard to the topic at hand. We are also planning on brief reflections from former editors to be highlighted in this space. Finally, see the Horizons website for a special anniversary section that we will build out over the two-year celebration. In this issue, our anniversary roundtable features Raymond E. Brown’s article from Horizons : (), “‘Who Do Men Say that I Am?’—Modern Scholarship on Gospel Christology.” Pheme Perkins, Boston College, and Gilberto A. Ruiz, Saint Anselm College, respond. I would be remiss if I did not note that the Reverend Donald J. Senior, CP agreed to write for the inaugural anniversary roundtable. The staff of Horizonsmourns his death. We are grateful to Pheme Perkins for agreeing to take Senior’s place and to place her work in conversation with her former student (G. Ruiz). Immediately following my introduction, founding coeditor Rodger Van Allen provides insights on the naming and founding of Horizons as a preface to reprinting his account of the origins of the journal. The current editors believe it is important to highlight our “origin story” for a new generation of readers and contributors. The authors of our peerreviewed articles invite us to pause and consider the nature of our theological work in light of the pandemic; to probe the conundrum of the theological claim of the holiness of a church filled with sinful members; to query documents of the Eastern Orthodox Church and their understanding of the imago Dei as it relates to people with disabilities; and to reflect on the possible consequences for theological anthropology from taking the full humanity of adolescents and young adults seriously. The issue is rounded off by a Horizons, , pp. iii–viii. © College Theology Society doi:10.1017/hor.2023.2","PeriodicalId":13231,"journal":{"name":"Horizons","volume":"10 1","pages":"iii - viii"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hor.2023.2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
来自编辑
地平线,金婚快乐!本期是第五十卷的第一版。全体编辑人员都很兴奋地为我们的读者带来五十周年的庆祝活动:《大学神学学会杂志》。我们决定,一本天主教神学期刊创刊五十周年,是本着梵二会议的乐观精神创刊的,由组成大学神学协会的平信徒男女经营,值得用两卷来庆祝。因此,第50卷和51卷共四期将分别以周年纪念“回顾与展望”圆桌会议为特色。周年纪念圆桌会议将转载一篇编辑们认为是《地平线》杂志“最成功”的文章。我们将重印这篇文章,两位学者将对这篇文章作出回应,指出它在当时的意义,并就当前的主题发表评论。我们还计划在这个空间中突出显示前编辑的简短反思。最后,请访问地平线网站,我们将在两年的庆祝活动中建立一个特别的周年纪念部分。在这一期,我们的周年纪念圆桌会议将特别介绍Raymond E. Brown在Horizons:()上的文章,“男人说我是谁?”《福音基督论的现代学术》波士顿学院的Pheme Perkins和圣安瑟姆学院的Gilberto A. Ruiz做出了回应。如果我没有注意到老唐纳德牧师同意为成立周年圆桌会议写文章,那我就太疏忽了。地平线的工作人员哀悼他的去世。我们感谢Pheme Perkins同意代替Senior的位置,并将她的工作与她以前的学生(G. Ruiz)进行对话。在我的介绍之后,创始共同编辑罗杰·范·艾伦提供了对《地平线》命名和创立的见解,作为重印他对该杂志起源的描述的序言。现任编辑认为,为新一代读者和贡献者强调我们的“起源故事”是很重要的。我们的同行评议文章的作者邀请我们停下来,根据疫情考虑我们神学工作的性质;探讨一个充满罪人的教会的神圣性的神学主张的难题;查询东正教会的文件,以及他们对与残疾人士有关的上帝形象的理解;并反思认真对待青少年和年轻人的完整人性对神学人类学可能产生的后果。这一问题在《地平线》中得到圆满解决,,第3 - 8页。©大学神学协会doi:10.1017/hor.2023.2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。