Problems of Ethnic (Ethno-Cultural) Identity in Scientific Literature in the Second Half of the 20th – 21st Century (To the Course “Fundamentals of Cultural Anthropology”)

Q2 Arts and Humanities
E. Fursova
{"title":"Problems of Ethnic (Ethno-Cultural) Identity in Scientific Literature in the Second Half of the 20th – 21st Century (To the Course “Fundamentals of Cultural Anthropology”)","authors":"E. Fursova","doi":"10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-3-9-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The article presents an analysis of the most famous works on the problems of ethnic / ethnocultural identity, which include publications not only by cultural anthropologists, but also by psychologists, philosophers, sociologists, culturologists, etc. The author proceeds from the understanding that the term “identity” when due to its relationship with such concepts as “self-consciousness”, “self”, “I-concept”, “I-image” has not yet acquired an unambiguous interpretation, a single definition of this concept shared by all scientists.Results. In accordance with scientific positions, a number of approaches to the study of identity, its structure, the content of its components, including the ethnocultural one, have been identified. Various interpretations of this phenomenon are revealed from the perspective of primordialism, instrumentalism, constructivism in the works of Russians and foreign scientists. Particular attention is paid to works on the relationship between ethnic and regional identities, the relationship between social transformations and the processes of ethnic formation, confessional and a number of other identities.Conclusion. An analysis of trends in the development of the modern problem of ethnic / ethnocultural identity shows that many of the constructed concepts have not yet become the result of empirical research, but rather are the fruit of reflections that cannot always be applied to the proper degree.","PeriodicalId":36462,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriya: Istoriya, Filologiya","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriya: Istoriya, Filologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-3-9-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose. The article presents an analysis of the most famous works on the problems of ethnic / ethnocultural identity, which include publications not only by cultural anthropologists, but also by psychologists, philosophers, sociologists, culturologists, etc. The author proceeds from the understanding that the term “identity” when due to its relationship with such concepts as “self-consciousness”, “self”, “I-concept”, “I-image” has not yet acquired an unambiguous interpretation, a single definition of this concept shared by all scientists.Results. In accordance with scientific positions, a number of approaches to the study of identity, its structure, the content of its components, including the ethnocultural one, have been identified. Various interpretations of this phenomenon are revealed from the perspective of primordialism, instrumentalism, constructivism in the works of Russians and foreign scientists. Particular attention is paid to works on the relationship between ethnic and regional identities, the relationship between social transformations and the processes of ethnic formation, confessional and a number of other identities.Conclusion. An analysis of trends in the development of the modern problem of ethnic / ethnocultural identity shows that many of the constructed concepts have not yet become the result of empirical research, but rather are the fruit of reflections that cannot always be applied to the proper degree.
20 - 21世纪下半叶科技文献中的民族(民族-文化)认同问题(附《文化人类学基础》课程)
目的。本文分析了关于民族/民族文化认同问题的最著名的著作,这些著作不仅包括文化人类学家的著作,还包括心理学家、哲学家、社会学家、文化学家等的著作。由于“同一性”一词与“自我意识”、“自我”、“我的概念”、“我的形象”等概念的关系,目前还没有一个明确的解释,没有一个所有科学家都能共享的单一定义。根据科学立场,已经确定了研究身份、其结构、其组成部分的内容,包括民族文化方面的一些方法。国内外科学家从原始主义、工具主义、建构主义等角度对这一现象进行了不同的解释。特别关注的是民族和地区身份之间的关系,社会转型和民族形成过程之间的关系,忏悔和其他一些身份。对现代民族/民族文化认同问题发展趋势的分析表明,许多建构的概念尚未成为实证研究的结果,而是反思的结果,这些反思并不总是适用于适当的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信