Processes supporting effective skill-mix implementation in general practice: A qualitative study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
S. Spooner, Imelda McDermott, M. Goff, Damian Hodgson, A. Mcbride, K. Checkland
{"title":"Processes supporting effective skill-mix implementation in general practice: A qualitative study","authors":"S. Spooner, Imelda McDermott, M. Goff, Damian Hodgson, A. Mcbride, K. Checkland","doi":"10.1177/13558196221091356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Health policy and funding initiatives have addressed increasing workloads in general practice through the deployment of clinicians from different disciplinary backgrounds. This study examines how general practices in England operate with increasingly diverse groups of practitioners. Methods Five general practices were selected for maximum variation of the duration and diversity of skill-mix in their workforce. Individual interviews were recorded with management and administrative staff and different types of practitioner. Patient surveys and focus groups gathered patients’ perspectives of consulting with different practitioners. Researchers collaborated during coding and thematic analysis of transcripts of audio recordings. Results The introduction of a wide range of practitioners required significant changes in how practices dealt with patients requesting treatment, and these changes were not necessarily straightforward. The matching of patients with practitioners required effective categorization of health care patients’ reported problem(s) and an understanding of practitioners’ capabilities. We identified individual and organizational responses that could minimize the impact on patients, practitioners and practices of imperfections in the matching process. Conclusions The processes underpinning the redistribution of tasks from GPs to non-GP practitioners are complex. As practitioner employment under the Primary Care Network contracts continues to increase, it is not clear how the necessarily fine-grained adjustments will be made for practitioners working across multiple practices.","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"43 1","pages":"269 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196221091356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objectives Health policy and funding initiatives have addressed increasing workloads in general practice through the deployment of clinicians from different disciplinary backgrounds. This study examines how general practices in England operate with increasingly diverse groups of practitioners. Methods Five general practices were selected for maximum variation of the duration and diversity of skill-mix in their workforce. Individual interviews were recorded with management and administrative staff and different types of practitioner. Patient surveys and focus groups gathered patients’ perspectives of consulting with different practitioners. Researchers collaborated during coding and thematic analysis of transcripts of audio recordings. Results The introduction of a wide range of practitioners required significant changes in how practices dealt with patients requesting treatment, and these changes were not necessarily straightforward. The matching of patients with practitioners required effective categorization of health care patients’ reported problem(s) and an understanding of practitioners’ capabilities. We identified individual and organizational responses that could minimize the impact on patients, practitioners and practices of imperfections in the matching process. Conclusions The processes underpinning the redistribution of tasks from GPs to non-GP practitioners are complex. As practitioner employment under the Primary Care Network contracts continues to increase, it is not clear how the necessarily fine-grained adjustments will be made for practitioners working across multiple practices.
在一般实践中支持有效的技能组合实施的过程:一项定性研究
卫生政策和供资举措通过部署来自不同学科背景的临床医生,解决了全科医生工作量不断增加的问题。这项研究考察了英国的全科医生是如何与日益多样化的从业者群体合作的。方法选择了5个通用实践,以最大限度地改变其劳动力技能组合的持续时间和多样性。对管理人员和行政人员以及不同类型的从业人员进行个别访谈。患者调查和焦点小组收集了患者与不同从业人员咨询的观点。研究人员在音频记录的编码和主题分析方面进行了合作。结果广泛引进执业医师需要在处理患者治疗请求方面做出重大改变,而这些改变并不一定是直截了当的。患者与从业人员的匹配需要对医疗保健患者报告的问题进行有效分类,并了解从业人员的能力。我们确定了个人和组织的反应,可以最大限度地减少对患者的影响,从业者和实践不完善的匹配过程。从全科医生到非全科医生的任务再分配的过程是复杂的。随着初级保健网络合同下的从业人员就业不断增加,目前尚不清楚如何为跨多个实践的从业人员进行必要的细粒度调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信