Providing Evidence and “Voice” During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Online Rapid Response Surveys: Lessons from the UJ/HSRC COVID-19 Democracy Survey

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Carin Runciman, S. Rule, M. Bekker, B. Roberts, M. Orkin, Y. D. Davids, N. Bohler-Muller, Kate Alexander
{"title":"Providing Evidence and “Voice” During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Online Rapid Response Surveys: Lessons from the UJ/HSRC COVID-19 Democracy Survey","authors":"Carin Runciman, S. Rule, M. Bekker, B. Roberts, M. Orkin, Y. D. Davids, N. Bohler-Muller, Kate Alexander","doi":"10.1080/21528586.2022.2032315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT COVID-19 presents significant challenges to society and to social scientists in their attempts to understand the unfolding consequences of the pandemic. This article examines how the UJ/HSRC COVID-19 Democracy survey responded to these challenges by conducting a series of rapid-response non-probabilistic surveys using a mass membership online data-free platform, known as the Moya messenger app. While not without its limitations, we argue that the narrowing “digital divide” in South Africa means that online survey research is of increasing utility to researchers under the conditions of the pandemic and beyond. By offering insight into the technicalities of designing, translating and fielding the survey we aim to share insights into best practice that can further develop online survey research in South Africa. In particular, we reflect upon why the river sampling offered by the Moya messenger app was favoured over online panel data. This leads into a discussion of the process of weighting the data to replicate the national population, and the potential biases among participants versus non-participants in the surveys. The article then moves on to illustrate how the findings were used to provide evidence to policymakers and “voice” to adults living in South Africa about their experiences of the pandemic and their views on policy responses. The article considers how the research contributed to the public discourse around the pandemic response in 2020, including the public’s views on various pandemic policy decisions, school closures and pandemic fatigue.","PeriodicalId":44730,"journal":{"name":"South African Review of Sociology","volume":"40 1","pages":"188 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2022.2032315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT COVID-19 presents significant challenges to society and to social scientists in their attempts to understand the unfolding consequences of the pandemic. This article examines how the UJ/HSRC COVID-19 Democracy survey responded to these challenges by conducting a series of rapid-response non-probabilistic surveys using a mass membership online data-free platform, known as the Moya messenger app. While not without its limitations, we argue that the narrowing “digital divide” in South Africa means that online survey research is of increasing utility to researchers under the conditions of the pandemic and beyond. By offering insight into the technicalities of designing, translating and fielding the survey we aim to share insights into best practice that can further develop online survey research in South Africa. In particular, we reflect upon why the river sampling offered by the Moya messenger app was favoured over online panel data. This leads into a discussion of the process of weighting the data to replicate the national population, and the potential biases among participants versus non-participants in the surveys. The article then moves on to illustrate how the findings were used to provide evidence to policymakers and “voice” to adults living in South Africa about their experiences of the pandemic and their views on policy responses. The article considers how the research contributed to the public discourse around the pandemic response in 2020, including the public’s views on various pandemic policy decisions, school closures and pandemic fatigue.
在COVID-19大流行期间使用在线快速反应调查提供证据和“声音”:来自UJ/HSRC COVID-19民主调查的经验教训
2019冠状病毒病对社会和社会科学家提出了重大挑战,他们试图了解疫情的发展后果。本文考察了UJ/HSRC COVID-19民主调查如何通过使用大规模会员在线无数据平台(称为Moya messenger应用程序)进行一系列快速反应的非概率调查来应对这些挑战。尽管并非没有局限性,但我们认为,南非“数字鸿沟”的缩小意味着在线调查研究对研究人员在大流行及其他情况下越来越有用。通过提供对设计、翻译和实地调查的技术见解,我们的目标是分享对最佳实践的见解,以进一步发展南非的在线调查研究。我们特别思考了为什么Moya messenger应用程序提供的河流采样比在线面板数据更受青睐。这导致了对数据加权以复制全国人口的过程的讨论,以及调查中参与者与非参与者之间的潜在偏见。这篇文章接着说明了这些发现是如何被用来向决策者提供证据,并向生活在南非的成年人提供关于他们对大流行的经历和他们对政策应对的看法的“声音”。本文考虑了这项研究如何促进了2020年有关大流行应对的公众话语,包括公众对各种大流行政策决定、学校关闭和大流行疲劳的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信