{"title":"Evolution of a Journal. Editorial Policy 2.0","authors":"William Bains","doi":"10.1016/j.bihy.2009.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Papers submitted to <em>Bioscience Hypotheses</em> should be innovative, clear, compatible with at least most of the facts, and testable. Not all good, new, challenging ideas manage these exacting standards. Editorial policy has been altered to include both an increased role for peer advice and an occasional role for editorial advice to authors to bring out the ideas in a form that I think most likely to attract interest from our readership.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87894,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience hypotheses","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 57-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bihy.2009.02.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756239209000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Papers submitted to Bioscience Hypotheses should be innovative, clear, compatible with at least most of the facts, and testable. Not all good, new, challenging ideas manage these exacting standards. Editorial policy has been altered to include both an increased role for peer advice and an occasional role for editorial advice to authors to bring out the ideas in a form that I think most likely to attract interest from our readership.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
